BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies on adult stroke patients have demonstrated functional changes in cortical excitability, metabolic rate, or blood flow after motor therapy, measures that can fluctuate rapidly over time. This study evaluated whether evidence could also be found for structural brain changes during an efficacious rehabilitation program. METHODS:Chronic stroke patients were randomly assigned to receive either constraint-induced movement therapy (n=16) or a comparison therapy (n=20). Longitudinal voxel-based morphometry was performed on structural MRI scans obtained immediately before and after patients received therapy. RESULTS: The group receiving constraint-induced movement therapy exhibited far greater improvement in use of the more affected arm in the life situation than the comparison therapy group. Structural brain changes paralleled these improvements in spontaneous use of the more impaired arm for activities of daily living. There were profuse increases in gray matter in sensory and motor areas both contralateral and ipsilateral to the affected arm that were bilaterally symmetrical, as well as bilaterally in the hippocampus. In contrast, the comparison therapy group failed to show gray matter increases. Importantly, the magnitude of the observed gray matter increases was significantly correlated with amount of improvement in real-world arm use. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a previously overlooked type of brain plasticity, structural remodeling of the human brain, is harnessed by constraint-induced movement therapy for a condition once thought to be refractory to treatment: motor deficit in chronic stroke patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies on adult strokepatients have demonstrated functional changes in cortical excitability, metabolic rate, or blood flow after motor therapy, measures that can fluctuate rapidly over time. This study evaluated whether evidence could also be found for structural brain changes during an efficacious rehabilitation program. METHODS:Chronic strokepatients were randomly assigned to receive either constraint-induced movement therapy (n=16) or a comparison therapy (n=20). Longitudinal voxel-based morphometry was performed on structural MRI scans obtained immediately before and after patients received therapy. RESULTS: The group receiving constraint-induced movement therapy exhibited far greater improvement in use of the more affected arm in the life situation than the comparison therapy group. Structural brain changes paralleled these improvements in spontaneous use of the more impaired arm for activities of daily living. There were profuse increases in gray matter in sensory and motor areas both contralateral and ipsilateral to the affected arm that were bilaterally symmetrical, as well as bilaterally in the hippocampus. In contrast, the comparison therapy group failed to show gray matter increases. Importantly, the magnitude of the observed gray matter increases was significantly correlated with amount of improvement in real-world arm use. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a previously overlooked type of brain plasticity, structural remodeling of the human brain, is harnessed by constraint-induced movement therapy for a condition once thought to be refractory to treatment: motor deficit in chronic strokepatients.
Authors: George F Wittenberg; Robert Chen; Kenji Ishii; Khalafalla O Bushara; Susan Eckloff; Earllaine Croarkin; Edward Taub; Lynn H Gerber; Mark Hallett; Leonardo G Cohen Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Tetsumori Yamashima; Anton B Tonchev; Ivan H Vachkov; Boryana K Popivanova; Tatsunori Seki; Kazunobu Sawamoto; Hideyuki Okano Journal: Hippocampus Date: 2004 Impact factor: 3.899
Authors: Shihui Xing; Elizabeth H Lacey; Laura M Skipper-Kallal; Xiong Jiang; Michelle L Harris-Love; Jinsheng Zeng; Peter E Turkeltaub Journal: Brain Date: 2015-10-31 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Samuel T Nemanich; Chao-Ying Chen; Mo Chen; Elizabeth Zorn; Bryon Mueller; Colleen Peyton; Jed T Elison; James Stinear; Raghu Rao; Michael Georgieff; Jeremiah Menk; Kyle Rudser; Bernadette Gillick Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2019-06-01
Authors: Alicia J Spittle; Jeanie Cheong; Lex W Doyle; Gehan Roberts; Katherine J Lee; Jeremy Lim; Rod W Hunt; Terrie E Inder; Peter J Anderson Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Xin Wang; Mischka Gerken; Michael Dennis; Richard Mooney; John Kane; Sadik Khuder; Hong Xie; William Bauer; A Vania Apkarian; John Wall Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Rebecca Lewthwaite; Carolee J Winstein; Christianne J Lane; Sarah Blanton; Burl R Wagenheim; Monica A Nelsen; Alexander W Dromerick; Steven L Wolf Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: DeAnna L Adkins; Lindsay Ferguson; Steven Lance; Aleksandr Pevtsov; Kevin McDonough; Justin Stamschror; Theresa A Jones; Dorothy A Kozlowski Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; Victor W Mark; David M Morris; Joydip Barman; Mary H Bowman; Camille Bryson; Adriana Delgado; Staci Bishop-McKay Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 7.914