Literature DB >> 2384508

Lumbar discography in normal subjects. A controlled, prospective study.

T R Walsh1, J N Weinstein, K F Spratt, T R Lehmann, C Aprill, H Sayre.   

Abstract

Major advances in the techniques of discography since 1968, in conjunction with major strides in the evaluation of pain in recent years, prompted a study in which Holt's work on the specificity of discography was replicated and extended. For the present study, seven patients who had low-back pain and ten volunteers who had been carefully screened, with a questionnaire and a physical examination, to ensure that they had no history of problems with the back, had an injection at three levels, and all sessions were videotaped. After each injection, the participant was interviewed about the pattern and intensity of the pain, and then the discs were imaged with computed tomography. Five raters, who were blind to the condition of the participant, graded each disc as normal or abnormal on the basis of findings on magnetic resonance images that had been made before the injection and computed tomography (discography) were done. There was only one disagreement between the ratings that were made on the basis of the magnetic resonance images and those that were made on the basis of the discograms. Each participant's pain-related response was evaluated independently by two raters who viewed the videotapes of the discography. Inter-rater reliability was 0.99, 0.93, and 0.88 for the evaluation of intensity of the pain, pain-related behavior, and similarity of the pain to pain that the subject had had before the injection. In the asymptomatic individuals, the discogram was interpreted as abnormal for 17 per cent (five) of the thirty discs and for five of the ten subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2384508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  28 in total

1.  Diskography: science and the ad hoc hypothesis.

Authors:  M T Modic
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Discography.

Authors:  S R Anderson; B Flanagan
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

Review 3.  Diagnostic discography: what is the clinical utility?

Authors:  David A Provenzano
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

4.  Peripheral disc margin shape and internal disc derangement: imaging correlation in significantly painful discs identified at provocation lumbar discography.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; W E Rothfus
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Provocation lumbar diskography at previously fused levels.

Authors:  H S Dulai; W S Bartynski; W S Rothfus; P C Gerszten
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Postdiskogram CT features of lidocaine-sensitive and lidocaine-insensitive severely painful disks at provocation lumbar diskography.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; W E Rothfus; M Kurs-Lasky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Systematic review of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain.

Authors:  M J Hancock; C G Maher; J Latimer; M F Spindler; J H McAuley; M Laslett; N Bogduk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Clinical efficacy of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of low-back pain disorders.

Authors:  N Boos; P H Lander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Disc degeneration of pediatric patients in lumbar MRI.

Authors:  S Salo; H Paajanen; A Alanen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

Review 10.  Clinical diagnosis for discogenic low back pain.

Authors:  Yin-gang Zhang; Tuan-mao Guo; Xiong Guo; Shi-xun Wu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 6.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.