Yuting Zhang1, Seo Hyon Baik, Judith R Lave. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, 130 De Soto St, Crabtree Hall A664, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. ytzhang@pitt.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of the Medicare Part D coverage gap on pharmacy use among a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries and on medication adherence among 2 subsamples with heart failure and/or diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: Pre-post design, with comparison group and propensity score weighting. METHODS: We used a 5% random sample of elderly Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in stand-alone Part D plans in 2007. The comparison group had full coverage in the gap, whereas the 2 study groups had either no coverage or generic-only coverage in the gap. Main outcomes included probability of filling a prescription, monthly pharmacy spending and number of prescriptions filled, and adherence measured by medication possession ratios. RESULTS: Relative to the comparison group, beneficiaries without drug coverage in the gap reduced the number of prescriptions filled per month by 16.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.5%-16.5%); those with generic drug coverage in the gap reduced it by 10.8% (95% CI, 10.3%-11.4%). Most of the reduction was attributable to reduced use of brand-name drugs. Beneficiaries with heart failure reduced adherence to heart failure drugs by 3.6% (95% CI, 2.9%-4.2%) and beneficiaries with diabetes reduced antidiabetic medication adherence by 10.3% (95% CI, 9.4%-11.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries reduced medication use (mainly brand-name drugs) after entering the coverage gap. This result suggests that while beneficiaries' financial burden would continue because of the coverage gap, the gap would not result in a large reduction in medication adherence for essential drugs for diabetes and heart failure.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of the Medicare Part D coverage gap on pharmacy use among a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries and on medication adherence among 2 subsamples with heart failure and/or diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: Pre-post design, with comparison group and propensity score weighting. METHODS: We used a 5% random sample of elderly Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in stand-alone Part D plans in 2007. The comparison group had full coverage in the gap, whereas the 2 study groups had either no coverage or generic-only coverage in the gap. Main outcomes included probability of filling a prescription, monthly pharmacy spending and number of prescriptions filled, and adherence measured by medication possession ratios. RESULTS: Relative to the comparison group, beneficiaries without drug coverage in the gap reduced the number of prescriptions filled per month by 16.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.5%-16.5%); those with generic drug coverage in the gap reduced it by 10.8% (95% CI, 10.3%-11.4%). Most of the reduction was attributable to reduced use of brand-name drugs. Beneficiaries with heart failure reduced adherence to heart failure drugs by 3.6% (95% CI, 2.9%-4.2%) and beneficiaries with diabetes reduced antidiabetic medication adherence by 10.3% (95% CI, 9.4%-11.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries reduced medication use (mainly brand-name drugs) after entering the coverage gap. This result suggests that while beneficiaries' financial burden would continue because of the coverage gap, the gap would not result in a large reduction in medication adherence for essential drugs for diabetes and heart failure.
Authors: Pengxiang Li; Sean McElligott; Henry Bergquist; J Sanford Schwartz; Jalpa A Doshi Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-06-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sharon Ann Hunt; William T Abraham; Marshall H Chin; Arthur M Feldman; Gary S Francis; Theodore G Ganiats; Mariell Jessup; Marvin A Konstam; Donna M Mancini; Keith Michl; John A Oates; Peter S Rahko; Marc A Silver; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-03-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John Hsu; Mary Price; Jie Huang; Richard Brand; Vicki Fung; Rita Hui; Bruce Fireman; Joseph P Newhouse; Joseph V Selby Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Susan L Ettner; Vicki Fung; Jie Huang; Norman Turk; Elaine S Quiter; Bix E Swain; John T Hsu; Carol M Mangione Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Sebastian Schneeweiss; Amanda R Patrick; Alex Pedan; Laleh Varasteh; Raisa Levin; Nan Liu; William H Shrank Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Dawn L Hershman; Jennifer Tsui; Jay Meyer; Sherry Glied; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Jason D Wright; Alfred I Neugut Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-10-27 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Dawn L Hershman; Jennifer Tsui; Jason D Wright; Ellie J Coromilas; Wei Yann Tsai; Alfred I Neugut Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 44.544