| Literature DB >> 23843733 |
Yu-Ling Chen1, Chien-Hung Chen, Rey-Heng Hu, Ming-Chih Ho, Yung-Ming Jeng.
Abstract
Serum levels of the tumor marker CA19-9 have been reported to be elevated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its clinicopathologic significance is still unknown. A cohort of 304 patients undergoing surgical resection for HCC and having preoperative CA19-9 data was enrolled in this study. Serum CA19-9 levels were correlated with clinicopathologic factors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictors of patient survival. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut off value of CA19-9 was determined to be 27 U/mL. One hundred and six patients had preoperative CA19-9 values >27 U/mL. High serum CA19-9 levels did not correlate with patient age, sex, viral status, α -fetoprotein level, tumor size, tumor grade, tumor stage, multiplicity, and vascular invasion. Patients with elevated preoperative CA19-9 levels had lower 10-year survival than those without CA19-9 elevation. Multivariate analysis revealed that CA19-9 level, tumor grade, and tumor size are independent prognostic factors for long-term survival. In conclusion, a preoperative CA19-9 value >27 U/mL is associated with poor prognosis after resection for HCC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23843733 PMCID: PMC3694498 DOI: 10.1155/2013/380797
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1The ROC curve for CA19-9 values and patient death within three years in HCC patients who underwent partial hepatectomy.
Univariate analysis of CA19-9 serum level with various clinicopathological features in 304 patients with surgically removed hepatocellular carcinoma.
| Variables | CA19-9 serum level (U/mL) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| >27 | ≤27 | ||
| Age | 0.2560 | ||
| >55 | 72 | 120 | |
| ≤55 | 34 | 78 | |
| Gender | 0.8097 | ||
| Male | 85 | 155 | |
| Female | 21 | 43 | |
| HBsAg | 0.4840 | ||
| Negative | 42 | 70 | |
| Positive | 60 | 123 | |
| Anti-HCV | 0.2552 | ||
| Negative | 68 | 143 | |
| Positive | 34 | 51 | |
|
| 0.8732 | ||
| ≤200 | 73 | 134 | |
| >200 | 25 | 50 | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.6927 | ||
| <5 | 61 | 78 | |
| ≥5 | 45 | 120 | |
| Grade | 0.7288 | ||
| 1-2 | 40 | 70 | |
| 3~4 | 65 | 128 | |
| Vascular invasion | 0.9864 | ||
| No | 68 | 128 | |
| Yes | 38 | 69 | |
| Multiple | 0.5695 | ||
| No | 74 | 145 | |
| Yes | 32 | 52 | |
| Stage | 0.7495 | ||
| I | 55 | 97 | |
| II~III | 51 | 199 | |
Figure 2Postoperative survivals calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. (a) Patients with high CA19-9 serum levels had a significantly lower overall survival than patients with low serum level. (b) Stage I patients with high CA19-9 serum levels had a significantly lower overall survival than patients with low serum level. (c) The survival of patients with high CA19-9 serum levels and stage II and III HCCs was slightly lower than patients with low CA19-9 serum levels, but the difference was not statistically significant. (d) Stage I HCC patients with high CA19-9 levels had similar prognosis with stage II and III patients. Patients with low CA19-9 values and stage I tumors had better prognosis than those with high stage tumor or high CA19-9 values.
Univariate analysis of overall survival for clinicopathological parameters.
| Clinicopathological features | Hazard ratio (HR) | 95% CI for HR |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Age (<55 versus ≥55) | 0.84 | 0.54 | 1.27 | 0.3943 |
| Gender (Male versus Female) | 1.18 | 0.70 | 1.94 | 0.5317 |
| HBV infection ((−) versus (+)) | 1.14 | 0.75 | 1.75 | 0.5403 |
| HCV infection ((−) versus (+)) | 0.89 | 0.57 | 1.41 | 0.6468 |
| AFP (<200 ng/mL versus >200 ng/mL) | 1.93 | 1.16 | 3.20 | 0.0031 |
| CA19-9 (≤27 U/mL versus >27 U/mL) | 1.87 | 1.21 | 2.90 | 0.0020 |
| Grade (1, 2 versus 3, 4) | 2.16 | 1.39 | 3.34 | 0.0001 |
| Size (<5 cm versus ≥5 cm) | 2.04 | 1.33 | 3.13 | 0.0004 |
| Vascular invasion ((−) versus (+)) | 1.70 | 1.09 | 2.66 | 0.0094 |
| Multiple ((−) versus (+)) | 1.79 | 1.11 | 2.87 | 0.0060 |
| Stage (I versus II, III) | 1.76 | 1.17 | 2.65 | 0.0057 |
Multivariate analysis of overall survival for clinicopathological parameters.
| Clinicopathological features |
| SE | Exp( | 95% CI of Exp( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFP (<200 ng/mL versus >200 ng/mL) | 0.35 | 0.24 | 1.42 | 0.89–2.27 | 0.1444 |
| CA19-9 (≤27 U/mL versus >27 U/mL) | 0.55 | 0.22 | 1.74 | 1.13–2.68 | 0.0125 |
| Grade (1, 2 versus 3, 4) | 0.49 | 0.23 | 1.62 | 1.04–2.55 | 0.0342 |
| Size (<5 cm versus ≥5 cm) | 0.58 | 0.23 | 1.78 | 1.14–2.79 | 0.0123 |
| Vascular invasion ((−) versus (+)) | 0.53 | 0.40 | 1.69 | 0.77–3.69 | 0.1895 |
| Multiple ((−) versus (+)) | 0.61 | 0.34 | 1.85 | 0.94–3.61 | 0.0742 |
| Stage (I versus II, III) | −0.35 | 0.48 | 0.71 | 0.28–1.81 | 0.4732 |