OBJECTIVE: To describe our newly developed technique for the removal of renal stones, which we have called ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP). METHODS: UMP was performed in 62 patients using a 3.5-F ultra-thin telescope and specially designed inner and outer sheaths. A standard puncture was made and the tract was dilated up to 13 F. The outer sheath was introduced into the pelvicalyceal system and the stone was disintegrated with a 365-μ holmium laser fibre, introduced through the inner sheath. Stone fragments were evacuated using the specially designed sheath by creating an eddy current of saline; the fragments then came out automatically. RESULTS: The mean calculus size was 16.8 mm. Four of the 62 patients were children, three had a solitary kidney and two were obese. UMP was feasible in all cases with a mean (SD) 1.4 (1.0) gm/dL haemoglobin decrease and a mean hospital stay of 1.2 (0.8) days. The stone-free rate at 1 month was 86.66%. In two patients intraoperative bleeding obscured vision, requiring conversion to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. There was one postoperative complication of hydrothorax, but there were no other postoperative complications and no auxiliary procedures were required. CONCLUSIONS: UMP is a very safe and effective method of removing renal calculi up to 20 mm. The use of consumables and disposables is minimal and the patient recovery was fast. Further clinical studies and direct comparison with other available techniques are required to define the place of UMP in the treatment of low-bulk and medium-bulk renal urolithiasis. It may be particularly useful for lower calyx calculi and paediatric cases.
OBJECTIVE: To describe our newly developed technique for the removal of renal stones, which we have called ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP). METHODS: UMP was performed in 62 patients using a 3.5-F ultra-thin telescope and specially designed inner and outer sheaths. A standard puncture was made and the tract was dilated up to 13 F. The outer sheath was introduced into the pelvicalyceal system and the stone was disintegrated with a 365-μ holmium laser fibre, introduced through the inner sheath. Stone fragments were evacuated using the specially designed sheath by creating an eddy current of saline; the fragments then came out automatically. RESULTS: The mean calculus size was 16.8 mm. Four of the 62 patients were children, three had a solitary kidney and two were obese. UMP was feasible in all cases with a mean (SD) 1.4 (1.0) gm/dL haemoglobin decrease and a mean hospital stay of 1.2 (0.8) days. The stone-free rate at 1 month was 86.66%. In two patientsintraoperative bleeding obscured vision, requiring conversion to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. There was one postoperative complication of hydrothorax, but there were no other postoperative complications and no auxiliary procedures were required. CONCLUSIONS: UMP is a very safe and effective method of removing renal calculi up to 20 mm. The use of consumables and disposables is minimal and the patient recovery was fast. Further clinical studies and direct comparison with other available techniques are required to define the place of UMP in the treatment of low-bulk and medium-bulk renal urolithiasis. It may be particularly useful for lower calyx calculi and paediatric cases.
Authors: R Mager; C Balzereit; K Gust; T Hüsch; T Herrmann; U Nagele; A Haferkamp; D Schilling Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Martin Schoenthaler; Konrad Wilhelm; Simon Hein; Fabian Adams; Daniel Schlager; Ulrich Wetterauer; Azad Hawizy; Andreas Bourdoumis; Janak Desai; Arkadiusz Miernik Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Konrad Wilhelm; Simon Hein; Fabian Adams; Daniel Schlager; Arkadiusz Miernik; Martin Schoenthaler Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Namık Kemal Hatipoglu; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Gokhan Atis; Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Mesrur Selcuk Silay; Mansur Daggulli; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Tuna Karatag; Cenk Gurbuz; Abdullah Armagan; Turhan Caskurlu Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 3.436