| Literature DB >> 24936411 |
Annie M Racine1, Nagesh Adluru2, Andrew L Alexander3, Bradley T Christian4, Ozioma C Okonkwo5, Jennifer Oh5, Caitlin A Cleary5, Alex Birdsill1, Ansel T Hillmer6, Dhanabalan Murali4, Todd E Barnhart7, Catherine L Gallagher5, Cynthia M Carlsson5, Howard A Rowley8, N Maritza Dowling5, Sanjay Asthana9, Mark A Sager10, Barbara B Bendlin5, Sterling C Johnson11.
Abstract
Some cognitively healthy individuals develop brain amyloid accumulation, suggestive of incipient Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the effect of amyloid on other potentially informative imaging modalities, such as Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), in characterizing brain changes in preclinical AD requires further exploration. In this study, a sample (N = 139, mean age 60.6, range 46 to 71) from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention (WRAP), a cohort enriched for AD risk factors, was recruited for a multimodal imaging investigation that included DTI and [C-11]Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) positron emission tomography (PET). Participants were grouped as amyloid positive (Aβ+), amyloid indeterminate (Aβi), or amyloid negative (Aβ-) based on the amount and pattern of amyloid deposition. Regional voxel-wise analyses of four DTI metrics, fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (Da), and radial diffusivity (Dr), were performed based on amyloid grouping. Three regions of interest (ROIs), the cingulum adjacent to the corpus callosum, hippocampal cingulum, and lateral fornix, were selected based on their involvement in the early stages of AD. Voxel-wise analysis revealed higher FA among Aβ+ compared to Aβ- in all three ROIs and in Aβi compared to Aβ- in the cingulum adjacent to the corpus callosum. Follow-up exploratory whole-brain analyses were consistent with the ROI findings, revealing multiple regions where higher FA was associated with greater amyloid. Lower fronto-lateral gray matter MD was associated with higher amyloid burden. Further investigation showed a negative correlation between MD and PiB signal, suggesting that Aβ accumulation impairs diffusion. Interestingly, these findings in a largely presymptomatic sample are in contradistinction to relationships reported in the literature in symptomatic disease stages of Mild Cognitive Impairment and AD, which usually show higher MD and lower FA. Together with analyses showing that cognitive function in these participants is not associated with any of the four DTI metrics, the present results suggest an early relationship between PiB and DTI, which may be a meaningful indicator of the initiating or compensatory mechanisms of AD prior to cognitive decline.Entities:
Keywords: AD risk; ANCOVA, Analysis of Covariance; ANTs, Advanced Normalization Tools; APOE4, apolipoprotein E gene ε4; Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid imaging; Aβ+, amyloid positive; Aβi, amyloid indeterminate; Aβ−, amyloid negative; BET, Brain Extraction Tool; Cingulum–CC, cingulum adjacent to corpus callosum; Cingulum–HC, hippocampal cingulum (projecting to medial temporal lobe); DTI, Diffusion Tensor Imaging; DTI-TK, Diffusion Tensor Imaging Toolkit; DVR, distribution volume ratio; Da, axial diffusivity; Dr, radial diffusivity; FA, fractional anisotropy; FH, (parental) family history; FSL, FMRIB Software Library; FUGUE, FMRIB's utility for geometrically unwarping EPIs; FWE, family wise error; GM, gray matter; HARDI, high angular resolution diffusion imaging; ICBM, International Consortium for Brain Mapping; MD, mean diffusivity; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PIB, Pittsburgh compound B; PRELUDE, phase region expanding labeler for unwrapping discrete estimates; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; SPM, Statistical Parametric Mapping; TMT, Trail Making Test; WASI, Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence; WM, white matter; WRAP, Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention; WRAT, Wide Range Achievement Test; White matter
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24936411 PMCID: PMC4053642 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.02.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Baseline characteristics of participants (n = 139)a.
| Demographic variable | Amyloid negative n = 59 | Amyloid indeterminate n = 53 | Amyloid positive n = 27 | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH positive, % | 66.1 | 60.4 | 81.5 | 0.166 |
| APOE4 positive, % | 33.9 | 32.1 | 59.3 | 0.041 |
| Female, % | 61 | 75.5 | 81.5 | 0.094 |
| Age at PiB scan | 59.74 (5.95) | 60.06 (6.0) | 63.3 (4.32) | 0.021 |
| Education | 15.76 (2.37) | 16 (2.3) | 16.3 (2.45) | 0.617 |
| WASI vocabulary | 64.81 (7.76) | 66.87 (5.90) | 65.52 (5.77) | 0.271 |
| WRAT reading | 105.12 (11.09) | 108.70 (8.60) | 108.48 (7.56) | 0.106 |
FH = parental family history of Alzheimer's disease; APOE4 = the varepsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene; PiB = Pittsburgh compound B.
All values are mean (SD) except where otherwise indicated.
Reported p-value is for omnibus test of group difference.
Fig. 1Regions of interest. The 3 ROIs assessed in this study are the cingulum-CC, which is the cingulum adjacent to the corpus callosum (green), the lateral fornix (blue), and the cingulum-HC, which is the part of the cingulum that extends from the posterior cingulum to the hippocampus (magenta).
Cognitive Testing Scores.
| Cognitive test | Baseline score | Visit test score | Difference score | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Min | Max | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Min | Max | |
| RAVLT trials 2-5 | 41.6 | 5.9 | 29 | 55 | 42 | 6.3 | 25 | 57 | − 12 | 14 |
| RAVLT delayed recall | 10.3 | 2.7 | 3 | 15 | 10.6 | 2.6 | 3 | 15 | − 7 | 10 |
| TMT part A | 26.62 | 7.9 | 14 | 52 | 25.69 | 6.82 | 14 | 52 | − 21 | 15 |
| TMT part B | 62.2 | 19.4 | 31 | 134 | 61.7 | 20.7 | 32 | 165 | − 63 | 90 |
RAVLT = Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, TMT = Trail Making Test.
Test score on study visit closest to PiB scan.
Negative difference scores for TMT represent an improvement while positive scores represent a decline because the score is time to completion. Negative difference scores for RAVLT represent a decline while positive scores represent an improvement because the test is scored by the number of correct recalls, whereby more correct recalls implies better performance.
Summary of ROI resultsa.
| DTI metric | Group comparison | Region | T-statistic | p(FWE) | p(uncorr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | Aβ + > Aβ − | Medial cingulum (R) | 4.80 | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Fornix (L) | 4.16 | 0.030 | 0.000 | ||
| Posterior cingulum (R) | 4.10 | 0.036 | 0.000 | ||
| Fornix (R) | 3.81 | 0.092 | 0.000 | ||
| Hippocampal cingulum (L) | 3.69 | 0.131 | 0.000 | ||
| Medial cingulum (L) | 3.65 | 0.144 | 0.000 | ||
| Posterior cingulum (L) | 3.55 | 0.193 | 0.000 | ||
| Aβi > Aβ − | Medial cingulum (R) | 4.56 | 0.007 | 0.000 | |
| Posterior cingulum (R) | 4.45 | 0.011 | 0.000 | ||
| Medial cingulum (L) | 3.62 | 0.158 | 0.000 |
Atrophy correction did not change the overall pattern of results. Atrophy-corrected data are presented in Inline Supplementary Table S1.
FWE = family wise error correction for multiple comparisons.
p(uncorr) = p-value uncorrected for multiple comparisons.
Fig. 2Fractional anisotropy group differences in ROIs. Significant group differences in fractional anisotropy within the three ROIs displayed on FSL's FMRIB58_FA template transformed to this study's population space. Regions where Aβ + had significantly higher FA than Aβ − (p(FWE) < .05, blue), Aβi had significantly higher FA than Aβ − (p(FWE) < .05, red), both Aβ + and Aβi had significantly higher FA than Aβ − (p(FWE) < .05, purple), Aβ + showed a trend of higher FA compared to Aβ − (p(uncorr) < .001, yellow), Aβi showed a trend of higher FA compared to Aβ − (p(uncorr) < .001, cyan), and both Aβ + and Aβi showed a trend of higher FA compared to Aβ − (p(uncorr) < .001, light green). A.) Sagittal slices from left to right. B.) Coronal slices from posterior to anterior. Left is on the left.
Summary of whole brain resultsb.
| Whole brain analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTI metric | Group comparison | Significant region | Cluster size | p(FWE) |
| FA | Aβ + > Aβ − | Superior longitudinal fasciculus (right) | 284 | 0.000 |
| Corpus callosum, genu | 352 | 0.000 | ||
| Corpus callosum, body | 144 | 0.002 | ||
| Inferior longitudinal fasciculus (right) | 421 | 0.000 | ||
| Posterior corona radiata (left) | 357 | 0.000 | ||
| Fornix (left) | 102 | 0.011 | ||
| Aβi > Aβ − | Superior corona radiata (left) | 134 | 0.003 | |
| External capsule (left) | 81 | 0.028 | ||
| Cingulate-CC (right) | 138 | 0.002 | ||
| Corpus callosum, splenium | 217 | 0.000 | ||
| Corpus callosum, body | 86 | 0.022 | ||
| Corpus callosum, genu | 80 | 0.030 | ||
| Thalamus (right) | 108 | 0.008 | ||
| MD | Aβ − > Aβ + | Fronto-lateral GM (right) | 157 | 0.024 |
p(FWE) = p-value after family wise error correction for multiple comparisons.
Atrophy correction did not change the overall pattern of results. Atrophy-corrected data are presented in Inline Supplementary Table S2.
Fig. 3Fractional anisotropy whole-brain group differences. Significant group differences (p(FWE) < .05) from whole-brain analyses in FA displayed on FSL's FMRIB58_FA template transformed to this study's population space. Regions where Aβ + had higher FA than Aβ − (blue), Aβi had higher FA than Aβ − (red), and both Aβ + and Aβi had higher FA than Aβ − (purple). A.) Sagittal slices from left to right. B.) Coronal slices from posterior to anterior. Left is on the left.
Fig. 4Mean diffusivity whole-brain group differences. Significant group differences from whole-brain analyses in MD displayed on FSL's FMRIB58_FA template transformed to this study's population space. Higher mean diffusivity was observed in Aβ − compared to Aβ + sin fronto-lateral GM, p(FWE) = 0.024. Left is on the left.
Fig. 5Mean diffusivity and PiB DVR correlation. Moderate correlation between PiB DVR and MD from the significant MD cluster from Table 4 and Fig. 4. Spearman coefficient = − 0.392.
Effect sizes of Fa, Da, and Dr in significant clusters from the ROI analysisa.
| Group contrast | Significant cluster | FA | Da | Dr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aβi > Aβ− | Right medial cingulum (p = 0.007) | 0.525897407 | − 0.194974545 | − 0.205565248 |
| Right posterior cingulum (p = 0.011) | 0.652991784 | − 0.205565903 | − 0.509913831 | |
| Aβ+ > Aβ− | Right medial cingulum (p = 0.003) | 0.400883593 | 0.081314997 | − 0.273506761 |
| Left fornix (p = 0.030) | 0.439366194 | − 0.123822204 | − 0.346614363 | |
| Right posterior cingulum (p = 0.036) | 0.549163898 | 0.088696727 | − 0.273506761 |
Values are Cohen's d. d > 0.2 constitutes a small effect size, d > 0.5 constitutes a medium effect size, and d > 0.8 constitutes a large effect size.
Summary of ROI results with atrophy correction.
| DTI metric | Group comparison | Region | T-statistic | p(FWE) | p(uncorr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | Aβ+ > Aβ− | Medial cingulum (R) | 4.75 | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Fornix (L) | 4.21 | 0.026 | 0.000 | ||
| Posterior cingulum (R) | 3.94 | 0.062 | 0.000 | ||
| Fornix (R) | 3.64 | 0.111 | 0.000 | ||
| Hippocampal cingulum (L) | 3.85 | 0.056 | 0.000 | ||
| Medial cingulum (L) | 3.27 | 0.372 | 0.001 | ||
| Posterior cingulum (L) | 3.37 | 0.301 | 0.000 | ||
| Aβi > Aβ− | Medial cingulum (R) | 4.42 | 0.012 | 0.000 | |
| Posterior cingulum (R) | 4.20 | 0.027 | 0.000 | ||
| Medial cingulum (L) | 3.28 | 0.369 | 0.001 |
FWE = family wise error correction for multiple comparisons.
p(uncorr) = p-value uncorrected for multiple comparisons.
Summary of whole brain results with atrophy correction.
| Whole brain analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTI metric | Group comparison | Significant region | Cluster Size | p(FWE) |
| FA | Aβ+ > Aβ− | Superior longitudinal fasciculus (right) | 262 | 0.000 |
| Corpus callosum, genu | 299 | 0.000 | ||
| Corpus callosum, body | 121 | 0.005 | ||
| Inferior longitudinal fasciculus (right) | 262 | 0.000 | ||
| Fornix (left) | 71 | 0.045 | ||
| Posterior cingulate (right) | 166 | 0.001 | ||
| Thalamus (right) | 80 | 0.029 | ||
| Superior corona radiata (left) | 108 | 0.008 | ||
| Aβi > Aβ− | External capsule (left) | 88 | 0.020 | |
| Posterior cingulum (right) | 122 | 0.004 | ||
| Corpus callosum, body | 122 | 0.058 | ||
| Thalamus (right) | 65 | 0.061 | ||
| Fronto-lateral GM (right) | 145 | 0.033 | ||
| MD | Aβ− > Aβ+ | Fronto-lateral GM (right) | 145 | 0.033 |
p(FWE) = p-value after family wise error correction for multiple comparisons.