BACKGROUND: Multiple diet indexes have been developed to capture the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern and examine relations with health outcomes but have not been compared within the same study population to our knowledge. OBJECTIVE: We compared 4 established DASH indexes and examined associations with colorectal cancer. DESIGN: Scores were generated from a food-frequency questionnaire in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study (n = 491,841). Separate indexes defined by Dixon (7 food groups, saturated fat, and alcohol), Mellen (9 nutrients), Fung (7 food groups and sodium), and Günther (8 food groups) were used. HRs and 95% CIs for colorectal cancer were generated by using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: From 1995 through 2006, 6752 incident colorectal cancer cases were ascertained. In men, higher scores were associated with reduced colorectal cancer incidence by comparing highest to lowest quintiles for all indexes as follows: Dixon (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.87), Mellen (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.86), Fung (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.83), and Günther (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.90). Higher scores in women were inversely associated with colorectal cancer incidence by using methods defined by Mellen (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.91), Fung (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.96), and Günther (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73.0.97) but not Dixon (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.28). CONCLUSION: The consistency in findings, particularly in men, suggests that all indexes capture an underlying construct inherent in the DASH dietary pattern, although the specific index used can affect results.
BACKGROUND: Multiple diet indexes have been developed to capture the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern and examine relations with health outcomes but have not been compared within the same study population to our knowledge. OBJECTIVE: We compared 4 established DASH indexes and examined associations with colorectal cancer. DESIGN: Scores were generated from a food-frequency questionnaire in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study (n = 491,841). Separate indexes defined by Dixon (7 food groups, saturated fat, and alcohol), Mellen (9 nutrients), Fung (7 food groups and sodium), and Günther (8 food groups) were used. HRs and 95% CIs for colorectal cancer were generated by using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: From 1995 through 2006, 6752 incident colorectal cancer cases were ascertained. In men, higher scores were associated with reduced colorectal cancer incidence by comparing highest to lowest quintiles for all indexes as follows: Dixon (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.87), Mellen (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.86), Fung (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.83), and Günther (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.90). Higher scores in women were inversely associated with colorectal cancer incidence by using methods defined by Mellen (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.91), Fung (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.96), and Günther (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73.0.97) but not Dixon (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.28). CONCLUSION: The consistency in findings, particularly in men, suggests that all indexes capture an underlying construct inherent in the DASH dietary pattern, although the specific index used can affect results.
Authors: A Schatzkin; A F Subar; F E Thompson; L C Harlan; J Tangrea; A R Hollenbeck; P E Hurwitz; L Coyle; N Schussler; D S Michaud; L S Freedman; C C Brown; D Midthune; V Kipnis Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2001-12-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: F M Sacks; L P Svetkey; W M Vollmer; L J Appel; G A Bray; D Harsha; E Obarzanek; P R Conlin; E R Miller; D G Simons-Morton; N Karanja; P H Lin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-01-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lawrence H Kushi; Tim Byers; Colleen Doyle; Elisa V Bandera; Marji McCullough; Anne McTiernan; Ted Gansler; Kimberly S Andrews; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Teresa T Fung; Stephanie E Chiuve; Marjorie L McCullough; Kathryn M Rexrode; Giancarlo Logroscino; Frank B Hu Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-04-14
Authors: Frances E Thompson; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Laurence S Freedman; Raymond J Carroll; Amy F Subar; Charles C Brown; Matthew S Butcher; Traci Mouw; Michael Leitzmann; Arthur Schatzkin Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2007-07-05 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Fred K Tabung; Susan E Steck; Jiajia Zhang; Yunsheng Ma; Angela D Liese; Ilir Agalliu; Melanie Hingle; Lifang Hou; Thomas G Hurley; Li Jiao; Lisa W Martin; Amy E Millen; Hannah L Park; Milagros C Rosal; James M Shikany; Nitin Shivappa; Judith K Ockene; James R Hebert Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Fred K Tabung; Susan E Steck; Yunsheng Ma; Angela D Liese; Jiajia Zhang; Dorothy S Lane; Gloria Y F Ho; Lifang Hou; Linda Snetselaar; Judith K Ockene; James R Hebert Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Yang Liu; Marie Fanelli Kuczmarski; Edgar R Miller; M Berenice Nava; Alan B Zonderman; Michele K Evans; Neil R Powe; Deidra C Crews Journal: J Ren Nutr Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 3.655
Authors: Joshua Petimar; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Teresa T Fung; Bernard Rosner; Andrew T Chan; Frank B Hu; Edward L Giovannucci; Fred K Tabung Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Ashley J Vargas; Marian L Neuhouser; Stephanie M George; Cynthia A Thomson; Gloria Y F Ho; Thomas E Rohan; Ikuko Kato; Rami Nassir; Lifang Hou; JoAnn E Manson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-06-05 Impact factor: 4.897