Literature DB >> 23859464

Anatomical differences in the human inferior colliculus relate to the perceived valence of musical consonance and dissonance.

Thomas Hans Fritz1,2,3, Wiske Renders2, Karsten Müller4, Paul Schmude4, Marc Leman2, Robert Turner4, Arno Villringer4.   

Abstract

Helmholtz himself speculated about a role of the cochlea in the perception of musical dissonance. Here we indirectly investigated this issue, assessing the valence judgment of musical stimuli with variable consonance/dissonance and presented diotically (exactly the same dissonant signal was presented to both ears) or dichotically (a consonant signal was presented to each ear--both consonant signals were rhythmically identical but differed by a semitone in pitch). Differences in brain organisation underlying inter-subject differences in the percept of dichotically presented dissonance were determined with voxel-based morphometry. Behavioral results showed that diotic dissonant stimuli were perceived as more unpleasant than dichotically presented dissonance, indicating that interactions within the cochlea modulated the valence percept during dissonance. However, the behavioral data also suggested that the dissonance percept did not depend crucially on the cochlea, but also occurred as a result of binaural integration when listening to dichotic dissonance. These results also showed substantial between-participant variations in the valence response to dichotic dissonance. These differences were in a voxel-based morphometry analysis related to differences in gray matter density in the inferior colliculus, which strongly substantiated a key role of the inferior colliculus in consonance/dissonance representation in humans.
© 2013 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aesthetics; dichotic; inferior colliculus; music; pulvinar; roughness

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23859464     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  8 in total

1.  Harmonic calls and indifferent females: no preference for human consonance in an anuran.

Authors:  Karin L Akre; Ximena Bernal; A Stanley Rand; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Neuroplasticity beyond Sounds: Neural Adaptations Following Long-Term Musical Aesthetic Experiences.

Authors:  Mark Reybrouck; Elvira Brattico
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2015-03-23

3.  From understanding to appreciating music cross-culturally.

Authors:  Thomas Hans Fritz; Paul Schmude; Sebastian Jentschke; Angela D Friederici; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Band Effect-Physically Strenuous Music Making Increases Esthetic Appreciation of Music.

Authors:  Thomas H Fritz; Lydia Schneider; Arno Villringer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Sensory cortical response to uncertainty and low salience during recognition of affective cues in musical intervals.

Authors:  Fernando Bravo; Ian Cross; Emmanuel Andreas Stamatakis; Martin Rohrmeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fetal facial expression in response to intravaginal music emission.

Authors:  Marisa López-Teijón; Álex García-Faura; Alberto Prats-Galino
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-11

7.  Dissonance encoding in human inferior colliculus covaries with individual differences in dislike of dissonant music.

Authors:  Seung-Goo Kim; Jöran Lepsien; Thomas Hans Fritz; Toralf Mildner; Karsten Mueller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The pleasantness of sensory dissonance is mediated by musical style and expertise.

Authors:  Tudor Popescu; Monja P Neuser; Markus Neuwirth; Fernando Bravo; Wolfgang Mende; Oren Boneh; Fabian C Moss; Martin Rohrmeier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.