Literature DB >> 23855630

Estimates of autozygosity derived from runs of homozygosity: empirical evidence from selected cattle populations.

M Ferenčaković1, E Hamzić, B Gredler, T R Solberg, G Klemetsdal, I Curik, J Sölkner.   

Abstract

Using genome-wide SNP data, we calculated genomic inbreeding coefficients (FROH  > 1  Mb , FROH  > 2 Mb , FROH  > 8 Mb and FROH  > 16 Mb ) derived from runs of homozygosity (ROH) of different lengths (>1, >2, >8 and > 16 Mb) as well as from levels of homozygosity (FHOM ). We compared these values of inbreeding coefficients with those calculated from pedigrees (FPED ) of 1422 bulls comprising Brown Swiss (304), Fleckvieh (502), Norwegian Red (499) and Tyrol Grey (117) cattle breeds. For all four breeds, population inbreeding levels estimated by the genomic inbreeding coefficients FROH  > 8 Mb and FROH  > 16 Mb were similar to the levels estimated from pedigrees. The lowest values were obtained for Fleckvieh (FPED  = 0.014, FROH  > 8 Mb  = 0.019 and FROH  > 16 Mb  = 0.008); the highest, for Brown Swiss (FPED  = 0.048, FROH  > 8 Mb  = 0.074 and FROH  > 16 Mb  = 0.037). In contrast, inbreeding estimates based on the genomic coefficients FROH  > 1 Mb and FROH  > 2 Mb were considerably higher than pedigree-derived estimates. Standard deviations of genomic inbreeding coefficients were, on average, 1.3-1.7-fold higher than those obtained from pedigrees. Pearson correlations between genomic and pedigree inbreeding coefficients ranged from 0.50 to 0.62 in Norwegian Red (lowest correlations) and from 0.64 to 0.72 in Tyrol Grey (highest correlations). We conclude that the proportion of the genome present in ROH provides a good indication of inbreeding levels and that analysis based on ROH length can indicate the relative amounts of autozygosity due to recent and remote ancestors.
© 2012 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cattle; genome inbreeding; pedigree; runs of homozygosity

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23855630     DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  66 in total

1.  The use of runs of homozygosity for estimation of recent inbreeding in Holstein cattle.

Authors:  A Gurgul; T Szmatoła; P Topolski; I Jasielczuk; K Żukowski; M Bugno-Poniewierska
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Inferring Individual Inbreeding and Demographic History from Segments of Identity by Descent in Ficedula Flycatcher Genome Sequences.

Authors:  Marty Kardos; Anna Qvarnström; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Trait-specific long-term consequences of genomic selection in beef cattle.

Authors:  Haroldo Henrique de Rezende Neves; Roberto Carvalheiro; Sandra Aidar de Queiroz
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Genomic consequences of a century of inbreeding and isolation in the Danish wild boar population.

Authors:  Beril Yıldız; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Christina Hvilsom; Mirte Bosse
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Effective population size, extended linkage disequilibrium and signatures of selection in the rare dog breed lundehund.

Authors:  Sophia Pfahler; Ottmar Distl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genome-wide estimates of coancestry, inbreeding and effective population size in the Spanish Holstein population.

Authors:  Silvia Teresa Rodríguez-Ramilo; Jesús Fernández; Miguel Angel Toro; Delfino Hernández; Beatriz Villanueva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.

Authors:  Qianqian Zhang; Mario P L Calus; Bernt Guldbrandtsen; Mogens S Lund; Goutam Sahana
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  A Mix of Old British and Modern European Breeds: Genomic Prediction of Breed Composition of Smallholder Pigs in Uganda.

Authors:  Brian Martin Babigumira; Johann Sölkner; Gábor Mészáros; Christina Pfeiffer; Craig R G Lewis; Emily Ouma; Maria Wurzinger; Karen Marshall
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Genome-Wide Patterns of Homozygosity Reveal the Conservation Status in Five Italian Goat Populations.

Authors:  Salvatore Mastrangelo; Rosalia Di Gerlando; Maria Teresa Sardina; Anna Maria Sutera; Angelo Moscarelli; Marco Tolone; Matteo Cortellari; Donata Marletta; Paola Crepaldi; Baldassare Portolano
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Ethiopian indigenous goats offer insights into past and recent demographic dynamics and local adaptation in sub-Saharan African goats.

Authors:  Getinet M Tarekegn; Negar Khayatzadeh; Bin Liu; Sarah Osama; Aynalem Haile; Barbara Rischkowsky; Wenguang Zhang; Kassahun Tesfaye; Tadelle Dessie; Okeyo A Mwai; Appolinaire Djikeng; Joram M Mwacharo
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.