Literature DB >> 23849691

Are Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Para-aortic Contouring Guidelines for Pancreatic Neoplasm applicable to other malignancies--assessment of nodal distribution in gynecological malignancies.

Peyman Kabolizadeh1, Suyash Fulay, Sushil Beriwal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiation therapy is used to reduce dose to adjacent critical structures while maintaining adequate target coverage, but it requires precise target localization. We report the 3-dimensional distribution of para-aortic (PA) lymph nodes (LN) in pelvic malignancies. We propose a guideline to accurately define the PA LN by anatomic landmarks and compare our data with published guidelines for pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 46 patients with pelvic malignancies and positive PA LNs. Positive LNs were defined based on size and morphology or fluorodeoxyglucose avidity. All PA LNs were characterized into 3 groups based on location: left PA (between aorta and left psoas muscle), aortocaval (between aorta and inferior vena cava), and right paracaval (between inferior vena cava and right psoas muscle). Patients with retrocrural LNs were also analyzed.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three positive PA LNs were evaluated. The majority of the PA LNs were in the left PA (59%) and aortocaval (35) regions, and only 8% were in the right paracaval region. All patients with positive right paracaval LNs also had involved left PA LNs, with only 1 exception. The highest PA LN involvement was at the level of the renal vessels and was seen in 28% of patients. Of these patients with disease extending to renal vessels, 38% had retrocrural LN involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: The nodal contouring for the PA region should not be defined by a fixed circumferential margin around the vessels. The left PA and aortocaval spaces should be covered adequately because these are common locations of PA LNs. For microscopic disease superiorly, contouring should extend up to renal vessels rather than a fixed bony landmark. For patients who have nodal involvement at renal vessels, one can consider including retrocrural LNs. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Para-aortic Contouring Guidelines for Pancreatic Neoplasm are not applicable to gynecological malignancies.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23849691     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  5 in total

1.  Proton Therapy Reduces Normal Tissue Dose in Extended-Field Pelvic Radiation for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Melody J Xu; Alisha Maity; Jennifer Vogel; Maura Kirk; Huifang Zhai; Stefan Both; Lilie L Lin
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-03-21

2.  Reduction of dose to duodenum with a refined delineation method of Para-aortic region in patients with locally advanced cervical Cancer receiving prophylactic extended-field radiotherapy.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Xiaoliang Liu; Ke Hu; Jie Qiu; Fuquan Zhang; Xiaorong Hou; Junfang Yan; Qingyu Meng; Weiping Wang; Lang Yu; Yijun Wang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Prospective observational study evaluating acute and delayed treatment related toxicities of prophylactic extended field volumetric modulated arc therapy with concurrent cisplatin in cervical cancer patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  N Ballari; B Rai; A Bahl; B R Mittal; S Ghoshal
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-03-09

4.  Mapping patterns of para-aortic lymph node recurrence in cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Bong Kyung Bae; Shin-Hyung Park; Shin Young Jeong; Gun Oh Chong; Mi Young Kim; Jae-Chul Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Clinical outcome of extended-field irradiation vs. pelvic irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yi Ouyang; Yanhong Wang; Kai Chen; Xinping Cao; Yiming Zeng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.967

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.