Literature DB >> 26354924

Emotional and Utilitarian Appraisals of Moral Dilemmas Are Encoded in Separate Areas and Integrated in Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex.

Cendri A Hutcherson1, Leila Montaser-Kouhsari2, James Woodward3, Antonio Rangel4.   

Abstract

Moral judgment often requires making difficult tradeoffs (e.g., is it appropriate to torture to save the lives of innocents at risk?). Previous research suggests that both emotional appraisals and more deliberative utilitarian appraisals influence such judgments and that these appraisals often conflict. However, it is unclear how these different types of appraisals are represented in the brain, or how they are integrated into an overall moral judgment. We addressed these questions using an fMRI paradigm in which human subjects provide separate emotional and utilitarian appraisals for different potential actions, and then make difficult moral judgments constructed from combinations of these actions. We found that anterior cingulate, insula, and superior temporal gyrus correlated with emotional appraisals, whereas temporoparietal junction and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex correlated with utilitarian appraisals. Overall moral value judgments were represented in an anterior portion of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Critically, the pattern of responses and functional interactions between these three sets of regions are consistent with a model in which emotional and utilitarian appraisals are computed independently and in parallel, and passed to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex where they are integrated into an overall moral value judgment. Significance statement: Popular accounts of moral judgment often describe it as a battle for control between two systems, one intuitive and emotional, the other rational and utilitarian, engaged in winner-take-all inhibitory competition. Using a novel fMRI paradigm, we identified distinct neural signatures of emotional and utilitarian appraisals and used them to test different models of how they compete for the control of moral behavior. Importantly, we find little support for competitive inhibition accounts. Instead, moral judgments resembled the architecture of simple economic choices: distinct regions represented emotional and utilitarian appraisals independently and passed this information to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex for integration into an overall moral value signal.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3512593-14$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; emotion and cognition; medial prefrontal cortex; moral judgment; temporoparietal junction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26354924      PMCID: PMC4563040          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3402-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

1.  How (and where) does moral judgment work?

Authors:  Joshua Greene; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment.

Authors:  Joshua D Greene; Sylvia A Morelli; Kelly Lowenberg; Leigh E Nystrom; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-12-26

4.  Informatic parcellation of the network involved in the computation of subjective value.

Authors:  John A Clithero; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Time and moral judgment.

Authors:  Renata S Suter; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-02-26

6.  Category-dependent and category-independent goal-value codes in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Daniel McNamee; Antonio Rangel; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Cognitive regulation during decision making shifts behavioral control between ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal value systems.

Authors:  Cendri A Hutcherson; Hilke Plassmann; James J Gross; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Functional imaging of 'theory of mind'

Authors:  Helen L. Gallagher; Christopher D. Frith
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices.

Authors:  Oriel FeldmanHall; Dean Mobbs; Davy Evans; Lucy Hiscox; Lauren Navrady; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-03-09

10.  Deconstructing the brain's moral network: dissociable functionality between the temporoparietal junction and ventro-medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Oriel Feldmanhall; Dean Mobbs; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  17 in total

1.  Neural correlates of conventional and harm/welfare-based moral decision-making.

Authors:  Stuart F White; Hui Zhao; Kelly Kimiko Leong; Judith G Smetana; Larry P Nucci; R James R Blair
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Cognitive regulation alters social and dietary choice by changing attribute representations in domain-general and domain-specific brain circuits.

Authors:  Anita Tusche; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 3.  Advances in modeling learning and decision-making in neuroscience.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; Amitai Shenhav
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  The Neuroscience of Goals and Behavior Change.

Authors:  Elliot T Berkman
Journal:  Consult Psychol J       Date:  2018-03

5.  Self-Control as Value-Based Choice.

Authors:  Elliot T Berkman; Cendri A Hutcherson; Jordan L Livingston; Lauren E Kahn; Michael Inzlicht
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-10-09

6.  Neuro-Computational Foundations of Moral Preferences.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ugazio; Marcus Grueschow; Rafael Polania; Claus Lamm; Philippe Tobler; Christian Ruff
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Dynamic computation of value signals via a common neural network in multi-attribute decision-making.

Authors:  Amadeus Magrabi; Vera U Ludwig; Christian M Stoppel; Lena M Paschke; David Wisniewski; Hauke R Heekeren; Henrik Walter
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.235

8.  Anticipation of guilt for everyday moral transgressions: The role of the anterior insula and the influence of interpersonal psychopathic traits.

Authors:  Ana Seara-Cardoso; Catherine L Sebastian; Eamon McCrory; Lucy Foulkes; Marine Buon; Jonathan P Roiser; Essi Viding
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Perceiving utilitarian gradients: Heart rate variability and self-regulatory effort in the moral dilemma task.

Authors:  Alejandro Rosas; Juan Pablo Bermúdez; Jorge Martínez Cotrina; David Aguilar-Pardo; Juan Carlos Caicedo Mera; Diego Mauricio Aponte-Canencio
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Genetically-Driven Enhancement of Dopaminergic Transmission Affects Moral Acceptability in Females but Not in Males: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Silvia Pellegrini; Sara Palumbo; Caterina Iofrida; Erika Melissari; Giuseppina Rota; Veronica Mariotti; Teresa Anastasio; Andrea Manfrinati; Rino Rumiati; Lorella Lotto; Michela Sarlo; Pietro Pietrini
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.