Literature DB >> 23844709

Cervical cancer screening overuse and underuse: patient and physician factors.

Cristina M Almeida1, Michael A Rodriguez, Samuel Skootsky, Janet Pregler, Neil Steers, Neil S Wenger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite recommendations for triennial cervical cancer screening for low-risk women 30 years and older, annual screening remains common. We studied how often women receiving care from an academically affiliated medical group were screened, and patient and provider factors associated with overuse and underuse. We also explored the impact of changing measurement intervals on computed screening frequency.
DESIGN: The study included women 30 years and older continuously enrolled over a 3-year period and excluded women with history of abnormal screening and conditions of high risk for cervical cancer.
METHODS: Administrative and laboratory data were merged to link Papanicolaou (pap) test results with patient and ordering provider characteristics. We used logistic regression to analyze multivariate models for overuse and underuse, and modified measurement intervals to test sensitivity to early and late pap smears.
RESULTS: The 8018 women had a mean age of 48years and 95% had an ambulatory physician visit during the observation period. Thirty-four percent of women received guideline-based screening, 45% had overuse, and 21% had underuse. Factors independently associated with overuse included younger age, more medical visits, contraceptive management visits, and gynecology provider specialty. Underuse was associated with older age, fewer medical visits, and increased comorbidity.Overuse was 47% if unsatisfactory paps were not considered and was reduced to 35% if the observation interval was reduced from 36 to 30 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Overuse and underuse of cervical cancer screening are common and clinician and patient factors are identifiable to target quality improvement interventions. Modifying the measurement interval may improve the measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23844709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  9 in total

1.  Opting out of cervical cancer screening: physicians who do not perform pap tests.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention in 78 Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics-United States, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Emily McGinnis; Beth E Meyerson; Elissa Meites; Mona Saraiya; Rebecca Griesse; Emily Snoek; Laura Haderxhanaj; Lauri E Markowitz; William Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  The education gradient in cancer screening participation: a consistent phenomenon across Europe?

Authors:  Barbara Willems; Piet Bracke
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Hongyuan Gao; Susan Brandzel; Susan Carol Bradford; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Effect of an Electronic Health Record Decision Support Alert to Decrease Excess Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Rachel I Vogel; Adam Langer; Jinai Bharucha; Melissa A Geller; Eileen Harwood; Shalini Kulasingam; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.842

6.  Overtreatment in the United States.

Authors:  Heather Lyu; Tim Xu; Daniel Brotman; Brandan Mayer-Blackwell; Michol Cooper; Michael Daniel; Elizabeth C Wick; Vikas Saini; Shannon Brownlee; Martin A Makary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Overuse of Cervical Cancer Screening Tests Among Women With Average Risk in the United States From 2013 to 2014.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Ling Chen; Ana I Tergas; Alexander Melamed; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Fady Khoury-Collado; Allison Gockley; Melissa Accordino; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-04-01

8.  Granular Quality Reporting for Cervical Cytology Testing.

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Christopher G Chute; Robert A Greenes; Hongfang Liu; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2015-03-25

9.  Shared Decision-Making and Women's Adherence to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screenings.

Authors:  Jayoung Han; Paiboon Jungsuwadee; Olufunmilola Abraham; Dongwoo Ko
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.