Literature DB >> 23849403

Reproductive performance of mice in disposable and standard individually ventilated cages.

Danielle R Ferguson1, Michele M Bailey.   

Abstract

This study assessed the reproductive performance of mice housed in 2 types of individually ventilated caging systems. Breeding pairs from 48 female and 24 male mice of 3 established transgenic mouse breeding colonies were placed in either a standard or disposable ventilated caging system. For 3 breeding cycles, the number of pups born, pup survival rate to weaning, time interval between litters, and pup weights were monitored for each breeding pair. Disposable and standard cages were maintained in the same location during breeding. Environmental parameters included intracage temperature, humidity, and ammonia and carbon dioxide levels and room light intensity and sound. Overall, 776 offspring were produced. Breeding performance did not differ significantly between the 2 cage types. By 11 wk of age, the weights of pups from both cage types were equivalent. The intracage temperature was 1.1 °F warmer and light intensity at the site of the nest was 34 lx dimmer in disposable cages than in standard caging. The difference in lighting likely was due to nest location; the nests in the disposable cages were at the back of the cages and away from the anterior air supply, whereas in standard caging, nests were at the front of the cages, with the air supply at the rear. Under these husbandry conditions, mice housed in disposable caging systems have comparable breeding performance to those housed in standard individually ventilated cages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23849403      PMCID: PMC3690442     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  22 in total

1.  Isolator Rodent Caging Systems (State of the Art): A Critical View.

Authors:  Neil S. Lipman
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1999-09

2.  Long-term effects of cage-cleaning frequency and bedding type on laboratory rat health, welfare, and handleability: a cross-laboratory study.

Authors:  Charlotte C Burn; Alan Peters; Michael J Day; Georgia J Mason
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.471

3.  Carbon dioxide and ammonia in mouse cages: effect of cage covers, population, and activity.

Authors:  L J Serrano
Journal:  Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1971-02

4.  A system for large-scale inbred mouse production, and a computer method to aid in subline selection.

Authors:  R F Kallman
Journal:  Lab Anim Care       Date:  1966-08

5.  Light intensity and the oestrous cycle in albino and normally pigmented mice.

Authors:  H Donnelly; P Saibaba
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Microenvironment in Ventilated Animal Cages with Differing Ventilation Rates, Mice Populations, and Frequency of Bedding Changes.

Authors:  Carolyn Reeb; Robert Jones; David Bearg; Hendrick Bedigan; David Myers; Beverly Paigen
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1998-03

7.  The effect of daily disturbance on the breeding performance of mice.

Authors:  Alan G Peters; Peter M Bywater; Michael F W Festing
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.471

8.  Effects of housing density on weight gain, immune function, behavior, and plasma corticosterone concentrations in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Kathy Laber; Lynn M Veatch; Marcelo F Lopez; Jennifer K Mulligan; Deanne M R Lathers
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 9.  The impact of light, noise, cage cleaning and in-house transport on welfare and stress of laboratory rats.

Authors:  M J Castelhano-Carlos; V Baumans
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  Comparison of environment and mice in static and mechanically ventilated isolator cages with different air velocities and ventilation designs.

Authors:  Farhad Memarzadeh; Paul C Harrison; Gerald L Riskowski; Tonja Henze
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2004-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Retrospective Analysis of Reproductive Performance of Pair-bred Compared with Trio-bred Mice.

Authors:  Katherine Wasson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Evaluation of Various IVC Systems According to Mouse Reproductive Performance and Husbandry and Environmental Parameters.

Authors:  Mitchel G Stover; Jason S Villano
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 1.706

3.  Effects of ketoprofen, morphine, and kappa opioids on pain-related depression of nesting in mice.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Bradley Neddenriep; Ahmad A Altarifi; F Ivy Carroll; Michael D Leitl; Laurence L Miller
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.926

4.  A practical blueprint to systematically study life-long health consequences of novel medically assisted reproductive treatments.

Authors:  Callista L Mulder; Joana B Serrano; Lisa A E Catsburg; Tessa J Roseboom; Sjoerd Repping; Ans M M van Pelt
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.918

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.