Remko van Lutterveld1, Sean D Houlihan2, Prasanta Pal1, Matthew D Sacchet3, Cinque McFarlane-Blake1, Payal R Patel1, John S Sullivan1, Alex Ossadtchi4, Susan Druker1, Clemens Bauer2, Judson A Brewer5. 1. Center for Mindfulness, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. 2. Center for Mindfulness, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3. Neurosciences Program and Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 4. Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation; Laboratory of Control of Complex Systems, Institute of Problems of Mechanical Engineering, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia. 5. Center for Mindfulness, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: Judson.Brewer@umassmed.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Meditation is increasingly showing beneficial effects for psychiatric disorders. However, learning to meditate is not straightforward as there are no easily discernible outward signs of performance and thus no direct feedback is possible. As meditation has been found to correlate with posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) activity, we tested whether source-space EEG neurofeedback from the PCC followed the subjective experience of effortless awareness (a major component of meditation), and whether participants could volitionally control the signal. METHODS: Sixteen novice meditators and sixteen experienced meditators participated in the study. Novice meditators were briefly trained to perform a basic meditation practice to induce the subjective experience of effortless awareness in a progressively more challenging neurofeedback test-battery. Experienced meditators performed a self-selected meditation practice to induce this state in the same test-battery. Neurofeedback was provided based on gamma-band (40-57Hz) PCC activity extracted using a beamformer algorithm. Associations between PCC activity and the subjective experience of effortless awareness were assessed by verbal probes. RESULTS: Both groups reported that decreased PCC activity corresponded with effortless awareness (P<0.0025 for each group), with high median confidence ratings (novices: 8 on a 0-10 Likert scale; experienced: 9). Both groups showed high moment-to-moment median correspondence ratings between PCC activity and subjective experience of effortless awareness (novices: 8, experienced: 9). Both groups were able to volitionally control the PCC signal in the direction associated with effortless awareness by practicing effortless awareness meditation (novices: median % of time=77.97, P=0.001; experienced: 89.83, P<0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the feasibility of using EEG neurofeedback to link an objective measure of brain activity with the subjective experience of effortless awareness, and suggest potential utility of this paradigm as a tool for meditation training.
BACKGROUND: Meditation is increasingly showing beneficial effects for psychiatric disorders. However, learning to meditate is not straightforward as there are no easily discernible outward signs of performance and thus no direct feedback is possible. As meditation has been found to correlate with posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) activity, we tested whether source-space EEG neurofeedback from the PCC followed the subjective experience of effortless awareness (a major component of meditation), and whether participants could volitionally control the signal. METHODS: Sixteen novice meditators and sixteen experienced meditators participated in the study. Novice meditators were briefly trained to perform a basic meditation practice to induce the subjective experience of effortless awareness in a progressively more challenging neurofeedback test-battery. Experienced meditators performed a self-selected meditation practice to induce this state in the same test-battery. Neurofeedback was provided based on gamma-band (40-57Hz) PCC activity extracted using a beamformer algorithm. Associations between PCC activity and the subjective experience of effortless awareness were assessed by verbal probes. RESULTS: Both groups reported that decreased PCC activity corresponded with effortless awareness (P<0.0025 for each group), with high median confidence ratings (novices: 8 on a 0-10 Likert scale; experienced: 9). Both groups showed high moment-to-moment median correspondence ratings between PCC activity and subjective experience of effortless awareness (novices: 8, experienced: 9). Both groups were able to volitionally control the PCC signal in the direction associated with effortless awareness by practicing effortless awareness meditation (novices: median % of time=77.97, P=0.001; experienced: 89.83, P<0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the feasibility of using EEG neurofeedback to link an objective measure of brain activity with the subjective experience of effortless awareness, and suggest potential utility of this paradigm as a tool for meditation training.
Authors: Judson A Brewer; Patrick D Worhunsky; Jeremy R Gray; Yi-Yuan Tang; Jochen Weber; Hedy Kober Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Malia F Mason; Michael I Norton; John D Van Horn; Daniel M Wegner; Scott T Grafton; C Neil Macrae Journal: Science Date: 2007-01-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Emma M Whitham; Kenneth J Pope; Sean P Fitzgibbon; Trent Lewis; C Richard Clark; Stephen Loveless; Marita Broberg; Angus Wallace; Dylan DeLosAngeles; Peter Lillie; Andrew Hardy; Rik Fronsko; Alyson Pulbrook; John O Willoughby Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Madhav Goyal; Sonal Singh; Erica M S Sibinga; Neda F Gould; Anastasia Rowland-Seymour; Ritu Sharma; Zackary Berger; Dana Sleicher; David D Maron; Hasan M Shihab; Padmini D Ranasinghe; Shauna Linn; Shonali Saha; Eric B Bass; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: James R Stieger; Stephen Engel; Haiteng Jiang; Christopher C Cline; Mary Jo Kreitzer; Bin He Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 5.357