Literature DB >> 23839801

Validation of a proposed warfarin dosing algorithm based on the genetic make-up of Egyptian patients.

Sherif M M Ekladious1, Marianne Samir M Issac, Sahar Abd El-Atty Sharaf, Hazem S Abou-Youssef.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Warfarin is the most frequently prescribed oral anticoagulant worldwide. Due to its narrow therapeutic index and inter-patient variability in dose requirement, this drug has been considered an ideal target for personalised medicine. Several warfarin dosing algorithms have been proposed to tailor the warfarin dosage in the European, Asian and African-American populations. However, minimal interest was directed towards Middle East countries. The factors affecting warfarin dose requirement could be different in patients from different geographical and ethnic groups, limiting the value of published dosing algorithms.
OBJECTIVE: The first objective of this study was to examine the contribution of genetic and nongenetic factors on the variability of warfarin dose requirements in the Egyptian population using an easy, cost-effective and rapid analysis of vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (VKORC1) and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping of patients. A second objective was to develop and validate an algorithm for warfarin dose prediction that is tailored to Egyptian patients.
METHODS: Eighty-four patients, 41 males and 43 females, with a median (25th-75th percentiles) age of 39 (31-48) years were recruited in this study. Fifty patients whose international normalised ratio (INR) was in the range of 2-3 were allocated to a study cohort. SYBR Green-based multiplex allele-specific real-time PCR was used for genotyping of CYP2C9 (1075A>C) and VKORC1 (1173C>T) polymorphisms. Linear regression analysis, including the variables age, gender, CYP2C9 and VKORC1 SNP genotypes, was run to derive the best model for estimating the warfarin dose that achieves an INR of 2-3. The new warfarin dosing algorithm was examined in a second cohort of patients (n=34) to check its validity. The predicted dose requirements for a subgroup of our patients were calculated according to Gage and International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC) algorithms available at http://www.warfarindosing.org.
RESULTS: In the study cohort, warfarin dose/week in VKORC1 TT subjects was statistically significantly lower than in VKORC1 CC/CT subjects (p=0.032), while there was no statistically significant difference in warfarin dose/week between CYP2C9*1*1 and *1*3 (p=0.925). A multivariate stepwise linear regression analysis revealed that age and VKORC1 had independent and significant contributions to the overall variability in warfarin dose with a p-value=0.013 and 0.042, respectively. Maintenance dose (mg/week)=65.226-0.422×(age) - 9.474×(VKORC1). The estimated regression equation was able to account for 20.5% of the overall variability in warfarin maintenance dose. A significant positive correlation, with sufficient strength, was observed between the predicted warfarin dose and the actual prescribed dose (r=0.453, p=0.001). In the validation cohort, after application of the dosing algorithm, correlation between predicted and actual dose was statistically significant (p=0.023). The equation was particularly successful among patients with a dose≥35 mg/week. The correlation coefficient between the actual and predicted doses for IWPC and Gage were 0.304 and 0.276, respectively. When compared with our algorithm (r=0.279), the difference was non-significant: p=0.903 and 0.990, respectively.
CONCLUSION: VKORC1 (1173C>T) contributes to the warfarin dose variability. Patients' age and genetic variants of VKORC1 account for nearly 20.5% of the variability in warfarin dose required to achieve an INR of 2-3. The success of a prediction equation based on these variables was proved in a different cohort: the predicted dose correlated significantly with the maintenance dose and the equation was more successful among patients with a dose≥35 mg/week. The results of the warfarin algorithm we developed were comparable with those of the IWPC and Gage algorithms with the advantage of using one SNP (VKORC1 1173C>T) only. This represents an economic advantage in our community. Replication of this study in a larger cohort of patients is necessary before translation of this knowledge into clinical guidelines for warfarin prescription.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23839801     DOI: 10.1007/s40291-013-0046-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1177-1062            Impact factor:   4.074


  48 in total

1.  Point: use of pharmacogenetics in guiding treatment with warfarin.

Authors:  Mia Wadelius
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  A polymorphism in the VKORC1 regulator calumenin predicts higher warfarin dose requirements in African Americans.

Authors:  D Voora; D C Koboldt; C R King; P A Lenzini; C S Eby; R Porche-Sorbet; E Deych; M Crankshaw; P E Milligan; H L McLeod; S R Patel; L H Cavallari; P M Ridker; G R Grice; R D Miller; B F Gage
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 3.  Warfarin dose and the pharmacogenomics of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 - rationale and perspectives.

Authors:  Tong Yin; Toshiyuki Miyata
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 3.944

4.  The impact of genetic polymorphisms and patient characteristics on warfarin dose requirements: a cross-sectional study in Iran.

Authors:  Soha Namazi; Negar Azarpira; Fatemeh Hendijani; Maryam Banan Khorshid; Ghazal Vessal; Ahmad Reza Mehdipour
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  Haptoglobin polymorphism in Egyptians.

Authors:  Z Habib
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.533

6.  Warfarin sensitivity related to CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1 (MDR1) and other factors.

Authors:  M Wadelius; K Sörlin; O Wallerman; J Karlsson; Q-Y Yue; P K E Magnusson; C Wadelius; H Melhus
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.550

7.  Mutations in VKORC1 cause warfarin resistance and multiple coagulation factor deficiency type 2.

Authors:  Simone Rost; Andreas Fregin; Vytautas Ivaskevicius; Ernst Conzelmann; Konstanze Hörtnagel; Hans-Joachim Pelz; Knut Lappegard; Erhard Seifried; Inge Scharrer; Edward G D Tuddenham; Clemens R Müller; Tim M Strom; Johannes Oldenburg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Pharmacogenetics of warfarin: regulatory, scientific, and clinical issues.

Authors:  Brian F Gage; Lawrence J Lesko
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Genetic and clinical factors relating to warfarin dosing.

Authors:  Daniel E Jonas; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 14.819

10.  Validation of pharmacogenetic algorithms and warfarin dosing table in Egyptian patients.

Authors:  Naglaa Samir Bazan; Nirmeen Ahmed Sabry; Amal Rizk; Sherif Mokhtar; Osama Badary
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2012-07-27
View more
  9 in total

1.  Non-genetic factors and polymorphisms in genes CYP2C9 and VKORC1: predictive algorithms for TTR in Brazilian patients on warfarin.

Authors:  Marcus Fernando S Praxedes; Maria Auxiliadora P Martins; Aline O M Mourão; Karina B Gomes; Edna A Reis; Renan P Souza; Emílio Itamar F Campos; Daniel D Ribeiro; Manoel Otávio C Rocha
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Prospective validation of the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium algorithm in high-risk elderly people (VIALE study).

Authors:  Amelia Filippelli; Simona Signoriello; Ciro Bancone; Graziamaria Corbi; Valentina Manzo; Severino Iesu; Cecilia Politi; Alberto Gigantino; Maria Teresa De Donato; Paolo Masiello; Vittorio Simeon; Alessandro Della Corte; Michele Cellurale; Valeria Conti; Massimo Frigino; Tiziana Ciarambino; Marta Marracino; Laura Carpenito; Nicola Ferrara; Marisa De Feo; Ciro Gallo
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Is there a role for MDR1, EPHX1 and protein Z gene variants in modulation of warfarin dosage? a study on a cohort of the Egyptian population.

Authors:  Marianne Samir Makboul Issac; Maggie S El-Nahid; Marian Youssry Wissa
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Clinical application of a new warfarin-dosing regimen based on the CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes in atrial fibrillation patients.

Authors:  Nian-Xin Jiang; Jun-Wei Ge; Yu-Qiong Xian; Shao-Ying Huang; Yan-Song Li
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-02-26

Review 5.  The Impact of Genetic and Non-Genetic Factors on Warfarin Dose Prediction in MENA Region: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Loulia Akram Bader; Hazem Elewa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluation of a pharmacogenetic-based warfarin dosing algorithm in patients with low time in therapeutic range - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Leiliane Rodrigues Marcatto; Luciana Sacilotto; Carolina Tosin Bueno; Mirella Facin; Celia Maria Cassaro Strunz; Francisco Carlos Costa Darrieux; Maurício Ibrahim Scanavacca; Jose Eduardo Krieger; Alexandre Costa Pereira; Paulo Caleb Junior Lima Santos
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Evaluation of CYP2C9- and VKORC1-based pharmacogenetic algorithm for warfarin dose in Gaza-Palestine.

Authors:  Basim Mohammad Ayesh; Ahmed Shaker Abu Shaaban; Abdalla Asaf Abed
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2018-01-10

Review 8.  Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms on Phenytoin Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Outcomes in the Middle East and North Africa Region.

Authors:  Renée Dagenais; Kyle John Wilby; Hazem Elewa; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2017-09

9.  Verification of pharmacogenetics-based warfarin dosing algorithms in Han-Chinese patients undertaking mechanic heart valve replacement.

Authors:  Li Zhao; Chunxia Chen; Bei Li; Li Dong; Yingqiang Guo; Xijun Xiao; Eryong Zhang; Li Qin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.