AIMS: In vitro and epidemiological studies indicate an essential role for progesterone in the aetiology and progression of ovarian carcinoma. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic role of progesterone receptor (PR) protein and mRNA expression. METHODS AND RESULTS: PR expression was examined by immunohistochemistry (n=143) and kinetic reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue (n=55). PR mRNA and protein expression correlated (P<0.0001). PR mRNA was a positive predictor for overall and progression-free survival (P=0.0005 and P<0.0001, respectively). Protein expression was also prognostic (P=0.015 and P=0.0011, respectively), whereas only PR mRNA retained its prognostic value on multivariate analysis (P=0.04). PR mRNA was still a positive prognostic marker among oestrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mRNA-positive tumours (P=0.0007) and survival was best in patients with PR- and ESR1-positive phenotypes (P=0.0155 and P=0.0016, respectively). CONCLUSION: Expression of PR and ESR1 defines a subgroup of ovarian carcinomas with a favourable prognosis. PR and ESR1 mRNA expression analysis is a sensitive, quantitative and easy-to-perform high-throughput analytical tool for the identification of this subgroup and could be predictive in clinical trials focused on patients with potential benefit from hormonal treatment.
AIMS: In vitro and epidemiological studies indicate an essential role for progesterone in the aetiology and progression of ovarian carcinoma. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic role of progesterone receptor (PR) protein and mRNA expression. METHODS AND RESULTS:PR expression was examined by immunohistochemistry (n=143) and kinetic reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue (n=55). PR mRNA and protein expression correlated (P<0.0001). PR mRNA was a positive predictor for overall and progression-free survival (P=0.0005 and P<0.0001, respectively). Protein expression was also prognostic (P=0.015 and P=0.0011, respectively), whereas only PR mRNA retained its prognostic value on multivariate analysis (P=0.04). PR mRNA was still a positive prognostic marker among oestrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mRNA-positive tumours (P=0.0007) and survival was best in patients with PR- and ESR1-positive phenotypes (P=0.0155 and P=0.0016, respectively). CONCLUSION: Expression of PR and ESR1 defines a subgroup of ovarian carcinomas with a favourable prognosis. PR and ESR1 mRNA expression analysis is a sensitive, quantitative and easy-to-perform high-throughput analytical tool for the identification of this subgroup and could be predictive in clinical trials focused on patients with potential benefit from hormonal treatment.
Authors: Caroline H Diep; Andrea R Daniel; Laura J Mauro; Todd P Knutson; Carol A Lange Journal: J Mol Endocrinol Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 5.098
Authors: S Darb-Esfahani; F Fritzsche; G Kristiansen; W Weichert; J Sehouli; I Braicu; M Dietel; C Denkert Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Caroline H Diep; Nathan J Charles; C Blake Gilks; Steve E Kalloger; Peter A Argenta; Carol A Lange Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Weiva Sieh; Martin Köbel; Teri A Longacre; David D Bowtell; Anna deFazio; Marc T Goodman; Estrid Høgdall; Suha Deen; Nicolas Wentzensen; Kirsten B Moysich; James D Brenton; Blaise A Clarke; Usha Menon; C Blake Gilks; Andre Kim; Jason Madore; Sian Fereday; Joshy George; Laura Galletta; Galina Lurie; Lynne R Wilkens; Michael E Carney; Pamela J Thompson; Rayna K Matsuno; Susanne Krüger Kjær; Allan Jensen; Claus Høgdall; Kimberly R Kalli; Brooke L Fridley; Gary L Keeney; Robert A Vierkant; Julie M Cunningham; Louise A Brinton; Hannah P Yang; Mark E Sherman; Montserrat García-Closas; Jolanta Lissowska; Kunle Odunsi; Carl Morrison; Shashikant Lele; Wiam Bshara; Lara Sucheston; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Kristy Driver; Jennifer Alsop; Marie Mack; Valerie McGuire; Joseph H Rothstein; Barry P Rosen; Marcus Q Bernardini; Helen Mackay; Amit Oza; Eva L Wozniak; Elizabeth Benjamin; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Simon A Gayther; Anna V Tinker; Leah M Prentice; Christine Chow; Michael S Anglesio; Sharon E Johnatty; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Alice S Whittemore; Paul D P Pharoah; Ellen L Goode; David G Huntsman; Susan J Ramus Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jan Budczies; Frederick Klauschen; Bruno V Sinn; Balázs Győrffy; Wolfgang D Schmitt; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Carsten Denkert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240