Literature DB >> 23839799

To what extent do food preferences explain the trophic position of heterotrophic and mixotrophic microbial consumers in a Sphagnum peatland?

Vincent E J Jassey1, Caroline Meyer, Christine Dupuy, Nadine Bernard, Edward A D Mitchell, Marie-Laure Toussaint, Marc Metian, Auriel P Chatelain, Daniel Gilbert.   

Abstract

Although microorganisms are the primary drivers of biogeochemical cycles, the structure and functioning of microbial food webs are poorly studied. This is the case in Sphagnum peatlands, where microbial communities play a key role in the global carbon cycle. Here, we explored the structure of the microbial food web from a Sphagnum peatland by analyzing (1) the density and biomass of different microbial functional groups, (2) the natural stable isotope (δ(13)C and δ(15)N) signatures of key microbial consumers (testate amoebae), and (3) the digestive vacuole contents of Hyalosphenia papilio, the dominant testate amoeba species in our system. Our results showed that the feeding type of testate amoeba species (bacterivory, algivory, or both) translates into their trophic position as assessed by isotopic signatures. Our study further demonstrates, for H. papilio, the energetic benefits of mixotrophy when the density of its preferential prey is low. Overall, our results show that testate amoebae occupy different trophic levels within the microbial food web, depending on their feeding behavior, the density of their food resources, and their metabolism (i.e., mixotrophy vs. heterotrophy). Combined analyses of predation, community structure, and stable isotopes now allow the structure of microbial food webs to be more completely described, which should lead to improved models of microbial community function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23839799     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-013-0262-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  27 in total

1.  Interactive effects of body-size structure and adaptive foraging on food-web stability.

Authors:  Lotta Heckmann; Barbara Drossel; Ulrich Brose; Christian Guill
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Mixotrophic basis of Atlantic oligotrophic ecosystems.

Authors:  Manuela Hartmann; Carolina Grob; Glen A Tarran; Adrian P Martin; Peter H Burkill; David J Scanlan; Mikhail V Zubkov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Integrating food web diversity, structure and stability.

Authors:  Neil Rooney; Kevin S McCann
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Effects of urban particulate deposition on microbial communities living in bryophytes: an experimental study.

Authors:  C Meyer; N Bernard; M Moskura; M L Toussaint; F Denayer; D Gilbert
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 6.291

5.  Warming alters the metabolic balance of ecosystems.

Authors:  Gabriel Yvon-Durocher; J Iwan Jones; Mark Trimmer; Guy Woodward; Jose M Montoya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Quantitative approaches to the analysis of stable isotope food web data.

Authors:  Stephanie N Schmidt; Julian D Olden; Christopher T Solomon; M Jake Vander Zanden
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 7.  Ecological networks--beyond food webs.

Authors:  Thomas C Ings; José M Montoya; Jordi Bascompte; Nico Blüthgen; Lee Brown; Carsten F Dormann; François Edwards; David Figueroa; Ute Jacob; J Iwan Jones; Rasmus B Lauridsen; Mark E Ledger; Hannah M Lewis; Jens M Olesen; F J Frank van Veen; Phil H Warren; Guy Woodward
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  The effect of diet and temperature on reproductive rate in Arcella vulgaris Ehrenberg (Sarcodina: Testacida).

Authors:  Gohanna Laybourn; Lindsay Whymant
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Mixotrophic organisms become more heterotrophic with rising temperature.

Authors:  Susanne Wilken; Jef Huisman; Suzanne Naus-Wiezer; Ellen Van Donk
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  The soil food web of two beech forests (Fagus sylvatica) of contrasting humus type: stable isotope analysis of a macro- and a mesofauna-dominated community.

Authors:  S Scheu; M Falca
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  4 in total

1.  Microbial Communities as Environmental Indicators of Ecological Disturbance in Restored Carbonate Fen-Results of 10 Years of Studies.

Authors:  Tomasz Mieczan; Monika Tarkowska-Kukuryk
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 2.  The Ecology and Evolution of Amoeba-Bacterium Interactions.

Authors:  Yijing Shi; David C Queller; Yuehui Tian; Siyi Zhang; Qingyun Yan; Zhili He; Zhenzhen He; Chenyuan Wu; Cheng Wang; Longfei Shu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Peatland Microbial Communities as Indicators of the Extreme Atmospheric Dust Deposition.

Authors:  B Fiałkiewicz-Kozieł; B Smieja-Król; T M Ostrovnaya; M Frontasyeva; A Siemińska; M Lamentowicz
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.520

4.  An unexpected role for mixotrophs in the response of peatland carbon cycling to climate warming.

Authors:  Vincent E J Jassey; Constant Signarbieux; Stephan Hättenschwiler; Luca Bragazza; Alexandre Buttler; Frédéric Delarue; Bertrand Fournier; Daniel Gilbert; Fatima Laggoun-Défarge; Enrique Lara; Robert T E Mills; Edward A D Mitchell; Richard J Payne; Bjorn J M Robroek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.