Literature DB >> 23850765

Multi-paddock grazing on rangelands: why the perceptual dichotomy between research results and rancher experience?

Richard Teague1, Fred Provenza, Urs Kreuter, Tim Steffens, Matt Barnes.   

Abstract

Maintaining or enhancing the productive capacity and resilience of rangeland ecosystems is critical for the continued support of people who depend on them for their livelihoods, especially in the face of climatic change. This is also necessary for the continued delivery of ecosystem services derived from rangelands for the broader benefit of societies around the world. Multi-paddock grazing management has been recommended since the mid-20th century as an important tool to adaptively manage rangelands ecosystems to sustain productivity and improve animal management. Moreover, there is much anecdotal evidence from producers that, if applied appropriately, multi-paddock grazing can improve forage and livestock production. By contrast, recent reviews of published rangeland-based grazing systems studies have concluded that, in general, field trials show no superiority of vegetation or animal production in multi-paddock grazing relative to continuous yearlong stocking of single-paddock livestock production systems. Our goal is to provide a framework for rangeland management decisions that support the productivity and resiliency of rangelands and then to identify why different perceptions exist among rangeland managers who have effectively used multi-paddock grazing systems and research scientists who have studied them. First, we discuss the ecology of grazed ecosystems under free-ranging herbivores and under single-paddock fenced conditions. Second, we identify five principles underpinning the adaptive management actions used by successful grazing managers and the ecological, physiological, and behavioral framework they use to achieve desired conservation, production, and financial goals. Third, we examine adaptive management principles needed to successfully manage rangelands subjected to varying environmental conditions. Fourth, we describe the differences between the interpretation of results of grazing systems research reported in the scientific literature and the results reported by successful grazing managers; we highlight the shortcomings of most of the previously conducted grazing systems research for providing information relevant for rangeland managers who aim to achieve desired environmental and economic goals. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and present testable hypotheses to broaden our understanding of how planned multi-paddock grazing management can be used at the ranching enterprise scale to facilitate the adaptive management of rangelands under dynamic environmental conditions.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive management; Grazed ecosystems; Grazing systems; Rangeland restoration; Science and management; Socio-ecological resilience

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23850765     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  7 in total

1.  FORAGES AND PASTURES SYMPOSIUM: COVER CROPS IN LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION: WHOLE-SYSTEM APPROACH: Managing grazing to restore soil health and farm livelihoods.

Authors:  W R Teague
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Quantifying the immediate response of the soil microbial community to different grazing intensities on irrigated pastures.

Authors:  Emily Van Syoc; Shannon E Albeke; John Derek Scasta; Linda T A van Diepen
Journal:  Agric Ecosyst Environ       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.567

3.  Episodic herbivory, plant density dependence, and stimulation of aboveground plant production.

Authors:  Mark E Ritchie; Jacob F Penner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Adaptive multi-paddock grazing management's influence on soil food web community structure for: increasing pasture forage production, soil organic carbon, and reducing soil respiration rates in southeastern USA ranches.

Authors:  David C Johnson; Richard Teague; Steven Apfelbaum; Ry Thompson; Peter Byck
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.061

5.  Land-based climate solutions for the United States.

Authors:  G Philip Robertson; Stephen K Hamilton; Keith Paustian; Pete Smith
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 13.211

6.  Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia.

Authors:  Jonathan Sanderman; Jodie Reseigh; Michael Wurst; Mary-Anne Young; Jenet Austin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Voisin Rational Grazing as a Sustainable Alternative for Livestock Production.

Authors:  Luiz C Pinheiro Machado Filho; Hizumi L S Seó; Ruan R Daros; Daniel Enriquez-Hidalgo; Adenor V Wendling; Luiz C Pinheiro Machado
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.