Amani Alhazmi1, Elizabeth Stojanovski2, Mark McEvoy3, Manohar L Garg4. 1. 1Nutrition and Dietetics,School of Health Sciences,Faculty of Health,University of Newcastle,Callaghan,New South Wales,Australia. 2. 3Schools of Mathematical and Physical Sciences,Faculty of Science and Information Technology,University of Newcastle,Callaghan,New South Wales,Australia. 3. 4Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics,Faculty of Health,University of Newcastle,Callaghan,New South Wales,Australia. 4. 5School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy,305C Medical Sciences Building,Faculty of Health,University of Newcastle,Callaghan,NSW 2308,Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between macronutrient intake and type 2 diabetes risk in middle-aged Australian women. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study, with 6 years (2002-2007) of follow up. Dietary intake was assessed with a validated FFQ. Relative risks with 95 % confidence intervals were used to examine risk associations. SETTING: Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, Australia. SUBJECTS: Australian women (n 8370) from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health aged 45-50 years and free of type 2 diabetes at baseline. RESULTS: After 6 years of follow-up, 311 women developed type 2 diabetes. After adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle and other dietary risk factors, MUFA, total n-3 PUFA, α-linolenic acid and total n-6 PUFA intakes were positively associated with the incidence of type 2 diabetes. The relative risks for type 2 diabetes for the highest compared with the lowest quintiles were 1·64 (95 % CI 1·06, 2·54), P = 0·04 for MUFA; 1·55 (95 % CI 1·03, 2·32), P = 0·01 for n-3 PUFA; 1·84 (95 % CI 1·25, 2·71), P < 0·01 for α-linolenic acid; and 1·60 (95 % CI 1·03, 2·48), P = 0·04 for n-6 PUFA. Other dietary macronutrients were not significantly associated with diabetes risk. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that consumption of MUFA, n-3 PUFA and n-6 PUFA may influence the risk of developing type 2 diabetes in women.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between macronutrient intake and type 2 diabetes risk in middle-aged Australian women. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study, with 6 years (2002-2007) of follow up. Dietary intake was assessed with a validated FFQ. Relative risks with 95 % confidence intervals were used to examine risk associations. SETTING: Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, Australia. SUBJECTS: Australian women (n 8370) from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health aged 45-50 years and free of type 2 diabetes at baseline. RESULTS: After 6 years of follow-up, 311 women developed type 2 diabetes. After adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle and other dietary risk factors, MUFA, total n-3 PUFA, α-linolenic acid and total n-6 PUFA intakes were positively associated with the incidence of type 2 diabetes. The relative risks for type 2 diabetes for the highest compared with the lowest quintiles were 1·64 (95 % CI 1·06, 2·54), P = 0·04 for MUFA; 1·55 (95 % CI 1·03, 2·32), P = 0·01 for n-3 PUFA; 1·84 (95 % CI 1·25, 2·71), P < 0·01 for α-linolenic acid; and 1·60 (95 % CI 1·03, 2·48), P = 0·04 for n-6 PUFA. Other dietary macronutrients were not significantly associated with diabetes risk. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that consumption of MUFA, n-3 PUFA and n-6 PUFA may influence the risk of developing type 2 diabetes in women.
Authors: Geng Zong; Gang Liu; Walter C Willett; Anne J Wanders; Marjan Alssema; Peter L Zock; Frank B Hu; Qi Sun Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Nita G Forouhi; Fumiaki Imamura; Stephen J Sharp; Albert Koulman; Matthias B Schulze; Jusheng Zheng; Zheng Ye; Ivonne Sluijs; Marcela Guevara; José María Huerta; Janine Kröger; Laura Yun Wang; Keith Summerhill; Julian L Griffin; Edith J M Feskens; Aurélie Affret; Pilar Amiano; Heiner Boeing; Courtney Dow; Guy Fagherazzi; Paul W Franks; Carlos Gonzalez; Rudolf Kaaks; Timothy J Key; Kay Tee Khaw; Tilman Kühn; Lotte Maxild Mortensen; Peter M Nilsson; Kim Overvad; Valeria Pala; Domenico Palli; Salvatore Panico; J Ramón Quirós; Miguel Rodriguez-Barranco; Olov Rolandsson; Carlotta Sacerdote; Augustin Scalbert; Nadia Slimani; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Anne Tjonneland; Maria-Jose Tormo; Rosario Tumino; Daphne L van der A; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Claudia Langenberg; Elio Riboli; Nicholas J Wareham Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Alicia Julibert; Maria Del Mar Bibiloni; Cristina Bouzas; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Dolores Corella; Maria Dolors Zomeño; Dora Romaguera; Jesús Vioque; Ángel M Alonso-Gómez; Julia Wärnberg; J Alfredo Martínez; Luís Serra-Majem; Ramon Estruch; Francisco J Tinahones; José Lapetra; Xavier Pintó; José Lopez-Miranda; Laura García-Molina; José Juan Gaforio; Pilar Matía-Martín; Lidia Daimiel; Vicente Martín-Sánchez; Josep Vidal; Clotilde Vázquez; Emili Ros; Estefanía Toledo; Nerea Becerra-Tomás; Olga Pórtoles; Karla A Pérez-Vega; Miquel Fiol; Laura Torres-Collado; Lucas Tojal-Sierra; Rosa Carabaño-Moral; Itziar Abete; Almudena Sanchez-Villegas; Rosa Casas; María Rosa Bernal-López; José Manuel Santos-Lozano; Ana Galera; Lucía Ugarriza; Miguel Ruiz-Canela; Nancy Babio; Oscar Coltell; Helmut Schröder; Jadwiga Konieczna; Domingo Orozco-Beltrán; Carolina Sorto-Sánchez; Sonia Eguaras; Laura Barrubés; Montserrat Fitó; Josep A Tur Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-06-29 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Russell J de Souza; Andrew Mente; Adriana Maroleanu; Adrian I Cozma; Vanessa Ha; Teruko Kishibe; Elizabeth Uleryk; Patrick Budylowski; Holger Schünemann; Joseph Beyene; Sonia S Anand Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-08-11