Literature DB >> 23861355

Action, outcome, and value: a dual-system framework for morality.

Fiery Cushman1.   

Abstract

Dual-system approaches to psychology explain the fundamental properties of human judgment, decision making, and behavior across diverse domains. Yet, the appropriate characterization of each system is a source of debate. For instance, a large body of research on moral psychology makes use of the contrast between "emotional" and "rational/cognitive" processes, yet even the chief proponents of this division recognize its shortcomings. Largely independently, research in the computational neurosciences has identified a broad division between two algorithms for learning and choice derived from formal models of reinforcement learning. One assigns value to actions intrinsically based on past experience, while another derives representations of value from an internally represented causal model of the world. This division between action- and outcome-based value representation provides an ideal framework for a dual-system theory in the moral domain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dual-system theory; emotion; morality; reasoning; reinforcement learning

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23861355     DOI: 10.1177/1088868313495594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev        ISSN: 1532-7957


  44 in total

1.  Emotional and Utilitarian Appraisals of Moral Dilemmas Are Encoded in Separate Areas and Integrated in Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Cendri A Hutcherson; Leila Montaser-Kouhsari; James Woodward; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Reinforcement learning improves behaviour from evaluative feedback.

Authors:  Michael L Littman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze.

Authors:  Philip Pärnamets; Petter Johansson; Lars Hall; Christian Balkenius; Michael J Spivey; Daniel C Richardson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Habits without values.

Authors:  Kevin J Miller; Amitai Shenhav; Elliot A Ludvig
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  At the heart of morality lies neuro-visceral integration: lower cardiac vagal tone predicts utilitarian moral judgment.

Authors:  Gewnhi Park; Andreas Kappes; Yeojin Rho; Jay J Van Bavel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Scaling up psychology via Scientific Regret Minimization.

Authors:  Mayank Agrawal; Joshua C Peterson; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cruel to be kind but not cruel for cash: Harm aversion in the dictator game.

Authors:  Pri Perera; Emina Canic; Elliot A Ludvig
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

Review 8.  Bridging cultural sociology and cognitive psychology in three contemporary research programmes.

Authors:  Laura Adler; Bo Yun Park; Xin Xiang; Michèle Lamont
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-11-20

9.  The role of emotion regulation in moral judgment.

Authors:  Chelsea Helion; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.480

10.  Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas.

Authors:  D H Bostyn; J De Keersmaecker; J Van Assche; A Roets
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.