Literature DB >> 23859275

Effect of chitosan incorporation and scaffold geometry on chondrocyte function in dense collagen type I hydrogels.

Florencia Chicatun1, Claudio E Pedraza, Naser Muja, Chiara E Ghezzi, Marc D McKee, Showan N Nazhat.   

Abstract

Tissue engineering approaches for articular cartilage (AC) repair using collagen type I (Coll)-based hydrogels are limited by their low collagen fibril density (CFD; <0.5 wt%) and their poor capacity to support chondrocyte differentiation. Chitosan (CTS) is a well-characterized polysaccharide that mimics the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) present in native AC extracellular matrix and exhibits chondroprotective properties. Here dense Coll/CTS hydrogel discs (16 mm diameter, 140-250 μm thickness) with CFD (∼6 wt%) approaching that of AC were developed to investigate the effect of CTS content on the growth and differentiation of three-dimensionally seeded RCJ3.1C5.18 chondroprogenitor cells. Compared to dense Coll alone, cells seeded within Coll/CTS showed increased viability and metabolic activity, as well as a decrease in cell-mediated gel contraction. Immunohistochemistry for collagen type II, in combination with Safranin O staining and GAG quantification, indicated greater chondroprogenitor differentiation within Coll/CTS, compared to cells seeded within Coll alone. The complex interplay between scaffold geometry, microstructure, composition, mechanical properties and cell function was further evaluated by rolling dense planar sheets to prepare cylindrically shaped constructs having clinically relevant diameters (3-5 mm diameter, 9 mm height). The compressive modulus of the cylindrically shaped constructs decreased significantly after 7 days in culture, and remained unchanged up to 21 days for each scaffold composition. Unlike Coll, cells seeded within Coll/CTS showed greater viability along the entire radial extent of the cylindrical rolls and increased GAG production at each time point. While GAG content decreased over time and reduced cell viability was observed within the core region of all cylindrical rolls, the incorporation of CTS diminished both these effects. In summary, these findings provide insight into the challenges involved when scaling up scaffolds designed and optimised in vitro for tissue repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23859275      PMCID: PMC3856934          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  46 in total

Review 1.  The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Ivan Martin; David Wendt; Michael Heberer
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 19.536

2.  Contraction-induced Mmp13 and -14 expression by goat articular chondrocytes in collagen type I but not type II gels.

Authors:  Agnes D Berendsen; Lucienne A Vonk; Behrouz Zandieh-Doulabi; Vincent Everts; Ruud A Bank
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.963

3.  Effect of multiple unconfined compression on cellular dense collagen scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Malak Bitar; Vehid Salih; Robert A Brown; Showan N Nazhat
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Photochemically cross-linked collagen gels as three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Shinichi Ibusuki; Gerrit J Halbesma; Mark A Randolph; Robert W Redmond; Irene E Kochevar; Thomas J Gill
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-08

5.  Synthetic polymers seeded with chondrocytes provide a template for new cartilage formation.

Authors:  C A Vacanti; R Langer; B Schloo; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Comparative phenotypic analysis of articular chondrocytes cultured within type I or type II collagen scaffolds.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Freyria; Marie-Claire Ronzière; Delphine Cortial; Laurent Galois; Daniel Hartmann; Daniel Herbage; Frédéric Mallein-Gerin
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Matrix collagen type and pore size influence behaviour of seeded canine chondrocytes.

Authors:  S Nehrer; H A Breinan; A Ramappa; G Young; S Shortkroff; L K Louie; C B Sledge; I V Yannas; M Spector
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Osteoid-mimicking dense collagen/chitosan hybrid gels.

Authors:  Florencia Chicatun; Claudio E Pedraza; Chiara E Ghezzi; Benedetto Marelli; Mari T Kaartinen; Marc D McKee; Showan N Nazhat
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 9.  Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects.

Authors:  E B Hunziker
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Discrepancies between metabolic activity and DNA content as tool to assess cell proliferation in cancer research.

Authors:  Verena M C Quent; Daniela Loessner; Thor Friis; Johannes C Reichert; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.310

View more
  4 in total

1.  An In Vitro Thrombolysis Study Using a Mixture of Fast-Acting and Slower Release Microspheres.

Authors:  Hoai X Nguyen; Edgar A O'Rear
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Clinical applications of naturally derived biopolymer-based scaffolds for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Whitney L Stoppel; Chiara E Ghezzi; Stephanie L McNamara; Lauren D Black; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Collagen Scaffolds in Cartilage Tissue Engineering and Relevant Approaches for Future Development.

Authors:  Vincent Irawan; Tzu-Cheng Sung; Akon Higuchi; Toshiyuki Ikoma
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.169

4.  A tissue-mimetic nano-fibrillar hybrid injectable hydrogel for potential soft tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Neda Latifi; Meisam Asgari; Hojatollah Vali; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.