Literature DB >> 23843668

Inference for additive interaction under exposure misclassification.

Tyler J Vanderweele1.   

Abstract

Results are given concerning inferences that can be drawn about interaction when binary exposures are subject to certain forms of independent nondifferential misclassification. Tests for interaction, using the misclassified exposures, are valid provided the probability of misclassification satisfies certain bounds. Results are given for additive statistical interactions, for causal interactions corresponding to synergism in the sufficient cause framework and for so-called compositional epistasis. Both two-way and three-way interactions are considered. The results require only that the probability of misclassification be no larger than 1/2 or 1/4, depending on the test. For additive statistical interaction, a method to correct estimates and confidence intervals for misclassification is described. The consequences for power of interaction tests under exposure misclassification are explored through simulations.

Keywords:  Causal inference; Epistasis; Interaction; Misclassification; Sufficient cause; Synergism

Year:  2012        PMID: 23843668      PMCID: PMC3635711          DOI: 10.1093/biomet/ass012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrika        ISSN: 0006-3444            Impact factor:   2.445


  18 in total

1.  Confidence interval estimation of interaction.

Authors:  D W Hosmer; S Lemeshow
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Accounting for error due to misclassification of exposures in case-control studies of gene-environment interaction.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Bhramar Mukherjee; Malay Ghosh; Stephen Gruber; Victor Moreno
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Sufficient cause interactions and statistical interactions.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Estimation of the relative excess risk due to interaction and associated confidence bounds.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value?

Authors:  M Dosemeci; S Wacholder; J H Lubin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Differential misclassification and the assessment of gene-environment interactions in case-control studies.

Authors:  M García-Closas; W D Thompson; J M Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Invariants and noninvariants in the concept of interdependent effects.

Authors:  S Greenland; C Poole
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Inference for causal interactions for continuous exposures under dichotomization.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Yu Chen; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Semiparametric tests for sufficient cause interaction.

Authors:  Stijn Vansteelandt; Tyler J VanderWeele; James M Robins
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 10.  Detecting gene-gene interactions that underlie human diseases.

Authors:  Heather J Cordell
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 53.242

View more
  6 in total

1.  Tests for Gene-Environment Interactions and Joint Effects With Exposure Misclassification.

Authors:  Philip S Boonstra; Bhramar Mukherjee; Stephen B Gruber; Jaeil Ahn; Stephanie L Schmit; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental Exposure Assessment in Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Chirag J Patel; Jacqueline Kerr; Duncan C Thomas; Bhramar Mukherjee; Beate Ritz; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Marta Jankowska; Juliette Madan; Margaret R Karagas; Kimberly A McAllister; Leah E Mechanic; M Daniele Fallin; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Ian A Blair; Susan L Teitelbaum; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Sample Size and Power Calculations for Additive Interactions.

Authors:  T J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiol Methods       Date:  2012-08-01

4.  Additive interaction in the presence of a mismeasured outcome.

Authors:  Zhichao Jiang; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Additive interactions between susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified in genome-wide association studies and breast cancer risk factors in the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium.

Authors:  Amit D Joshi; Sara Lindström; Anika Hüsing; Myrto Barrdahl; Tyler J VanderWeele; Daniele Campa; Federico Canzian; Mia M Gaudet; Jonine D Figueroa; Laura Baglietto; Christine D Berg; Julie E Buring; Stephen J Chanock; María-Dolores Chirlaque; W Ryan Diver; Laure Dossus; Graham G Giles; Christopher A Haiman; Susan E Hankinson; Brian E Henderson; Robert N Hoover; David J Hunter; Claudine Isaacs; Rudolf Kaaks; Laurence N Kolonel; Vittorio Krogh; Loic Le Marchand; I-Min Lee; Eiliv Lund; Catherine A McCarty; Kim Overvad; Petra H Peeters; Elio Riboli; Fredrick Schumacher; Gianluca Severi; Daniel O Stram; Malin Sund; Michael J Thun; Ruth C Travis; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Walter C Willett; Shumin Zhang; Regina G Ziegler; Peter Kraft
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Multiplicative Interactions Under Differential Outcome Measurement Error with Perfect Specificity.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.822

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.