| Literature DB >> 23840754 |
Hans-Peter Müller1, Jan Kassubek, Ina Vernikouskaya, Albert C Ludolph, Detlef Stiller, Volker Rasche.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Fast in-vivo high resolution diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the mouse brain has recently been shown to enable cohort studies by the combination of appropriate pulse sequences and cryogenically cooled resonators (CCR). The objective of this study was to apply this DTI approach at the group level to β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) transgenic mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23840754 PMCID: PMC3695895 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Resulting clusters obtained by whole brain-based spatial statistics (WBSS) of FA maps from APP mice compared to wt mice (cluster size in pixels).
| anatomical localization | hemisphere | cluster size | |
|
| caudoputamen | R | 74 |
| L | 550 | ||
| caudoputamen/ventral hippocampus | R | 85 | |
| L | 360 | ||
| dorsal hippocampus | R | 483 | |
| L | 166 | ||
| entorhinal cortex | R | 1860 | |
| L | 1027 | ||
| thalamus | median | 559 | |
| internal capsule | R | 238 | |
| L | 198 | ||
| paramedian raphe nucleus area | median | 2038 | |
| periaqueductal grey/dorsal raphe nucleus | median | 950 | |
|
| lateral septal nucleus/ventral ventricles area | median | 2537 |
| lateral cerebellum | R | 210 | |
| L | 938 |
Figure 1Results from whole brain-based spatial statistics (WBSS) of FA-maps of APP mice vs. wt mice at p<0.05, FDR corrected (axial and/or coronal views).
Increase is displayed in cold colors, reduction is displayed in hot colors. (A) bihemispheric reduction in the caudoputamen; (B) bihemispheric reduction in the caudoputamen/ventral hippocampus; (C) bihemispheric reduction in the dorsal hippocampus; (D) bihemispheric reduction in the entorhinal cortex; (E) reduction in the thalamus; (F) bihemispheric reduction in the internal capsule; (G) reduction in the paramedian raphe nucleus area; (H) reduction in the periaqueductal grey/dorsal raphe nucleus; (I) increase in the lateral septal nucleus area; (J) bihemispheric increase in the cerebellum.
Figure 2Results from whole brain-based spatial statistics (WBSS) of MD-, AD-, and RD-maps of APP mice vs. wt mice at p<0.05, FDR corrected (coronal views).
Reduction is displayed in hot colors. (A–E) MD reduction in the lateral septal nucleus, the dorsal hippocampues, the thalamus, the amygdala, and the internal capsule, respectively; (F–I) AD-reduction in the dorsal hippocampus (bihemispheric), the entorhinal cortex (bihemispheric), the dorsomedian hypothalamic nucleus region, and in the lateral septal nucleus, respectively; (J–M) RD-reduction in the cerebellum (bihemispheric), the lateral septal nucleus, the thalamus, and the dentate gyrus, respectively.
Resulting clusters obtained by whole brain-based spatial statistics (WBSS) of MD, RD, and AD maps from APP mice compared to wt mice (cluster size in pixels).
| anatomical localization | hemisphere | cluster size | |
|
| lateral septal nucleus/ventral ventricles area | median | 1704 |
| dorsal hippocampus | R | 1598 | |
| thalamus | median | 765 | |
| amygdala | L | 519 | |
| internal capsule | L | 312 | |
|
| dorsal hippocampus | R | 1919 |
| L | 1242 | ||
| entorhinal cortex | L | 1087 | |
| R | 1258 | ||
| dorsomedian hypothalamus nucleus region | R | 335 | |
| lateral septal nucleus | median | 253 | |
|
| lateral cerebellum | L | 212 |
| R | 1985 | ||
| lateral septal nucleus | median | 1410 | |
| thalamus | median | 573 | |
| dentate gyrus | R | 151 | |
| L | 98 |
Differences in significance comparing native space ROI-analysis and stereotaxic space ROI-analysis (APP mice vs. wt mice).
| group differences APP vs. wt – ROI (15 mm) | ||||||
| thalamus | entorhinal cortex | |||||
|
| ||||||
| APP | wt | APP | wt | |||
| native space | 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.37 | ||
| stereotaxic space | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.36 | ||
|
| ||||||
| native space | p = 0.003 | p = 0.015 | ||||
| stereotaxic space | p = 0.032 | p = 0.001 | ||||
Bihemispherical data were arithmetically averaged.
Figure 3Workflow of the iterative normalization process and the whole brain-based spatial statistics.
(A) (i) recorded data were transformed into a 50 µm isogrid (nearest neighbor interpolation). (ii) after linear transformation according to manually set landmarks identified using a stereotaxic mouse atlas (iii) scanner- and sequence specific b0- and FA-templates were created. (iv) data were non-linearily normalized and templates were created (v) in an iterative process. (B) whole brain-based spatial statistics (WBSS) was performed after a quality check (vi) to eliminate motion corrupted volumes. After eddy-current correction, DTI-metrics were calculated (vii). Smoothing of the DTI-metrics maps (viii), statistical voxelwise comparison (ix), correction for multiple comparisons (x), and clustering (xi) lead to significant group differences.