| Literature DB >> 23862075 |
Wei Li1, Tong Han, Wen Qin, Jing Zhang, Huaigui Liu, Ying Li, Liangliang Meng, Xunming Ji, Chunshui Yu.
Abstract
The cerebellum contains several cognitive-related subregions that are involved in different functional networks. The cerebellar crus II is correlated with the frontoparietal network (FPN), whereas the cerebellar IX is associated with the default-mode network (DMN). These two networks are anticorrelated and cooperatively implicated in cognitive control, which may facilitate the motor recovery in stroke patients. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) changes in 25 subcortical ischemic stroke patients with well-recovered global motor function. Consistent with previous studies, the crus II was correlated with the FPN, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and posterior parietal cortex, and the cerebellar IX was correlated with the DMN, including the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus (PCC/Pcu), medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), DLPFC, lateral parietal cortices, and anterior temporal cortices. No significantly increased rsFCs of these cerebellar subregions were found in stroke patients, suggesting that the rsFCs of the cognitive-related cerebellar subregions are not the critical factors contributing to the recovery of motor function in stroke patients. The finding of the disconnection in the cerebellar-related cognitive control networks may possibly explain the deficits in cognitive control function even in stroke patients with well-recovered global motor function.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23862075 PMCID: PMC3703724 DOI: 10.1155/2013/452439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Figure 1(a) Lesion locations of stroke patients on axial T2-weighted images acquired at the stroke onset when stroke patients were first enrolled in our hospital. (b) The morphology and signals of the brainstem of every stroke patient.
Clinical information of stroke patients.
| ID | Sex | Age (year) | Duration (month) | Lesion location | MMSE | FMT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UE | WE | ||||||
| BG001 | F | 65 | 63 | Right PLIC, CR | 29 | 62 | 94 |
| BG002 | M | 62 | 41 | Right PLIC, GIC | 27 | 66 | 100 |
| BG003 | F | 63 | 48 | Right CR, PLIC, LN | 30 | 65 | 98 |
| BG004 | F | 52 | 64 | Right CR, PLIC, LN | 30 | 65 | 99 |
| BG005 | M | 53 | 37 | Right CR, PLIC, LN | / | 62 | 95 |
| BG006 | M | 65 | 37 | Right CR | 28 | 66 | 98 |
| BG007 | M | 59 | 41 | Left CR, PLIC, LN | 29 | 64 | 98 |
| BG008 | M | 49 | 40 | Left CR, PLIC, LN | 28 | 65 | 98 |
| BG009 | M | 60 | 30 | Left CR | 26 | 66 | 100 |
| BG010 | F | 72 | 41 | Right CR, PLIC, LN | 26 | 65 | 98 |
| BG011 | F | 55 | 24 | Left Th | 26 | 66 | 100 |
| BG012 | M | 49 | 24 | Right CR, LN | 30 | 66 | 100 |
| BG013 | M | 42 | 24 | Left Th | 28 | 66 | 100 |
| BG014 | M | 50 | 18 | Left CR, PLIC | 27 | 66 | 100 |
| BG015 | M | 52 | 22 | Left CR, PLIC | 29 | 66 | 100 |
| BG016 | M | 58 | 52 | Left PLIC | 29 | 66 | 100 |
| BG017 | M | 65 | 20 | Right CR, PLIC, LN | 28 | 65 | 99 |
| BG018 | F | 63 | 14 | Right Th | 28 | 66 | 100 |
| BG019 | M | 55 | 11 | Left PLIC, LN | 30 | 66 | 100 |
| BG020 | M | 47 | 13 | Left CR | / | 66 | 100 |
| BG021 | M | 58 | 14 | Right CR, Cau, ALIC | / | 66 | 100 |
| BG022 | M | 63 | 13 | Left CR, PLIC | 27 | 66 | 100 |
| BG023 | M | 45 | 11 | Right CR | 30 | 66 | 100 |
| BG024 | M | 49 | 13 | Right CR, PLIC | 30 | 64 | 96 |
| BG025 | F | 53 | 11 | Left CR, PLIC, LN | 28 | 66 | 99 |
ALIC: anterior limb of internal capsule; Cau: caudate; CR: corona radiate; GIC: genu of internal capsule; LN: lenticular nucleus; PLIC: posterior limb of internal capsule; Th: thalamus.
Figure 2The bilateral seed regions of the cerebellar subregions of crura II and IX extracted from the probabilistic cerebellar atlas with a threshold of 50% minimum probability.
Figure 3The rsFC patterns of the cerebellar subregions in healthy controls and stroke patients (total: n = 25) and the rsFC differences between stroke patients and healthy controls (P < 0.05 corrected). (a) The rsFC patterns of the cerebellar subregions in healthy controls; (b) the rsFC patterns of the cerebellar subregions in stroke patients; (c) the differences in the rsFCs between stroke patients and healthy controls.
The rsFCs of the cerebellar crura II and IX in both of the control and patient groups and significant group differences in these rsFCs between healthy controls and stroke patients.
| Seed regions | Connected regions | Group difference | Peak | Peak coordinate MNI ( | Cluster size (voxels) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CL_crus II | IL_DLPFC | ∗ | 4.23 | 30, 18, 39 | 74 |
| IL_LPC | |||||
| IL_Pcu | |||||
| IL_ITG | |||||
| IL_MTG | |||||
| CL_ITG | |||||
| CL_DLPFC | |||||
|
| |||||
| IL_crus II | B_DLPFC | ||||
| B_MPFC | |||||
| IL_ITG | |||||
| CL_LPC | |||||
| CL_MTG/ITG | |||||
| CL_PCC/Pcu | |||||
| CL_Cal | |||||
| CL_Cau | ∗ | 4.11 | −12, 6, 15 | 40 | |
| CL_Th | |||||
|
| |||||
| CL_IX | B_PCC/Pcu | ||||
| B_MCC | |||||
| IL_MPFC | ∗ | 3.42 | 6, 48, 33 | 80 | |
| IL_ACC | |||||
| IL_MTG/MOG | |||||
| IL_LPC | ∗ | 3.18 | 54, − 57, 18 | 44 | |
| IL_DLPFC | ∗ | 3.98 | 33, 24, 42 | 38 | |
| CL_DLPFC | |||||
| CL_LPC | |||||
| CL_MPFC | |||||
|
| |||||
| IL_IX | IL_MPFC | ∗ | 4.35 | 18, 57, 21 | 241 |
| IL_LPC | ∗ | 4.14 | 54, − 54, 21 | 103 | |
| IL_DLPFC | ∗ | 3.97 | 36, 24, 45 | 77 | |
| IL_MTG | |||||
| IL_PCC/Pcu | ∗ | 3.30 | 15, − 54, 33 | 51 | |
| CL_ParaHP | |||||
| CL_LPC | ∗ | 3.95 | −51, − 57, 24 | 66 | |
| CL_PCC/Pcu | |||||
ACC: anterior cingulated cortex; Cal: calcarine; Cau: caudate; CL: contralesional hemisphere; DLPFC: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; IL: ipsilesional hemisphere; ITG: inferior temporal gyrus; LPC: lateral parietal cortex; MCC: middle cingulate cortex; MOG: middle occipital gyrus; MPFC: the medial part of prefrontal cortex; MTG: middle temporal gyrus; ParaHP: parahippocampal; PCC: posterior cingulate cortex; Pcu: precuneus; Th: thalamus. The star (∗) represents that the rsFC shows significant group difference between stroke patients and healthy controls.
Figure 4The rsFC patterns of the cerebellar subregions in healthy controls and stroke patients (subgroup: n = 11) and the rsFC differences between stroke patients and healthy controls (P < 0.05 corrected). (a) The rsFC patterns of the cerebellar subregions in healthy controls; (b) the rsFC patterns of the cerebellar subregions in stroke patients; (c) the differences in the rsFCs between stroke patients and healthy controls.