Literature DB >> 23849285

Worker health is good for the economy: union density and psychosocial safety climate as determinants of country differences in worker health and productivity in 31 European countries.

Maureen F Dollard1, Daniel Y Neser.   

Abstract

Work stress is recognized globally as a social determinant of worker health. Therefore we explored whether work stress related factors explained national differences in health and productivity (gross domestic product (GDP)). We proposed a national worker health productivity model whereby macro market power factors (i.e. union density), influence national worker health and GDP via work psychosocial factors and income inequality. We combined five different data sets canvasing 31 wealthy European countries. Aggregated worker self-reported health accounted for 13 per cent of the variance in national life expectancy and in national gross domestic product (GDP). The most important factors explaining worker self-reported health and GDP between nations were two levels of labor protection, macro-level (union density), and organizational-level (psychosocial safety climate, PSC, i.e. the extent of management concern for worker psychological health). The majority of countries with the highest levels of union density and PSC (i.e., workplace protections) were Social Democratic in nature (i.e., Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway). Results support a type of society explanation that social and economic factors (e.g., welfare regimes, work related policies) in concert with political power agents at a national level explain in part national differences in workplace protection (PSC) that are important for worker health and productivity. Attention should be given across all countries, to national policies to improve worker health, by bolstering national and local democratic processes and representation to address and implement policies for psychosocial risk factors for work stress, bullying and violence. Results suggest worker health is good for the economy, and should be considered in national health and productivity accounting. Eroding unionism may not be good for worker health or the economy either.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-national differences in worker self-reported health; Europe; Gross domestic product; Psychosocial safety climate; Union density; Work stress

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23849285     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  11 in total

1.  The association between union membership and perceptions of safety climate among US adult workers.

Authors:  Aurora B Le; Su-Wei Wong; Hsien-Chang Lin; Todd D Smith
Journal:  Saf Sci       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.877

2.  Workplace risk factors for anxiety and depression in male-dominated industries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samantha Battams; Ann M Roche; Jane A Fischer; Nicole K Lee; Jacqui Cameron; Victoria Kostadinov
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2014-10-06

3.  At-risk and intervention thresholds of occupational stress using a visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Frédéric Dutheil; Bruno Pereira; Farès Moustafa; Geraldine Naughton; François-Xavier Lesage; Céline Lambert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The role of autonomy and social support in the relation between psychosocial safety climate and stress in health care workers.

Authors:  Bo M Havermans; Cécile R L Boot; Irene L D Houtman; Evelien P M Brouwers; Johannes R Anema; Allard J van der Beek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  How to Promote Workplace Health in order to Work into Old Age: Experiences from Employees in an Industrial Setting.

Authors:  Marie Lydell; Cathrine Hildingh; Arne Söderbom; Kristina Ziegert
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2019-04-01

6.  Socio-Economic Impact of and Adaptation to Extreme Heat and Cold of Farmers in the Food Bowl of Nepal.

Authors:  Nanda Kaji Budhathoki; Kerstin K Zander
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Assessment of current occupational safety and health regulations and legislation in the Caribbean.

Authors:  Muge Akpinar-Elci; MyNgoc Nguyen; Marvin Randall; Satesh Bidaisee; Omur Elci; Olaniyi Olayinka; Julieta Rodriguez Guzman
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2017-06-08

8.  The Effect of Organizational Changes on the Psychosocial Work Environment: Changes in Psychological and Social Working Conditions Following Organizational Changes.

Authors:  Lise Fløvik; Stein Knardahl; Jan Olav Christensen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-20

9.  Aggregate Exposure and Cumulative Risk Assessment--Integrating Occupational and Non-occupational Risk Factors.

Authors:  T J Lentz; G S Dotson; P R D Williams; A Maier; B Gadagbui; S P Pandalai; A Lamba; F Hearl; M Mumtaz
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Comparison of anxiety and depression status between office and manufacturing job employees in a large manufacturing company: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  WonYang Kang; Won-Ju Park; Keun-Ho Jang; Hyeong-Min Lim; Ji-Sung Ann; Seung-Hyeon Cho; Jai-Dong Moon
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.