| Literature DB >> 23862140 |
Darinka Gjorgieva1, Tatjana Kadifkova Panovska, Tatjana Ruskovska, Katerina Bačeva, Trajče Stafilov.
Abstract
Heavy metals have the potential to interact and induce several stress responses in the plants; thus, effects of heavy metal stress on DNA damages and total antioxidants level in Urtica dioica leaves and stems were investigated. The samples are sampled from areas with different metal exposition. Metal content was analyzed by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometer (ICP-AES), for total antioxidants level assessment the Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay was used, and genomic DNA isolation from frozen plant samples was performed to obtain DNA fingerprints of investigated plant. It was found that heavy metal contents in stems generally changed synchronously with those in leaves of the plant, and extraneous metals led to imbalance of mineral nutrient elements. DNA damages were investigated by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique, and the results demonstrated that the samples exposed to metals yielded a large number of new fragments (total 12) in comparison with the control sample. This study showed that DNA stability is highly affected by metal pollution which was identified by RAPD markers. Results suggested that heavy metal stress influences antioxidant status and also induces DNA damages in U. dioica which may help to understand the mechanisms of metals genotoxicity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23862140 PMCID: PMC3687766 DOI: 10.1155/2013/276417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1City of Veles and Plačkovica Mountain as sampling areas.
Elemental analysis of U. dioica sampled from two different areas (in mg kg−1 dry mass).
| Plant organ investigated | Metals | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | Cd | Cu | Mg | Mn | Na | Ni | Pb | Zn | |
| Location (unpolluted area) Plačkovica Mountain | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| 23281 ± 4 | <LD* | 6.73 ± 0.06 | 4295 ± 1.3 | 29.66 ± 0.08 | 52.33 ± 0.3 | <LD | 3.73 ± 0.1 | 14.24 ± 0.1 |
|
| 37725 ± 5 | 7.34 ± 0.04 | 11.3 ± 0.03 | 6412.4 ± 2.5 | 74.71 ± 0.14 | 138.1 ± 2.7 | 2.89 ± 0.04 | 102.2 ± 0.4 | 465.3 ± 0.6 |
|
| |||||||||
| Location (polluted area) Veles | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| 9245 ± 5 | <LD* | 7.16 ± 0.06 | 3366 ± 1.4 | 15.16 ± 0.08 | 46.43 ± 0.5 | <LD | <LD | 22.27 ± 0.3 |
|
| 17816 ± 16 | 6.67 ± 0.03 | 8.25 ± 0.03 | 5036 ± 1.2 | 24.63 ± 0.05 | 86.95 ± 0.8 | <LD | 24.79 ± 0.2 | 229.5 ± 1.3 |
*LD is limit of detection (0.01 mg kg−1).
Total antioxidants level in U. dioica sampled from two different areas obtained with FRAP assay (in μmol FeSO4 L−1).
| Plant organ investigated | FRAP values |
|---|---|
| Location (unpolluted area) Plačkovica Mountain | |
|
| |
|
| 4845.5 ± 7.3 |
|
| 1849.6 ± 2.5 |
|
| |
| Location (polluted area) Veles | |
|
| |
|
| 961 ± 1.9 |
|
| 640 ± 1.1 |
Figure 2RAPD profiles of U. dioica sampled from two different areas obtained with different primers ((1) primer 1, (2) primer 2, and (3) primer 3): (1) U. dioica Plačkovica and (2) U. dioica Veles; M is DNA marker.
Figure 3RAPD profiles of U. dioica sampled from two different areas obtained with different primers ((1) primer 4, (2) primer 5, (3) primer 6, and (4) primer 7): (1) U. dioica Plačkovica and (2) U. dioica Veles; M is DNA marker.
Changes in the RAPD profiles (the number of bands and molecular sizes—bp) related to metals exposition compared to control; “+” appearance of DNA bands and/or “−” disappearance of DNA bands for all primers in the U. dioica plants.
| Plant | Primers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primer 1 | Primer 2 | Primer 3 | Primer 4 | Primer 5 | Primer 6 | Primer 7 | |
|
| 0 | 2500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| (+) 3000 | (+) 0 | (+) 2500; 2000; 1250 | (+) 5000; 2500 | (+) 5000; 4000; 3000 | (+) 2000 | (+) 3000; 2500 |
| (−) 0 | (−) 2500 | (−) 0 | (−) 0 | (−) 0 | (−) 0 | (−) 0 | |