N Ballari1, B Rai1, A Bahl1, B R Mittal2, S Ghoshal1. 1. Departments of Radiotherapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India. 2. Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment related acute and delayed toxicities of extended field Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with concurrent chemotherapy in patients of locally advanced cervical cancer with pelvic lymph nodes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2014 to 2016, 15 patients of locally advanced cervical cancer with Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) positive pelvic lymph nodes were treated with extended field Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-VMAT 45 Gy/55 Gy/25#/5weeks and concurrent cisplatin. Acute toxicities were documented according to common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4 (CTCAE v.4). Dose volume parameters and patient characteristics were analyzed for association with toxicities. RESULTS: Median age of patients at diagnosis was 48 years. 40% (6 patients) were stage IIB & 60% (9 patients) were stage IIIB. Median number of involved pelvic lymph nodes was 2 (range, 1-4), commonest location was external iliac lymph node region (86%). Median number of concurrent chemotherapy cycles received was five. Treatment was well tolerated and there were no grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. Commonest acute toxicities observed were vomiting (≥grade2 -13.3%) followed by & nausea (grade ≥ 2 in 6%) and were associated with volume of bowel bag receiving 45 Gy. Constitutional symptoms (≥grade 2) were observed in 6% patients and had no dosimetric associations. At a median follow up of 43 months, delayed ≥ grade1, 2, 3 toxicity were observed in 80%, 0%, and 0% respectively with diarrhea being the commonest. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic para aortic extended field VMAT with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer is well tolerated with acceptable acute toxicity profile. Significant grade 3 acute/delayed toxicities were not observed in this cohort of patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment related acute and delayed toxicities of extended field Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with concurrent chemotherapy in patients of locally advanced cervical cancer with pelvic lymph nodes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2014 to 2016, 15 patients of locally advanced cervical cancer with Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) positive pelvic lymph nodes were treated with extended field Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-VMAT 45 Gy/55 Gy/25#/5weeks and concurrent cisplatin. Acute toxicities were documented according to common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4 (CTCAE v.4). Dose volume parameters and patient characteristics were analyzed for association with toxicities. RESULTS: Median age of patients at diagnosis was 48 years. 40% (6 patients) were stage IIB & 60% (9 patients) were stage IIIB. Median number of involved pelvic lymph nodes was 2 (range, 1-4), commonest location was external iliac lymph node region (86%). Median number of concurrent chemotherapy cycles received was five. Treatment was well tolerated and there were no grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. Commonest acute toxicities observed were vomiting (≥grade2 -13.3%) followed by & nausea (grade ≥ 2 in 6%) and were associated with volume of bowel bag receiving 45 Gy. Constitutional symptoms (≥grade 2) were observed in 6% patients and had no dosimetric associations. At a median follow up of 43 months, delayed ≥ grade1, 2, 3 toxicity were observed in 80%, 0%, and 0% respectively with diarrhea being the commonest. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic para aortic extended field VMAT with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer is well tolerated with acceptable acute toxicity profile. Significant grade 3 acute/delayed toxicities were not observed in this cohort of patients.
Authors: Beth M Beadle; Anuja Jhingran; Sue S Yom; Pedro T Ramirez; Patricia J Eifel Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-07-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Lindsay G Jensen; Michael D Hasselle; Brent S Rose; Sameer K Nath; Yasmin Hasan; Dan J Scanderbeg; Catheryn M Yashar; Arno J Mundt; Loren K Mell Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: M Morris; P J Eifel; J Lu; P W Grigsby; C Levenback; R E Stevens; M Rotman; D M Gershenson; D G Mutch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-04-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kari L Ring; Jennifer L Young; Neal E Dunlap; Willie A Andersen; Bernard F Schneider Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-04-26 Impact factor: 8.661