Literature DB >> 23846781

Imaging response and residual metastatic axillary lymph node disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

Tina J Hieken1, Judy C Boughey, Katie N Jones, Sejal S Shah, Katrina N Glazebrook.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although surgical management of the breast after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) may be governed by treatment response, axillary management continues to be determined by stage at presentation. Axillary ultrasound (AUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is used to detect lymph node (LN) metastases for pre-NAC staging, but imaging assessment of treatment response in the axilla remains undefined. We evaluated post-NAC axillary imaging and surgical pathology to understand how imaging might direct axillary surgery.
METHODS: We evaluated pre- and post-NAC axillary imaging and clinicopathologic data in 272 patients who received NAC for primary breast cancer and underwent operation at our institution from 2010 to 2012. Treatment response on imaging was categorized as complete (CR), partial (PR), and none/progression (NR).
RESULTS: Pre-NAC axillary staging classified patients as AUS negative/no FNA (n = 61), FNA/LN negative (n = 42), and FNA/LN positive (n = 169). Post-NAC axillary imaging included AUS (n = 146), MRI (n = 139), and PET-CT (n = 38). At operation, 128 of 272 patients (47 %) were LN positive: 23.3 % (24 of 103) of cN0 and 61.5 % (104 of 169) of cN1-AUS/FNA-positive patients at presentation. Of the 65 cN1-ypN0 patients, 58.1 % (25 of 43) had an imaging CR by US, 58.6 % (17 of 29) by MRI, and 84.6 % (11 of 13) by PET-CT. The sensitivity of post-NAC axillary imaging in detecting persistent LN metastases for cN1-AUS/FNA-positive patients was 69.8 % for US, 61.0 % for MRI, and 63.2 % for PET-CT.
CONCLUSIONS: Performance characteristics of AUS, MRI, and PET-CT, while informative, were inadequate to preclude surgical axillary staging of in breast cancer patients after NAC. Whether this information might be used to tailor surgical and postsurgical treatment requires further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23846781     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3118-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  32 in total

Review 1.  Postmastectomy radiation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: review and interpretation of available data.

Authors:  Amar U Kishan; Susan A McCloskey
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  Axillary Management of Stage II/III Breast Cancer in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: Results of CALGB 40601 (HER2-Positive) and CALGB 40603 (Triple-Negative).

Authors:  David W Ollila; Constance T Cirrincione; Donald A Berry; Lisa A Carey; William M Sikov; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  ASO Author Reflections: A Negative Axillary Clinical Exam Adequately Identifies Clinically Node-Positive Patients who Downstage After NAC and are Candidates for SLNB.

Authors:  Tracy-Ann Moo; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  New horizons in imaging and surgical assessment of breast cancer lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Firouzeh Arjmandi; Ann Mootz; Deborah Farr; Sangeetha Reddy; Basak Dogan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Performance of Mid-Treatment Breast Ultrasound and Axillary Ultrasound in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Breast Cancer Subtype.

Authors:  Rosalind P Candelaria; Roland L Bassett; William Fraser Symmans; Maheshwari Ramineni; Stacy L Moulder; Henry M Kuerer; Alastair M Thompson; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-03-17

6.  Feasibility of Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Marking with a Clip in Breast Cancer Patients Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Woo Seok Byon; Kwan Ho Lee; Ji-Sup Yun; Yong Lai Park; Chan Heun Park; In Young Youn; Seon Hyeong Choi; Yoon Jung Choi; Shin Ho Kook; Sung-Im Do
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  MRI and Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response in the Breast and Axilla after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph J Weber; Maxine S Jochelson; Anne Eaton; Emily C Zabor; Andrea V Barrio; Mary L Gemignani; Melissa Pilewskie; Kimberly J Van Zee; Monica Morrow; Mahmoud El-Tamer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Prediction of axillary response by monitoring with ultrasound and MRI during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Na Lae Eun; Eun Ju Son; Hye Mi Gweon; Jeong-Ah Kim; Ji Hyun Youk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery: Can We Reduce Rates of Mastectomy and Chemotherapy Use in Patients with Traditional Indications for Mastectomy?

Authors:  Angelena Crown; Nicketti Handy; Christina Weed; Ruby Laskin; Flavio G Rocha; Janie Grumley
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Axillary Ultrasound Identifies Residual Nodal Disease After Chemotherapy: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1071 Trial (Alliance).

Authors:  Huong T Le-Petross; Linda M McCall; Kelly K Hunt; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Karla V Ballman; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.