Literature DB >> 23861557

Cone directionality from laser ray tracing in normal and LASIK patients.

Susana Marcos1, Stephen A Burns.   

Abstract

Laser ray tracing, a technique originally developed to measure ocular aberrations from the deviations of the local ray aberrations as a function of entry pupil, was used to assess cone directionality in 29 normal eyes (seven of which underwent LASIK surgery) and seven eyes after LASIK corneal refractive surgery for myopia. The total intensity of the retinal aerial images was computed as a function of the entry location of the illuminated beam. The measured intensity distribution was fit to a two-dimensional Gaussian function plus a constant background. The maximum of the distribution represents the pupillary location toward which the cone photoreceptors are oriented (peak of the optical Stiles-Crawford, SCE, function). We found the average SCE peak location was located 0.43 ± 0.96mm nasally and 0.60 ± 0.87mm inferiorly to the center of the pupil. In general, there was not a relation between the pupillary area of best quality and SCE peak location, either pre-operatively or post-operatively. The cone directionality shape factor was also unchanged by surgery. However, in two eyes, pre- and post-operative SCE peak location changed significantly. LASIK refractive surgery decreased the MTF in all eyes, even when the actual SCE directionality of the subject is considered. In the two eyes that showed significantly different SCE peak location, the apodized post-operative MTF with the post-operative SCE peak exceeded the simulated post-operative MTF assuming no shift in the SCE peak. However, the statistical power of these two cases is low, and the general findings are consistent with the hypothesis that differences in optical quality are not a major driving mechanism for cone orientation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LASIK surgery; Stiles-Crawford; cone orientation mechanism; laser ray tracing; ocular aberrations; optical quality

Year:  2009        PMID: 23861557      PMCID: PMC3710692          DOI: 10.1080/09500340902927074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mod Opt        ISSN: 0950-0340            Impact factor:   1.464


  36 in total

1.  Comparison of cone directionality determined by psychophysical and reflectometric techniques.

Authors:  J C He; S Marcos; S A Burns
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing.

Authors:  E Moreno-Barriuso; J M Lloves; S Marcos; R Navarro; L Llorente; S Barbero
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Wavelength dependence of reflectometric cone photoreceptor directionality.

Authors:  Niels P A Zagers; Tos T J M Berendschot; Dirk van Norren
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Effect of wavelength on in vivo images of the human cone mosaic.

Authors:  Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Julianna Lin; Julian Christou; David R Williams
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Variations in photoreceptor directionally across the central retina.

Authors:  S A Burns; S Wu; J C He; A E Elsner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Birefringence of the human foveal area assessed in vivo with Mueller-matrix ellipsometry.

Authors:  H B Brink; G J van Blokland
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Aging and human cone photopigments.

Authors:  A E Elsner; L Berk; S A Burns; P R Rosenberg
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements.

Authors:  S Marcos; S Barbero; L Llorente; J Merayo-Lloves
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Parametric representation of Stiles-Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality.

Authors:  R A Applegate; V Lakshminarayanan
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Optical modulation transfer and contrast sensitivity with decentered small pupils in the human eye.

Authors:  P Artal; S Marcos; I Iglesias; D G Green
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  5 in total

1.  Measurement of the photoreceptor pointing in the living chick eye.

Authors:  Maria K Walker; Leonardo Blanco; Rebecca Kivlin; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Carlos Dorronsoro; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Measuring directionality of the retinal reflection with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.

Authors:  Weihua Gao; Ravi S Jonnal; Barry Cense; Omer P Kocaoglu; Qiang Wang; Donald T Miller
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Vision is adapted to the natural level of blur present in the retinal image.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Carlos Dorronsoro; Michael A Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Matching convolved images to optically blurred images on the retina.

Authors:  Sara Aissati; Clara Benedi-Garcia; Maria Vinas; Alberto de Castro; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.