AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 2 diabetes is a chronic, heterogeneous disease and a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. The underlying mechanisms leading to progression to type 2 diabetes are not fully understood and genetic tools may help to identify important pathways of glycaemic deterioration. METHODS: Using prospective data on American Indians from the Strong Heart Family Study, we identified 373 individuals defined as progressors (diabetes incident cases), 566 individuals with transitory impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and 1,011 controls (normal fasting glycaemia at all visits). We estimated the heritability (h(2)) of the traits and the evidence for association with 16 known variants identified in type 2 diabetes genome-wide association studies. RESULTS: We noted high h(2) for diabetes progression (h(2) = 0.65 ± 0.16, p = 2.7 × 10(-6)) but little contribution of genetic factors to transitory IFG (h(2) = 0.09 ± 0.10, p = 0.19) for models adjusted for multiple risk factors. At least three variants (in WFS1, TSPAN8 and THADA) were nominally associated with diabetes progression in age- and sex-adjusted analyses with estimates showing the same direction of effects as reported in the discovery European ancestry studies. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our findings do not exclude these loci for diabetes susceptibility in American Indians and suggest phenotypic heterogeneity of the IFG trait, which may have implications for genetic studies when diagnosis is based on a single time-point measure.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 2 diabetes is a chronic, heterogeneous disease and a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. The underlying mechanisms leading to progression to type 2 diabetes are not fully understood and genetic tools may help to identify important pathways of glycaemic deterioration. METHODS: Using prospective data on American Indians from the Strong Heart Family Study, we identified 373 individuals defined as progressors (diabetes incident cases), 566 individuals with transitory impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and 1,011 controls (normal fasting glycaemia at all visits). We estimated the heritability (h(2)) of the traits and the evidence for association with 16 known variants identified in type 2 diabetes genome-wide association studies. RESULTS: We noted high h(2) for diabetes progression (h(2) = 0.65 ± 0.16, p = 2.7 × 10(-6)) but little contribution of genetic factors to transitory IFG (h(2) = 0.09 ± 0.10, p = 0.19) for models adjusted for multiple risk factors. At least three variants (in WFS1, TSPAN8 and THADA) were nominally associated with diabetes progression in age- and sex-adjusted analyses with estimates showing the same direction of effects as reported in the discovery European ancestry studies. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our findings do not exclude these loci for diabetes susceptibility in American Indians and suggest phenotypic heterogeneity of the IFG trait, which may have implications for genetic studies when diagnosis is based on a single time-point measure.
Authors: M I Harris; K M Flegal; C C Cowie; M S Eberhardt; D E Goldstein; R R Little; H M Wiedmeyer; D D Byrd-Holt Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: G A Walford; T Green; B Neale; T Isakova; J I Rotter; S F A Grant; C S Fox; J S Pankow; J G Wilson; J B Meigs; D S Siscovick; D W Bowden; M J Daly; J C Florez Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2011-10-29 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Hong Wang; Nawar M Shara; Darren Calhoun; Jason G Umans; Elisa T Lee; Barbara V Howard Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: X R Pan; G W Li; Y H Hu; J X Wang; W Y Yang; Z X An; Z X Hu; J Lin; J Z Xiao; H B Cao; P A Liu; X G Jiang; Y Y Jiang; J P Wang; H Zheng; H Zhang; P H Bennett; B V Howard Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Robert L Hanson; Clifton Bogardus; David Duggan; Sayuko Kobes; Michele Knowlton; Aniello M Infante; Leslie Marovich; Deb Benitez; Leslie J Baier; William C Knowler Journal: Diabetes Date: 2007-09-10 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Rong Rong; Robert L Hanson; Daniel Ortiz; Christopher Wiedrich; Sayuko Kobes; William C Knowler; Clifton Bogardus; Leslie J Baier Journal: Diabetes Date: 2008-11-13 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Sandra L Laston; V Saroja Voruganti; Karin Haack; Vallabh O Shah; Arlene Bobelu; Jeanette Bobelu; Donica Ghahate; Antonia M Harford; Susan S Paine; Francesca Tentori; Shelley A Cole; Jean W MacCluer; Anthony G Comuzzie; Philip G Zager Journal: Front Genet Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Alexia Cardona; Luca Pagani; Tiago Antao; Daniel J Lawson; Christina A Eichstaedt; Bryndis Yngvadottir; Ma Than Than Shwe; Joseph Wee; Irene Gallego Romero; Srilakshmi Raj; Mait Metspalu; Richard Villems; Eske Willerslev; Chris Tyler-Smith; Boris A Malyarchuk; Miroslava V Derenko; Toomas Kivisild Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Poojitha Balakrishnan; Dhananjay Vaidya; V Saroja Voruganti; Karin Haack; Jack W Kent; Kari E North; Sandra Laston; Barbara V Howard; Jason G Umans; Elisa T Lee; Lyle G Best; Jean W MacCluer; Shelley A Cole; Ana Navas-Acien; Nora Franceschini Journal: Front Genet Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 4.599