Literature DB >> 23852586

Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, recreational physical activity and breast cancer risk.

Lauren E McCullough1, Regina M Santella, Rebecca J Cleveland, Robert C Millikan, Andrew F Olshan, Kari E North, Patrick T Bradshaw, Sybil M Eng, Mary Beth Terry, Jing Shen, Katherine D Crew, Pavel Rossner, Susan L Teitelbaum, Alfred I Neugut, Marilie D Gammon.   

Abstract

The mechanisms driving the inverse association between recreational physical activity (RPA) and breast cancer risk are complex. While exercise is associated with increased reactive oxygen species production it may also improve damage repair systems, particularly those that operate on single-strand breaks including base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER) and mismatch repair (MMR). Of these repair pathways, the role of MMR in breast carcinogenesis is least investigated. Polymorphisms in MMR or other DNA repair gene variants may modify the association between RPA and breast cancer incidence. We investigated the individual and joint effects of variants in three MMR pathway genes (MSH3, MLH1 and MSH2) on breast cancer occurrence using resources from the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project. We additionally characterized interactions between RPA and genetic polymorphisms in MMR, BER and NER pathways. We found statistically significant multiplicative interactions (p < 0.05) between MSH2 and MLH1, as well as between postmenopausal RPA and four variants in DNA repair (XPC-Ala499Val, XPF-Arg415Gln, XPG-Asp1104His and MLH1-lle219Val). Significant risk reductions were observed among highly active women with the common genotype for XPC (OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.81) and XPF (OR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.87), as well as among active women who carried at least one variant allele in XPG (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.77) and MLH1 (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.71). Our data show that women with minor alleles in both MSH2 and MLH1 could be at increased breast cancer risk. RPA may be modified by genes in the DNA repair pathway, and merit further investigation.
© 2013 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA repair; breast cancer; epidemiology; mismatch repair; physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23852586      PMCID: PMC3830595          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  46 in total

Review 1.  Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk.

Authors:  Ellen L Goode; Cornelia M Ulrich; John D Potter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Changes in blood glutathione concentrations, and in erythrocyte glutathione reductase and glutathione S-transferase activity after running training and after participation in contests.

Authors:  C T Evelo; N G Palmen; Y Artur; G M Janssen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

3.  Polymorphisms of the DNA mismatch repair gene HMSH2 in breast cancer occurence and progression.

Authors:  Tomasz Poplawski; Marek Zadrozny; Agnieszka Kolacinska; Jan Rykala; Zbigniew Morawiec; Janusz Blasiak
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Destabilization of tracts of simple repetitive DNA in yeast by mutations affecting DNA mismatch repair.

Authors:  M Strand; T A Prolla; R M Liskay; T D Petes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair genes and DNA repair capacity phenotype in sisters discordant for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Manisha Desai; Meenakshi Agrawal; David O Kennedy; Ruby T Senie; Regina M Santella; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Adaptation to exercise-induced oxidative stress: from muscle to brain.

Authors:  Z Radak; A W Taylor; H Ohno; S Goto
Journal:  Exerc Immunol Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.308

7.  Myeloperoxidase genotype, fruit and vegetable consumption, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Jiyoung Ahn; Marilie D Gammon; Regina M Santella; Mia M Gaudet; Julie A Britton; Susan L Teitelbaum; Mary Beth Terry; Alfred I Neugut; P David Josephy; Christine B Ambrosone
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Microsatellite instability and alteration of the expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kathy Qi Cai; Constance Albarracin; Daniel Rosen; Rocksheng Zhong; Wenxin Zheng; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Russell Broaddus; Jinsong Liu
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer.

Authors:  C J Yee; N Roodi; C S Verrier; F F Parl
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Microsatellite instability in early sporadic breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Shaw; T Walsh; S A Chappell; N Carey; K Johnson; R A Walker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Association between ERCC5 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Nari Na; Eer Dun; Lidong Ren; Guoxin Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-03-01

2.  Data on Single Nucleotide Polymorphism of DNA Repair Genes and Breast Cancer Risk from Poland.

Authors:  Beata Smolarz; Magdalena Bryś; Ewa Forma; Marek Zadrożny; Jan Bieńkiewicz; Hanna Romanowicz
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair and oxidative stress pathways may modify the association between body size and postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Lauren E McCullough; Sybil M Eng; Patrick T Bradshaw; Rebecca J Cleveland; Susan E Steck; Mary Beth Terry; Jing Shen; Katherine D Crew; Pavel Rossner; Jiyoung Ahn; Christine B Ambrosone; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Regina M Santella; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  MSH3 rs26279 polymorphism increases cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Kai Miao; Li-Ping Chen; Dong-Ping Cai; Wei-Ju Kong; Li Xiao; Jie Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 5.  Sun exposure, sunbeds and sunscreens and melanoma. What are the controversies?

Authors:  Veronique Bataille
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  XRCC1 and OGG1 Gene Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Authors:  Ali Sanjari Moghaddam; Milad Nazarzadeh; Rezvan Noroozi; Hossein Darvish; Alireza Mosavi Jarrahi
Journal:  Iran J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-02-23

7.  Association Between ERCC1 rs3212986 and ERCC2/XPD rs1799793 and OS in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Elisa Boldrin; Sandro Malacrida; Enrica Rumiato; Giorgio Battaglia; Alberto Ruol; Alberto Amadori; Daniela Saggioro
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  MiR-942 regulates the function of breast cancer cell by targeting FOXA2.

Authors:  Jinku Zhang; Zhiqiang Zhang; Jirui Sun; Qiushuang Ma; Wenming Zhao; Xue Chen; Haizhi Qiao
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Polymorphisms in DNA repair pathway genes and ABCG2 gene in advanced colorectal cancer: correlation with tumor characteristics and clinical outcome in oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Hu; Wenyan Qin; Shanqiong Li; Miao He; Yilin Wang; Shu Guan; Haishan Zhao; Weifan Yao; Minjie Wei; Mingyan Liu; Huizhe Wu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.989

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.