Literature DB >> 23855549

Learned predictiveness influences rapid attentional capture: evidence from the dot probe task.

Mike E Le Pelley1, Miguel Vadillo, David Luque.   

Abstract

Attentional theories of associative learning and categorization propose that learning about the predictiveness of a stimulus influences the amount of attention that is paid to that stimulus. Three experiments tested this idea by looking at the extent to which stimuli that had previously been experienced as predictive or nonpredictive in a categorization task were able to capture attention in a dot probe task. Consistent with certain attentional theories of learning, responses to the dot probe were faster when it appeared in a location cued by a predictive stimulus compared to a location cued by a nonpredictive stimulus. This result was obtained only with short (250-ms or 350-ms) but not long (1,000-ms) delays between onset of the stimuli and the dot probe, suggesting that the observed spatial cuing effect reflects the operation of a relatively rapid, automatic process. These findings are consistent with the approach to the relationship between attention and learning taken by the class of models exemplified by Mackintosh's (1975) theory. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23855549     DOI: 10.1037/a0033700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  11 in total

1.  Evidence for online processing during causal learning.

Authors:  Pei-Pei Liu; Christian C Luhmann
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Learned value and predictiveness affect gaze but not figure assignment.

Authors:  Sandersan Onie; Mary A Peterson; Mike Le Pelley; Steven B Most
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Selectivity in associative learning: a cognitive stage framework for blocking and cue competition phenomena.

Authors:  Yannick Boddez; Kim Haesen; Frank Baeyens; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-12

4.  Introducing a Method for Calculating the Allocation of Attention in a Cognitive "Two-Armed Bandit" Procedure: Probability Matching Gives Way to Maximizing.

Authors:  Gene M Heyman; Katherine A Grisanzio; Victor Liang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-08

5.  Ambiguity produces attention shifts in category learning.

Authors:  Miguel A Vadillo; Cristina Orgaz; David Luque; James Byron Nelson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 6.  The Dopamine Prediction Error: Contributions to Associative Models of Reward Learning.

Authors:  Helen M Nasser; Donna J Calu; Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Melissa J Sharpe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-22

7.  Previously Reward-Associated Stimuli Capture Spatial Attention in the Absence of Changes in the Corresponding Sensory Representations as Measured with MEG.

Authors:  Lev Tankelevitch; Eelke Spaak; Matthew F S Rushworth; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Learned predictiveness acquired through experience prevails over the influence of conflicting verbal instructions in rapid selective attention.

Authors:  Pedro L Cobos; Miguel A Vadillo; David Luque; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Shape shifting: Local landmarks interfere with navigation by, and recognition of, global shape.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Changes of Attention during Value-Based Reversal Learning Are Tracked by N2pc and Feedback-Related Negativity.

Authors:  Mariann Oemisch; Marcus R Watson; Thilo Womelsdorf; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.