OBJECTIVE: To examine drug costs and entry and exit rates into the Part D coverage gap for beneficiaries with diabetes in Medicare Advantage managed care plans. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. METHODS: Study patients were Medicare Advantage Part D beneficiaries with diabetes from 2 large California health plans who were continuously enrolled in 2006 and had a drug coverage gap starting at $2250. Entry and exit into the gap, total drug costs, and out-of-pocket drug costs were determined using pharmacy databases. RESULTS: In 2006, 26% of the 42,801 beneficiaries with diabetes reached the coverage gap; 2% of beneficiaries exited the gap and qualified for catastrophic coverage. Beneficiaries incurred a mean of $2182 in total drug costs during 2006. Drug expenditures remained stable over the year for beneficiaries who did not enter the gap. For beneficiaries who entered the gap, total drug costs were higher overall and decreased at year's end as out-of-pocket expenses increased. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer diabetes patients in this study entered the coverage gap than had been previously estimated, but the entry rate was much higher than that of the general Medicare Advantage Part D population. Patients entering the gap had lower subsequent monthly drug expenditures; this may be due to lower-than-expected drug prices and greater use of generics in managed care, or it may potentially signal poorer drug adherence. Future work should examine these hypotheses and explore risk factors for entering the Part D coverage gap.
OBJECTIVE: To examine drug costs and entry and exit rates into the Part D coverage gap for beneficiaries with diabetes in Medicare Advantage managed care plans. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. METHODS: Study patients were Medicare Advantage Part D beneficiaries with diabetes from 2 large California health plans who were continuously enrolled in 2006 and had a drug coverage gap starting at $2250. Entry and exit into the gap, total drug costs, and out-of-pocket drug costs were determined using pharmacy databases. RESULTS: In 2006, 26% of the 42,801 beneficiaries with diabetes reached the coverage gap; 2% of beneficiaries exited the gap and qualified for catastrophic coverage. Beneficiaries incurred a mean of $2182 in total drug costs during 2006. Drug expenditures remained stable over the year for beneficiaries who did not enter the gap. For beneficiaries who entered the gap, total drug costs were higher overall and decreased at year's end as out-of-pocket expenses increased. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer diabetespatients in this study entered the coverage gap than had been previously estimated, but the entry rate was much higher than that of the general Medicare Advantage Part D population. Patients entering the gap had lower subsequent monthly drug expenditures; this may be due to lower-than-expected drug prices and greater use of generics in managed care, or it may potentially signal poorer drug adherence. Future work should examine these hypotheses and explore risk factors for entering the Part D coverage gap.
Authors: Thomas A Pearson; Steven N Blair; Stephen R Daniels; Robert H Eckel; Joan M Fair; Stephen P Fortmann; Barry A Franklin; Larry B Goldstein; Philip Greenland; Scott M Grundy; Yuling Hong; Nancy Houston Miller; Ronald M Lauer; Ira S Ockene; Ralph L Sacco; James F Sallis; Sidney C Smith; Neil J Stone; Kathryn A Taubert Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-07-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Dana Gelb Safran; Patricia Neuman; Cathy Schoen; Michelle S Kitchman; Ira B Wilson; Barbara Cooper; Angela Li; Hong Chang; William H Rogers Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2005 Jan-Jun Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Bruce Stuart; Becky A Briesacher; Dennis G Shea; Barbara Cooper; Fatima S Baysac; M Rhona Limcangco Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jeanne M Madden; Amy J Graves; Fang Zhang; Alyce S Adams; Becky A Briesacher; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Jerry H Gurwitz; Marsha Pierre-Jacques; Dana Gelb Safran; Gerald S Adler; Stephen B Soumerai Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Benjamin L Howell; Christopher A Powers; Eric D Weinhandl; Wendy L St Peter; Diane L Frankenfield Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Steven A Blackwell; David K Baugh; Melissa A Montgomery; Gary M Ciborowski; Charles J Waldron; Gerald F Riley Journal: Medicare Medicaid Res Rev Date: 2011-12-14
Authors: Jennifer M Polinski; Elaine Kilabuk; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Troyen Brennan; William H Shrank Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jennifer M Polinski; M Alan Brookhart; Robert J Glynn; Sebastian Schneeweiss Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: O Kenrik Duru; Carol M Mangione; John Hsu; W Neil Steers; Elaine Quiter; Norman Turk; Susan L Ettner; Julie A Schmittdiel; Chien-Wen Tseng Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Neil Steers; O Kenrik Duru; Susan L Ettner; Arleen F Brown; Vicki Fung; John Hsu; Elaine Quiter; Chien-Wen Tseng; Carol M Mangione Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-06-14 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Seo Hyon Baik; Bruce L Rollman; Charles F Reynolds; Judith R Lave; Kenneth J Smith; Yuting Zhang Journal: J Ment Health Policy Econ Date: 2012-09
Authors: Naomi C Sacks; James F Burgess; Howard J Cabral; Steven D Pizer; Marie E McDonnell Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 5.128