| Literature DB >> 23861765 |
Young Ho Park1, Jae-Won Jang, Youngsoon Yang, Jung Eun Kim, SangYun Kim.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Two parallel pathways have been proposed between the hippocampus and neocortex. Recently, the anterior and posterior hippocampus showed distinct connectivity with different cortical areas in an fMRI study. We investigated whether the two parallel pathways could be confirmed in patients with transient global amnesia (TGA) which is a natural lesion model of a perturbation of the hippocampus. In addition, we evaluated the relationship between the location of the hippocampal lesion and various clinical variables.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23861765 PMCID: PMC3702497 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Comparison of the baseline characteristics based on the site of DWI lesion.
| Hippocampal headlesion (n = 15) | Hippocampal bodylesion | Hippocampaltail lesion (n = 7) | P value | |
|
| 59 (52–66) | 62 (56–66) | 60 (57–63) | 0.654 |
|
| 3 (20.0%) | 6 (40.0%) | 2 (28.6%) | 0.649 |
|
| ||||
|
| 6 (40.0%) | 7 (50.0%) | 4 (57.1%) | 0.753 |
|
| 6 (40.0%) | 8 (57.1%) | 3 (42.9%) | 0.683 |
|
| 5 (33.3%) | 0 | 0 | 0.016 |
|
| 5 (3–7) | 6.5 (5.75–10.5) | 7 (6.5–13) | 0.079 |
|
| ||||
|
| 5 (33.3%) | 3 (21.4%) | 4 (57.1%) | 0.277 |
|
| 3 (20.0%) | 1 (7.1%) | 0 | 0.501 |
|
| 5 (33.3%) | 0 | 0 | 0.016 |
|
| 7 (46.7%) | 10 (71.4%) | 3 (42.9%) | 0.375 |
|
| 4 (26.7%) | 6 (42.9%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0.411 |
|
| 1 (6.7%) | 2 (14.3%) | 0 | 0.588 |
|
| 3 (20%) | 6 (42.9%) | 4 (57.1%) | 0.186 |
|
| 0 | 3 (21.4%) | 0 | 0.141 |
|
| 0.159 | |||
|
| 4 (26.7%) | 6 (40.0%) | 1 (14.3%) | |
|
| 6 (40.0%) | 8 (53.3%) | 2 (28.6%) | |
|
| 5 (33.3%) | 1 (6.7%) | 4 (57.1%) | |
|
| 49 (7–72) | 50 (10–72) | 71 (9.5–72) | 0.937 |
|
| 48 (29–96) | 45 (28–68) | 49 (40–70) | 0.902 |
Values are number (%) unless indicated.
Abbreviations: DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging; IQR = interquartile range; TGA = transient global amnesia.
For one patient from group with hippocampal body lesions, only data concerning age, gender, laterality of DWI lesion, time of onset to DWI and time of onset to SPECT were available.
P values were obtained using the Kruskall-Wallis test or the Fisher's exact test as appropriate.
When patients were able to explain the reasons for their hospitalizations and to form new memories, we considered their episode of TGA to be over.
Figure 1Examples of hippocampal head, body and tail lesion on diffusion-weighted imaging.
The punctuate hyperintense lesions in the hippocampal head (A), body (B) and tail (C) were indicated with white arrows on axial diffusion-weighted imaging.
Figure 2Areas of hypoperfusion in relation to the longitudinal location of the hippocampal lesion.
Perfusion deficits in patients with hippocampal lesions on head vs. tail (A), tail vs. head (B), head vs. body (C), body vs. head (D), body vs. tail (E), and tail vs. body (F) were shown. The hypoperfusion areas (red color) were displayed on rendering images at a threshold of P<0.005 uncorrected, k = 100.
Regions of perfusion deficit based on the site of hippocampal lesion along the anterior-posterior axis (P<0.005, uncorrected, k = 100).
| Variables | Regions | BA | Stereotaxic coordinates | T value | Cluster size | ||
| x | y | z | |||||
| Head<Tail | Rt. fusiform gyrus | 20 | −42 | −18 | −30 | 4.52 | 435 |
| Rt. middle temporal gyrus | 21 | −54 | 2 | −24 | 3.26 | 320 | |
| Rt. inferior frontal gyrus | 45 | −58 | 34 | 14 | 3.20 | 188 | |
| Rt. middle cingulate gyrus | 23 | −12 | −20 | 40 | 3.05 | 144 | |
| Tail<Head | Rt. Precuneus | 7 | −4 | −66 | 62 | 5.61 | 5,089 |
| Rt. superior occipital gyrus | 7 | −28 | −76 | 44 | 4.75 | ||
| Lt. superior parietal gyrus | 7 | 32 | −64 | 52 | 4.50 | ||
| Lt. cerebellar uvula | n/a | 6 | −54 | −32 | 4.97 | 4,169 | |
| Lt. cerebellar uvula | n/a | 12 | −44 | −36 | 4.87 | ||
| Cerebellar vermis | n/a | −2 | −54 | −30 | 4.47 | ||
| Head<Body | Rt. middle frontal gyrus | 46 | −30 | 28 | 32 | 3.33 | 105 |
| Body<Head | Lt. crus cerebelli | n/a | 46 | −68 | −38 | 3.76 | 318 |
| Lt. crus cerebelli | n/a | 35 | −80 | −34 | 3.31 | ||
| Lt. crus cerebelli | n/a | 25 | −82 | −42 | 2.80 | ||
| Rt. cerebellar uvula | n/a | −10 | −54 | −32 | 3.74 | 816 | |
| Rt. cerebellar pyramis | n/a | −15 | −58 | −48 | 3.54 | ||
| Rt. cerebellar pyramis | n/a | −40 | −55 | −50 | 3.24 | ||
| Body<Tail | Lt. Rolandic operculum | 48 | 68 | 4 | 2 | 4.34 | 186 |
| Lt. postcentral gyrus | 6 | 38 | −14 | 42 | 3.86 | 202 | |
| Lt. inferior temporal gyrus | 58 | 58 | −18 | −36 | 3.76 | 104 | |
| Rt. superior frontal gyrus | 20 | −12 | 48 | −20 | 3.74 | 409 | |
| Rt. rectus gyrus | 11 | −14 | 32 | −20 | 2.98 | ||
| Rt. middle temporal gyrus | 21 | −54 | 0 | −22 | 3.30 | 144 | |
| Rt. temporal pole | 38 | −50 | 10 | −14 | 3.12 | ||
| Tail<Body | Lt. angular gyrus | 7 | 36 | −70 | 44 | 4.78 | 1,386 |
| Lt. middle occipital gyrus | 19 | 28 | −75 | 15 | 4.59 | ||
| Lt. middle occipital gyrus | 19 | 38 | −75 | 30 | 3.21 | ||
| Rt. superior occipital gyrus | 19 | −22 | −78 | 40 | 4.55 | 829 | |
| Lt. middle frontal gyrus | 46 | 46 | 36 | 40 | 3.89 | 177 | |
| Rt. middle temporal gyrus | 20 | −52 | −26 | −10 | 3.53 | 117 | |
| Lt. middle temporal gyrus | 21 | 52 | −42 | −4 | 3.32 | 202 | |
| Lt. paracentral lobule | 6 | 4 | −16 | 80 | 3.22 | 147 | |
Abbreviations: DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging; BA = Brodmann area; n/a = not available.
Figure 3Dendrogram based on the hierarchical cluster analysis.
Four principal clusters were observed: (i) women with symptoms of nausea and dizziness, patients with hippocampal head lesions, and patients who were induced by vomiting; (ii) patients aged <60 years; (iii) men with vascular risk factors and patients with hippocampal body lesions; and (iv) patients aged ≥60 years and patients without associated symptoms.