Literature DB >> 25488021

Evidence for online processing during causal learning.

Pei-Pei Liu1, Christian C Luhmann.   

Abstract

Many models of learning describe both the end product of learning (e.g., causal judgments) and the cognitive mechanisms that unfold on a trial-by-trial basis. However, the methods employed in the literature typically provide only indirect evidence about the unfolding cognitive processes. Here, we utilized a simultaneous secondary task to measure cognitive processing during a straightforward causal-learning task. The results from three experiments demonstrated that covariation information is not subject to uniform cognitive processing. Instead, we observed systematic variation in the processing dedicated to individual pieces of covariation information. In particular, observations that are inconsistent with previously presented covariation information appear to elicit greater cognitive processing than do observations that are consistent with previously presented covariation information. In addition, the degree of cognitive processing appears to be driven by learning per se, rather than by nonlearning processes such as memory and attention. Overall, these findings suggest that monitoring learning processes at a finer level may provide useful psychological insights into the nature of learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25488021     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-014-0156-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  30 in total

Review 1.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.

Authors:  Daniel Kahneman
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2003-09

2.  Learning-induced modulations of the stimulus-preceding negativity.

Authors:  Joaquín Morís; David Luque; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Interference between outcomes, spontaneous recovery, and context effects as measured by a cued response reaction time task: evidence for associative retrieval models.

Authors:  Estrella González-Martín; Pedro L Cobos; Joaquín Morís; Francisco J López
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2012-08-20

4.  Contingency judgment: primacy effects and attention decrement.

Authors:  J F Yates; S P Curley
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1986-08

5.  Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs.

Authors:  L J Chapman; J P Chapman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1969-06

6.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Evidence that a transient but cognitively demanding process underlies forward blocking.

Authors:  Pei-Pei Liu; Christian C Luhmann
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning.

Authors:  M E Le Pelley; Tom Beesley; Oren Griffiths
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2011-04

9.  Expectations and interpretations during causal learning.

Authors:  Christian C Luhmann; Woo-Kyoung Ahn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Augmentation in contingency learning under time pressure.

Authors:  Miguel A Vadillo; Helena Matute
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2009-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.