Literature DB >> 23865515

Comparison of outcomes of twins conceived spontaneously and by artificial reproductive therapy.

Akila Anbazhagan1, Alyson Hunter, Fionnuala M Breathnach, Fionnuala M Mcauliffe, Michael P Geary, Sean Daly, John R Higgins, John J Morrison, Gerard Burke, Shane Higgins, Patrick Dicker, Elizabeth Tully, Stephen Carroll, Fergal D Malone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of twin pregnancies conceived by artificial reproductive techniques (ART) with those of spontaneous conception. STUDY
DESIGN: In this multicenter prospective trial, comparisons were made between methods of conception in twin pregnancies, for maternal and perinatal outcomes.
RESULTS: Of 1001 twin pairs, 763/1001 (72.7%) were spontaneously conceived and 238/1001(27.3%) were conceived by ART. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to obstetric complications. There were 13 per 1000 (20/1504; 1%) perinatal deaths in the spontaneously conceived group and 6 per 1000 (3/466; 0.6%) in the ART group (p = 0.8141). We found no differences in gestational age at delivery (median 36.9 versus 37.0 weeks), birth weight (median 2520 g versus 2538 g), or in a composite measure of adverse perinatal outcome (17% versus 15%) between the groups.
CONCLUSION: There were no differences in the rate of adverse obstetric or perinatal outcomes between twins conceived naturally compared with twins conceived by assisted conception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23865515     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.818653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  4 in total

1.  Impact of Conception Method on Twin Pregnancy Course and Outcome.

Authors:  S Andrijasevic; J Dotlic; S Aksam; J Micic; M Terzic
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Obstetrics and perinatal outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancy following ART compared with spontaneous pregnancy.

Authors:  Leila Pourali; Sedigheh Ayati; Shahrzad Jelodar; Ahmadreza Zarifian; Mohammad Sobhan Sheikh Andalibi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)       Date:  2016-05

Review 4.  Risks of spontaneously and IVF-conceived singleton and twin pregnancies differ, requiring reassessment of statistical premises favoring elective single embryo transfer (eSET).

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Vitally A Kushnir; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.211

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.