Literature DB >> 23843219

Playing to an audience: the social environment influences aggression and victory displays.

Lauren P Fitzsimmons1, Susan M Bertram.   

Abstract

Animal behaviour studies have begun to incorporate the influence of the social environment, providing new opportunities for studying signal strategies and evolution. We examined how the presence and sex of an audience influenced aggression and victory display behaviour in field-captured and laboratory-reared field crickets (Gryllus veletis). Audience type, rearing environment and their interaction were important predictors in all model sets. Thus, audience type may impose different costs and benefits for competing males depending on whether they are socially experienced or not. Our results suggest that field-captured winners, in particular, dynamically adjust their contest behaviour to potentially gain a reproductive benefit via female eavesdropping and may deter future aggression from rivals by advertising their aggressiveness and victories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aggression; audience effect; victory display

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23843219      PMCID: PMC3730658          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  10 in total

1.  Eavesdropping and animal conflict.

Authors:  R A Johnstone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds.

Authors:  Daniel J Mennill; Laurene M Ratcliffe; Peter T Boag
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution.

Authors:  Etienne Danchin; Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Thomas J Valone; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Social systems: demographic and genetic issues.

Authors:  Nicolas Perrin; Eric J Petit; Nelly Menard
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Guarding males protect females from predation in a wild insect.

Authors:  Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz; Amanda Bretman; Tom Tregenza
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Does signalling mitigate the cost of agonistic interactions? A test in a cricket that has lost its song.

Authors:  D M Logue; I O Abiola; D Rains; N W Bailey; M Zuk; W H Cade
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes.

Authors:  Yuying Hsu; Ryan L Earley; Larry L Wolf
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2006-02

8.  INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS: I. DIRECT AND INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS.

Authors:  Allen J Moore; Edmund D Brodie; Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Female sex pheromone-mediated effects on behavior and consequences of male competition in the shore crab (Carcinus maenas).

Authors:  Lynne U Sneddon; Felicity A Huntingford; Alan C Taylor; Anthony S Clare
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Playing to an audience: the social environment influences aggression and victory displays.

Authors:  Lauren P Fitzsimmons; Susan M Bertram
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.703

  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Using knowledge from human research to improve understanding of contest theory and contest dynamics.

Authors:  Michael M Kasumovic; Khandis Blake; Thomas F Denson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Playing to an audience: the social environment influences aggression and victory displays.

Authors:  Lauren P Fitzsimmons; Susan M Bertram
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Female mice ultrasonically interact with males during courtship displays.

Authors:  Joshua P Neunuebel; Adam L Taylor; Ben J Arthur; S E Roian Egnor
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Variation between species, populations, groups and individuals in the fitness consequences of out-group conflict.

Authors:  Amy Morris-Drake; Patrick Kennedy; Ines Braga Goncalves; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Sex-Specific Audience Effect in the Context of Mate Choice in Zebra Finches.

Authors:  Nina Kniel; Stefanie Bender; Klaudia Witte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Test of the Deception Hypothesis in Atlantic Mollies Poecilia mexicana-Does the Audience Copy a Pretended Mate Choice of Others?

Authors:  Klaudia Witte; Katharina Baumgärtner; Corinna Röhrig; Sabine Nöbel
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-13

7.  Couples showing off: Audience promotes both male and female multimodal courtship display in a songbird.

Authors:  Nao Ota; Manfred Gahr; Masayo Soma
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 14.136

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.