INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to test the proficiency (accuracy among evaluators) of measured attributes of nerve conduction (NC). METHODS: Expert clinical neurophysiologists, without instruction or consensus development, from 4 different medical centers, independently assessed 8 attributes of NC in 24 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) on consecutive days. RESULTS: No significant intraobserver differences between days 1 and 2 were found, but significant interobserver differences were seen. Use of standard reference values did not correct for these observed differences. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver variability was attributed to differences in performance of NC. It was of sufficient magnitude that it is of concern for the conduct of therapeutic trials. To deal with interrater variability in therapeutic trials, the same electromyographers should perform all NC assessments of individual patients or, preferably, NC procedures should be more standardized. A further trial is needed to test whether such standardization would eliminate interobserver variability.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to test the proficiency (accuracy among evaluators) of measured attributes of nerve conduction (NC). METHODS: Expert clinical neurophysiologists, without instruction or consensus development, from 4 different medical centers, independently assessed 8 attributes of NC in 24 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) on consecutive days. RESULTS: No significant intraobserver differences between days 1 and 2 were found, but significant interobserver differences were seen. Use of standard reference values did not correct for these observed differences. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver variability was attributed to differences in performance of NC. It was of sufficient magnitude that it is of concern for the conduct of therapeutic trials. To deal with interrater variability in therapeutic trials, the same electromyographers should perform all NC assessments of individual patients or, preferably, NC procedures should be more standardized. A further trial is needed to test whether such standardization would eliminate interobserver variability.
Authors: J D England; G S Gronseth; G Franklin; R G Miller; A K Asbury; G T Carter; J A Cohen; M A Fisher; J F Howard; L J Kinsella; N Latov; R A Lewis; P A Low; A J Sumner Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-01-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: V Chaudhry; D R Cornblath; E D Mellits; O Avila; M L Freimer; J D Glass; J Reim; G V Ronnett; S A Quaskey; R W Kuncl Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1991-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: S C Apfel; S Schwartz; B T Adornato; R Freeman; V Biton; M Rendell; A Vinik; M Giuliani; J C Stevens; R Barbano; P J Dyck Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-11-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Peter J Dyck; Carol J Overland; Phillip A Low; William J Litchy; Jenny L Davies; P James B Dyck; Peter C O'Brien; James W Albers; Henning Andersen; Charles F Bolton; John D England; Christopher J Klein; J Gareth Llewelyn; Michelle L Mauermann; James W Russell; Wolfgang Singer; A Gordon Smith; Solomon Tesfaye; Adrian Vella Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: P J Dyck; K M Kratz; J L Karnes; W J Litchy; R Klein; J M Pach; D M Wilson; P C O'Brien; L J Melton; F J Service Journal: Neurology Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Dan Ziegler; Phillip A Low; William J Litchy; Andrew J M Boulton; Aaron I Vinik; Roy Freeman; Rustem Samigullin; Hans Tritschler; Ullrich Munzel; Joachim Maus; Klemens Schütte; Peter J Dyck Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Peter J Dyck; Barbara Argyros; James W Russell; Linde E Gahnstrom; Susan Nalepa; James W Albers; Karen A Lodermeier; Andrew J Zafft; P James B Dyck; Christopher J Klein; William J Litchy; Jenny L Davies; Rickey E Carter; L Joseph Melton Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Xin Chen; Jim Graham; Mohammad A Dabbah; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Georgios Ponirakis; Omar Asghar; Uazman Alam; Andrew Marshall; Hassan Fadavi; Maryam Ferdousi; Shazli Azmi; Mitra Tavakoli; Nathan Efron; Maria Jeziorska; Rayaz A Malik Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Peter J Dyck; Bruce V Taylor; Jenny L Davies; Michelle L Mauermann; William J Litchy; Christopher J Klein; P James B Dyck Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Peter J Dyck; John C Kincaid; P James B Dyck; Vinay Chaudhry; Namita A Goyal; Christina Alves; Hayet Salhi; Janice F Wiesman; Celine Labeyrie; Jessica Robinson-Papp; Márcio Cardoso; Matilde Laura; Katherine Ruzhansky; Andrea Cortese; Thomas H Brannagan; Julie Khoury; Sami Khella; Márcia Waddington-Cruz; João Ferreira; Annabel K Wang; Marcus V Pinto; Samar S Ayache; Merrill D Benson; John L Berk; Teresa Coelho; Michael Polydefkis; Peter Gorevic; David H Adams; Violaine Plante-Bordeneuve; Carol Whelan; Giampaolo Merlini; Stephen Heitner; Brian M Drachman; Isabel Conceição; Christopher J Klein; Morie A Gertz; Elizabeth J Ackermann; Steven G Hughes; Michelle L Mauermann; Rito Bergemann; Karen A Lodermeier; Jenny L Davies; Rickey E Carter; William J Litchy Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: David Adams; Teresa Coelho; Laura Obici; Giampaolo Merlini; Zoia Mincheva; Narupat Suanprasert; Brian R Bettencourt; Jared A Gollob; Pritesh J Gandhi; William J Litchy; Peter J Dyck Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: R Velasco; A A Argyriou; C Marco; S Mariotto; A Stradella; J Hernández; S Pernas; S Ferrari; J Bruna Journal: J Neurol Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 6.682
Authors: Xin Chen; Jim Graham; Mohammad A Dabbah; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Mitra Tavakoli; Rayaz A Malik Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: William J Litchy; James W Albers; James Wolfe; Charles F Bolton; Nancy Walsh; Christopher J Klein; Andrew J Zafft; James W Russell; Melanie Zwirlein; Carol J Overland; Jenny L Davies; Rickey E Carter; Peter J Dyck Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 3.217