Literature DB >> 23845225

Hormone-receptor expression and ovarian cancer survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study.

Weiva Sieh1, Martin Köbel, Teri A Longacre, David D Bowtell, Anna deFazio, Marc T Goodman, Estrid Høgdall, Suha Deen, Nicolas Wentzensen, Kirsten B Moysich, James D Brenton, Blaise A Clarke, Usha Menon, C Blake Gilks, Andre Kim, Jason Madore, Sian Fereday, Joshy George, Laura Galletta, Galina Lurie, Lynne R Wilkens, Michael E Carney, Pamela J Thompson, Rayna K Matsuno, Susanne Krüger Kjær, Allan Jensen, Claus Høgdall, Kimberly R Kalli, Brooke L Fridley, Gary L Keeney, Robert A Vierkant, Julie M Cunningham, Louise A Brinton, Hannah P Yang, Mark E Sherman, Montserrat García-Closas, Jolanta Lissowska, Kunle Odunsi, Carl Morrison, Shashikant Lele, Wiam Bshara, Lara Sucheston, Mercedes Jimenez-Linan, Kristy Driver, Jennifer Alsop, Marie Mack, Valerie McGuire, Joseph H Rothstein, Barry P Rosen, Marcus Q Bernardini, Helen Mackay, Amit Oza, Eva L Wozniak, Elizabeth Benjamin, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Simon A Gayther, Anna V Tinker, Leah M Prentice, Christine Chow, Michael S Anglesio, Sharon E Johnatty, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Alice S Whittemore, Paul D P Pharoah, Ellen L Goode, David G Huntsman, Susan J Ramus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few biomarkers of ovarian cancer prognosis have been established, partly because subtype-specific associations might be obscured in studies combining all histopathological subtypes. We examined whether tumour expression of the progesterone receptor (PR) and oestrogen receptor (ER) was associated with subtype-specific survival.
METHODS: 12 studies participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium contributed tissue microarray sections and clinical data to our study. Participants included in our analysis had been diagnosed with invasive serous, mucinous, endometrioid, or clear-cell carcinomas of the ovary. For a patient to be eligible, tissue microarrays, clinical follow-up data, age at diagnosis, and tumour grade and stage had to be available. Clinical data were obtained from medical records, cancer registries, death certificates, pathology reports, and review of histological slides. PR and ER statuses were assessed by central immunohistochemistry analysis done by masked pathologists. PR and ER staining was defined as negative (<1% tumour cell nuclei), weak (1 to <50%), or strong (≥50%). Associations with disease-specific survival were assessed.
FINDINGS: 2933 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer were included: 1742 with high-grade serous carcinoma, 110 with low-grade serous carcinoma, 207 with mucinous carcinoma, 484 with endometrioid carcinoma, and 390 with clear-cell carcinoma. PR expression was associated with improved disease-specific survival in endometrioid carcinoma (log-rank p<0·0001) and high-grade serous carcinoma (log-rank p=0·0006), and ER expression was associated with improved disease-specific survival in endometrioid carcinoma (log-rank p<0·0001). We recorded no significant associations for mucinous, clear-cell, or low-grade serous carcinoma. Positive hormone-receptor expression (weak or strong staining for PR or ER, or both) was associated with significantly improved disease-specific survival in endometrioid carcinoma compared with negative hormone-receptor expression, independent of study site, age, stage, and grade (hazard ratio 0·33, 95% CI 0·21-0·51; p<0·0001). Strong PR expression was independently associated with improved disease-specific survival in high-grade serous carcinoma (0·71, 0·55-0·91; p=0·0080), but weak PR expression was not (1·02, 0·89-1·18; p=0·74).
INTERPRETATION: PR and ER are prognostic biomarkers for endometrioid and high-grade serous ovarian cancers. Clinical trials, stratified by subtype and biomarker status, are needed to establish whether hormone-receptor status predicts response to endocrine treatment, and whether it could guide personalised treatment for ovarian cancer. FUNDING: Carraresi Foundation and others.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23845225      PMCID: PMC4006367          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70253-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  48 in total

1.  Relation of contraceptive and reproductive history to ovarian cancer risk in carriers and noncarriers of BRCA1 gene mutations.

Authors:  V McGuire; A Felberg; M Mills; K L Ostrow; R DiCioccio; E M John; D W West; A S Whittemore
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Association between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and survival in women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kelly L Bolton; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Cindy Goh; Siegal Sadetzki; Susan J Ramus; Beth Y Karlan; Diether Lambrechts; Evelyn Despierre; Daniel Barrowdale; Lesley McGuffog; Sue Healey; Douglas F Easton; Olga Sinilnikova; Javier Benítez; María J García; Susan Neuhausen; Mitchell H Gail; Patricia Hartge; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind Eeles; Andrew K Godwin; Mary B Daly; Ava Kwong; Edmond S K Ma; Conxi Lázaro; Ignacio Blanco; Marco Montagna; Emma D'Andrea; Maria Ornella Nicoletto; Sharon E Johnatty; Susanne Krüger Kjær; Allan Jensen; Estrid Høgdall; Ellen L Goode; Brooke L Fridley; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene; Phuong L Mai; Angela Chetrit; Flora Lubin; Galit Hirsh-Yechezkel; Gord Glendon; Irene L Andrulis; Amanda E Toland; Leigha Senter; Martin E Gore; Charlie Gourley; Caroline O Michie; Honglin Song; Jonathan Tyrer; Alice S Whittemore; Valerie McGuire; Weiva Sieh; Ulf Kristoffersson; Håkan Olsson; Åke Borg; Douglas A Levine; Linda Steele; Mary S Beattie; Salina Chan; Robert L Nussbaum; Kirsten B Moysich; Jenny Gross; Ilana Cass; Christine Walsh; Andrew J Li; Ronald Leuchter; Ora Gordon; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Simon A Gayther; Stephen J Chanock; Antonis C Antoniou; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Musgrove; Robert L Sutherland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  The biological and clinical value of p53 expression in pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Alexander Reuss; Andreas du Bois; Stefan Kommoss; Friedrich Kommoss; Dongxia Gao; Steve E Kalloger; David G Huntsman; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  A review of an unfavorable subset of breast cancer: estrogen receptor positive progesterone receptor negative.

Authors:  Jigisha P Thakkar; Divyesh G Mehta
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-02-21

7.  Evaluation of a hormone receptor-positive ovarian carcinoma subtype with a favourable prognosis by determination of progesterone receptor and oestrogen receptor 1 mRNA expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.

Authors:  Bruno V Sinn; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Ralph M Wirtz; Jan Budczies; Jalid Sehouli; Radoslav Chekerov; Manfred Dietel; Carsten Denkert
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system.

Authors:  Anais Malpica; Michael T Deavers; Karen Lu; Diane C Bodurka; Edward N Atkinson; David M Gershenson; Elvio G Silva
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Association of two common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the CYP19A1 locus and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Marc T Goodman; Galina Lurie; Pamela J Thompson; Katharine E McDuffie; Michael E Carney
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.678

10.  Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  C Blake Gilks; Diana N Ionescu; Steve E Kalloger; Martin Köbel; Julie Irving; Blaise Clarke; Jennifer Santos; Nhu Le; Veronika Moravan; Kenneth Swenerton
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 3.466

View more
  149 in total

1.  Targeting progesterone signaling prevents metastatic ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Olga Kim; Eun Young Park; Sun Young Kwon; Sojin Shin; Robert E Emerson; Yong-Hyun Shin; Francesco J DeMayo; John P Lydon; Donna M Coffey; Shannon M Hawkins; Lawrence A Quilliam; Dong-Joo Cheon; Facundo M Fernández; Kenneth P Nephew; Adam R Karpf; Martin Widschwendter; Anil K Sood; Robert C Bast; Andrew K Godwin; Kathy D Miller; Chi-Heum Cho; Jaeyeon Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening Trial Pathology Tissue Resource.

Authors:  Claire S Zhu; Wen-Yi Huang; Paul F Pinsky; Christine D Berg; Mark Sherman; Kelly J Yu; Danielle M Carrick; Amanda Black; Robert Hoover; Petra Lenz; Craig Williams; Laura Hawkins; Matthew Chaloux; Susan Yurgalevitch; Sunitha Mathew; Amy Miller; Vanessa Olivo; Asia Khan; Shannon M Pretzel; Deborah Multerer; Patricia Beckmann; Karen G Broski; Neal D Freedman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Circulating Estrogens and Postmenopausal Ovarian Cancer Risk in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Louise A Brinton; Garnet L Anderson; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Roni T Falk; Howard D Strickler; Sarunas Sliesoraitis; Lewis H Kuller; Margery L Gass; Barbara J Fuhrman; Xia Xu; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Progesterone action in breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Caroline H Diep; Andrea R Daniel; Laura J Mauro; Todd P Knutson; Carol A Lange
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.098

Review 5.  Fallopian tube initiation of high grade serous ovarian cancer and ovarian metastasis: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Tova M Bergsten; Joanna E Burdette; Matthew Dean
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Tumor Cell-Independent Estrogen Signaling Drives Disease Progression through Mobilization of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells.

Authors:  Nikolaos Svoronos; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt; Michael J Allegrezza; Melanie R Rutkowski; Kyle K Payne; Amelia J Tesone; Jenny M Nguyen; Tyler J Curiel; Mark G Cadungog; Sunil Singhal; Evgeniy B Eruslanov; Paul Zhang; Julia Tchou; Rugang Zhang; Jose R Conejo-Garcia
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 7.  Hormonal treatment in recurrent and metastatic gynaecological cancers: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Dirkje W Sommeijer; Katrin M Sjoquist; Michael Friedlander
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Ovarian Carcinoma Histotype: Strengths and Limitations of Integrating Morphology With Immunohistochemical Predictions.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Li Luo; Xin Grevers; Sandra Lee; Angela Brooks-Wilson; C Blake Gilks; Nhu D Le; Linda S Cook
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.762

9.  Cytokeratin 5-Positive Cells Represent a Therapy Resistant subpopulation in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Bradley R Corr; Jessica Finlay-Schultz; Rachel B Rosen; Lubna Qamar; Miriam D Post; Kian Behbakht; Monique A Spillman; Carol A Sartorius
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Active FOXO1 Is a Key Determinant of Isoform-Specific Progesterone Receptor Transactivation and Senescence Programming.

Authors:  Caroline H Diep; Todd P Knutson; Carol A Lange
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.