Literature DB >> 23864046

Reacting while moving: influence of right limb movement on left limb reaction.

Deanna M Kennedy1, Chaoyi Wang, Charles H Shea.   

Abstract

An experiment was designed to determine whether the activation of a muscle group (flexors or extensors) used to produce an ongoing movement of one limb influenced the reaction time and associated initiation of elbow flexion or extension movements of the contralateral limb. Right-handed participants in the bimanual groups were asked to produce a pattern of flexion/extension movements defined by a sine wave (period = 2 s, amplitude = 16°) with the right limb. While performing the right limb movement, participants were instructed that they were to react as quickly as possible by making a flexion or extension movement with their left limb when the cursor they were using to track the sine wave changed color. Participants in the unimanual groups performed the left limb reaction time task but were not asked to make right limb movements. The reaction time stimulus occurred once in each trial and was presented at one of six locations on one of the six cycles comprising the sinusoidal waveform. Participants performed 7 blocks of 6 test trials. Reaction time was calculated as the time interval between the color change of the cursor and the initiation of the response with the left limb. Movement time was calculated as the interval of time between the initiation of the response and the left limb cursor crossing the upper or lower boundary line. Mean reaction of the left limb was significantly influenced by the concurrent type of movement (flexion/extension) of the right limb. Reaction times were shorter on trials in which both limbs were initiating movement with homologous muscles as compared to trials in which the limbs were initiating movement with non-homologous muscles. No differences were detected when the stimuli were presented during the ballistic phase of the right limb movement, and no differences at any position were detected for the unimanual groups. This result is consistent with the notion that neural crosstalk can influence the time required to react to a stimulus but this influence occurs when contralateral muscles are activated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23864046     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3638-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination.

Authors:  F Mechsner; D Kerzel; G Knoblich; W Prinz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Joern Diedrichsen; Steven W Kennerley; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2002-11-26

3.  Spatial constraints in bimanual coordination: influences of effector orientation.

Authors:  Timothy D Lee; Quincy J Almeida; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Parametric coupling and generalized decoupling revealed by concurrent and successive isometric contractions of distal muscles.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Will Spijkers; Christoph Steglich; Thomas Kleinsorge
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2002-09

Review 5.  The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models.

Authors:  Simone Cardoso de Oliveira
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2002-06

6.  Perceptual and attentional influences on continuous 2:1 and 3:2 multi-frequency bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; John J Buchanan; Charles H Shea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Egocentric and allocentric constraints in the expression of patterns of interlimb coordination.

Authors:  S P Swinnen; K Jardin; R Meulenbroek; N Dounskaia; M H Den Brandt
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Muscle activation patterns during two types of voluntary single-joint movement.

Authors:  G L Gottlieb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The dynamics of bimanual circle drawing.

Authors:  R G Carson; J Thomas; J J Summers; M R Walters; A Semjen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1997-08

10.  Reaction time, speed of performance, and age.

Authors:  A T Welford
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Bimanual force control: cooperation and interference?

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Jason B Boyle; Chaoyi Wang; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-07

3.  Rhythmical bimanual force production: homologous and non-homologous muscles.

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Jason B Boyle; Joohyun Rhee; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Symmetrical and asymmetrical influences on force production in 1:2 and 2:1 bimanual force coordination tasks.

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Joohyun Rhee; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of inherent and incidental constraints on bimanual and social coordination.

Authors:  Yiyu Wang; Osmar Pinto Neto; Madison M Davis; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Response biases: the influence of the contralateral limb and head position.

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Sara Safdari; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.