Literature DB >> 23855547

Attempting to answer a meaningful question enhances subsequent learning even when feedback is delayed.

Nate Kornell1.   

Abstract

Attempting to retrieve information from memory enhances subsequent learning even if the retrieval attempt is unsuccessful. Recent evidence suggests that this benefit materializes only if subsequent study occurs immediately after the retrieval attempt. Previous studies have prompted retrieval using a cue (e.g., whale-???) that has no intrinsic answer. Experiment 1 replicated prior word pair studies, but in Experiment 2, when participants learned meaningful trivia questions, testing enhanced learning even when subsequent study was delayed. Even in Experiment 3, when subsequent study was delayed by up to 24 hr, tests enhanced learning on a final test another 24 hr later. These findings may give comfort to educators who worry that asking a question or giving a test, on which students inevitably make mistakes, impairs learning if feedback is not immediate. They also suggest that there is a consensus in the literature thus far: Questions with rich semantic content enhance subsequent learning even when feedback is delayed, but less meaningful questions without an intrinsic answer enhance learning only when feedback is immediate. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23855547     DOI: 10.1037/a0033699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  15 in total

1.  Answering a factual question today increases one's confidence in the same answer tomorrow - independent of fluency.

Authors:  Joshua L Fiechter; Nate Kornell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

2.  Memory and availability-biased metacognitive illusions for flags of varying familiarity.

Authors:  Adam B Blake; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-02

3.  Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information.

Authors:  Jeri L Little; Elizabeth Ligon Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-10

4.  Test-enhanced learning versus errorless learning in aphasia rehabilitation: testing competing psychological principles.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Myrna F Schwartz; Katherine A Rawson; Kelly Garvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The perceptions of dental hygiene students about an asynchronous oral biology course.

Authors:  Nazlee Sharmin; Ava K Chow
Journal:  Can J Dent Hyg       Date:  2022-06-01

6.  Errorful and errorless learning: The impact of cue-target constraint in learning from errors.

Authors:  Emma K Bridger; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08

7.  Waiting for feedback helps if you want to know the answer: the role of curiosity in the delay-of-feedback benefit.

Authors:  Kellie M Mullaney; Shana K Carpenter; Courtney Grotenhuis; Steven Burianek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

8.  Why does guessing incorrectly enhance, rather than impair, retention?

Authors:  Veronica X Yan; Yue Yu; Michael A Garcia; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

9.  The influence of evaluative right/wrong feedback on phonological and semantic processes in word learning.

Authors:  Saloni Krishnan; Elise Sellars; Helena Wood; Dorothy V M Bishop; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Enhanced memory for context associated with corrective feedback: evidence for episodic processes in errorful learning.

Authors:  Amy A Overman; Joseph D W Stephens; Mary F Bernhardt
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2021-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.