Literature DB >> 23842048

A 3-plex methylation assay combined with the FGFR3 mutation assay sensitively detects recurrent bladder cancer in voided urine.

Raju Kandimalla1, Roy Masius, Willemien Beukers, Chris H Bangma, Torben F Orntoft, Lars Dyrskjot, Nikki van Leeuwen, Hester Lingsma, Angela A G van Tilborg, Ellen C Zwarthoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: DNA methylation is associated with bladder cancer and these modifications could serve as useful biomarkers. FGFR3 mutations are present in 60% to 70% of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Low-grade bladder cancer recurs in more than 50% of patients. The aim of this study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a urine assay for the diagnosis of recurrences in patients with a previous primary NMIBC G1/G2 by using cystoscopy as the reference standard. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We selected eight CpG islands (CGI) methylated in bladder cancer from our earlier genome-wide study. Sensitivity of the CGIs for recurrences detection was investigated on a test set of 101 preTUR urines. Specificity was determined on 70 urines from healthy males aged more than 50 years. A 3-plex assay for the best combination was developed and validated on an independent set of 95 preTUR, recurrence free, and nonmalignant urines (n=130).
RESULTS: The 3-plex assay identified recurrent bladder cancer in voided urine with a sensitivity of 74% in the validation set. In combination with the FGFR3 mutation assay, a sensitivity of 79% was reached (specificity of 77%). Sensitivity of FGFR3 and cytology was 52% and 57%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The combination of methylation and FGFR3 assays efficiently detects recurrent bladder cancer without the need for stratification of patients regarding methylation/mutation status of the primary tumor. We conclude that the sensitivity of this combination is in the same range as cystoscopy and paves the way for a subsequent study that investigates a modified surveillance protocol consisting of the urine test followed by cystoscopy only when the urine test is positive. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23842048     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  22 in total

1.  Stratification based on methylation of TBX2 and TBX3 into three molecular grades predicts progression in patients with pTa-bladder cancer.

Authors:  Willemien Beukers; Raju Kandimalla; Roy G Masius; Marcel Vermeij; Ries Kranse; Geert Jlh van Leenders; Ellen C Zwarthoff
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity.

Authors:  Margaret A Knowles; Carolyn D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Protein shedding in urothelial bladder cancer: prognostic implications of soluble urinary EGFR and EpCAM.

Authors:  R T Bryan; H L Regan; S J Pirrie; A J Devall; K K Cheng; M P Zeegers; N D James; M A Knowles; D G Ward
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Validation and clinicopathologic associations of a urine-based bladder cancer biomarker signature.

Authors:  Ge Zhang; Evan Gomes-Giacoia; Yunfeng Dai; Adrienne Lawton; Makito Miyake; Hideki Furuya; Steve Goodison; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 5.  Trends in urine biomarker discovery for urothelial bladder cancer: DNA, RNA, or protein?

Authors:  Nada Humayun-Zakaria; Douglas G Ward; Roland Arnold; Richard T Bryan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

6.  Filtration Device for On-Site Collection, Storage and Shipment of Cells from Urine and Its Application to DNA-Based Detection of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Elin Andersson; Christina M Dahmcke; Kenneth Steven; Louise K Larsen; Per Guldberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The use of molecular analyses in voided urine for the assessment of patients with hematuria.

Authors:  Willemien Beukers; Raju Kandimalla; Diandra van Houwelingen; Hrvoje Kovacic; Jie-Fen D Chin; Hester F Lingsma; Lars Dyrskjot; Ellen C Zwarthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Size-based enrichment of exfoliated tumor cells in urine increases the sensitivity for DNA-based detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Elin Andersson; Kenneth Steven; Per Guldberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Novel multiplex MethyLight protocol for detection of DNA methylation in patient tissues and bodily fluids.

Authors:  Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel; Darko Zdravic; Ken Kron; Theodorus van der Kwast; Neil Fleshner; Bharati Bapat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Urinary Protein Biomarkers in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Jamie J D'Costa; James C Goldsmith; Jayne S Wilson; Richard T Bryan; Douglas G Ward
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2016-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.