Literature DB >> 23859421

Spectral signatures of viewing a needle approaching one's body when anticipating pain.

Marion Höfle1,2, Ulrich Pomper3,2, Michael Hauck3,4, Andreas K Engel3, Daniel Senkowski3,2.   

Abstract

When viewing the needle of a syringe approaching your skin, anticipation of a painful prick may lead to increased arousal. How this anticipation is reflected in neural oscillatory activity and how it relates to activity within the autonomic nervous system is thus far unknown. Recently, we found that viewing needle pricks compared with Q-tip touches increases the pupil dilation response (PDR) and perceived unpleasantness of electrical stimuli. Here, we used high-density electroencephalography to investigate whether anticipatory oscillatory activity predicts the unpleasantness of electrical stimuli and PDR while viewing a needle approaching a hand that is perceived as one's own. We presented video clips of needle pricks and Q-tip touches, and delivered spatiotemporally aligned painful and nonpainful intracutaneous electrical stimuli. The perceived unpleasantness of electrical stimuli and the PDR were enhanced when participants viewed needle pricks compared with Q-tip touches. Source reconstruction using linear beamforming revealed reduced alpha-band activity in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and fusiform gyrus before the onset of electrical stimuli when participants viewed needle pricks compared with Q-tip touches. Moreover, alpha-band activity in the PCC predicted PDR on a single trial level. The anticipatory reduction of alpha-band activity in the PCC may reflect a neural mechanism that serves to protect the body from forthcoming harm by facilitating the preparation of adequate defense responses.
© 2013 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autonomic nervous system; beamforming; electroencephalography; human; oscillations; pupil dilation response

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23859421     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  11 in total

1.  Source-space EEG neurofeedback links subjective experience with brain activity during effortless awareness meditation.

Authors:  Remko van Lutterveld; Sean D Houlihan; Prasanta Pal; Matthew D Sacchet; Cinque McFarlane-Blake; Payal R Patel; John S Sullivan; Alex Ossadtchi; Susan Druker; Clemens Bauer; Judson A Brewer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Collateral pathways from the ventromedial hypothalamus mediate defensive behaviors.

Authors:  Li Wang; Irene Z Chen; Dayu Lin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Posterior Cingulate Cortical Response to Active Avoidance Mediates the Relationship between Punishment Sensitivity and Problem Drinking.

Authors:  Thang M Le; Simon Zhornitsky; Wuyi Wang; Jaime Ide; Sheng Zhang; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A magnetoencephalography study of visual processing of pain anticipation.

Authors:  Andre G Machado; Raghavan Gopalakrishnan; Ela B Plow; Richard C Burgess; John C Mosher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Prior exposure to extreme pain alters neural response to pain in others.

Authors:  Moranne Eidelman-Rothman; Abraham Goldstein; Omri Weisman; Inna Schneiderman; Orna Zagoory-Sharon; Jean Decety; Ruth Feldman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Intense pain influences the cortical processing of visual stimuli projected onto the sensitized skin.

Authors:  Diana M E Torta; Emanuel N Van Den Broeke; Lieve Filbrich; Benvenuto Jacob; Julien Lambert; André Mouraux
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.926

7.  The impact of visual gaze direction on auditory object tracking.

Authors:  Ulrich Pomper; Maria Chait
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Painless injections-a possibility with low level laser therapy.

Authors:  Bhagyashree Jagtap; Kalyani Bhate; Surabhi Magoo; Santhoshkumar S N; Kunal Suhas Gajendragadkar; Sagar Joshi
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-30

9.  Looking at the hand modulates the brain responses to nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory stimuli but does not necessarily modulate their perception.

Authors:  Diana M Torta; Valéry Legrain; André Mouraux
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Viewing the body modulates both pain sensations and pain responses.

Authors:  Brianna Beck; Elisabetta Làdavas; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.