| Literature DB >> 26603894 |
Vincent E J Jassey1,2, Constant Signarbieux1,2, Stephan Hättenschwiler3, Luca Bragazza1,2,4, Alexandre Buttler1,2,5, Frédéric Delarue6,7,8, Bertrand Fournier9, Daniel Gilbert5, Fatima Laggoun-Défarge6,7,8, Enrique Lara9, Robert T E Mills1,2, Edward A D Mitchell9,10, Richard J Payne11, Bjorn J M Robroek1,2.
Abstract
Mixotrophic protists are increasingly recognized for their significant contribution to carbon (C) cycling. As phototrophs they contribute to photosynthetic C fixation, whilst as predators of decomposers, they indirectly influence organic matter decomposition. Despite these direct and indirect effects on the C cycle, little is known about the responses of peatland mixotrophs to climate change and the potential consequences for the peatland C cycle. With a combination of field and microcosm experiments, we show that mixotrophs in the Sphagnum bryosphere play an important role in modulating peatland C cycle responses to experimental warming. We found that five years of consecutive summer warming with peaks of +2 to +8°C led to a 50% reduction in the biomass of the dominant mixotrophs, the mixotrophic testate amoebae (MTA). The biomass of other microbial groups (including decomposers) did not change, suggesting MTA to be particularly sensitive to temperature. In a microcosm experiment under controlled conditions, we then manipulated the abundance of MTA, and showed that the reported 50% reduction of MTA biomass in the field was linked to a significant reduction of net C uptake (-13%) of the entire Sphagnum bryosphere. Our findings suggest that reduced abundance of MTA with climate warming could lead to reduced peatland C fixation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26603894 PMCID: PMC4658499 DOI: 10.1038/srep16931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Bryophyte-microbial food web system in peatlands.
CO2 fixation within the bryosphere is performed by Sphagnum moss, photosynthetic protists and mixotrophic protists, as well as cyanobacteria. Mixotrophic protists and heterotrophic protists are involved in numerous trophic interactions influencing the decomposition of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) by bacteria and fungi, and the transfer of energy and nutrients among the various components of the microbial food web. These interactions contribute to the control of the bryosphere C balance. The representation is strongly simplified as it does not show all of the potential trophic relations with microfauna and ignoring a number of other roles of protist communities. Adapted from71749.
Figure 2Biomass of different microbial groups in the food web associated to Sphagnum mosses from control and warmed plots over five years of experimental field warming (Forbonnet peatland, France).
The effect of temperature increase was tested on mixotrophic testate amoeba biomass (mean ± SE) (a) total microbial biomass (b) bacteria (c) fungi (d) cyanobacteria (e) microalgae (f) heterotrophic testate amoebae (g) ciliates (h) and small-sized metazoans (rotifers and nematodes) (i). Grey bars indicate ambient treatment (control) and white bars warmed treatment. Asterisks indicate significant differences between control and warmed plots for each year separately. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
ANOVA table of F and P values on the effect of sampling date (D), warming treatment (W), and possible interactions on functional groups of organisms of a peatland microbial food web (field experiment).
| Date (D) | Warming (W) | W × D | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total biomass | 29.32 | 8.01 | 0.02 | 0.72 | 0.4 | |
| Microalgae | 0.05 | 0.94 | 0.06 | 0.81 | ||
| Cyanobacteria | 0.96 | 0.33 | 0.08 | 0.78 | 0.37 | 0.55 |
| Ciliates | 3.93 | 0.055 | 0.70 | 0.42 | 3.41 | 0.07 |
| Heterotrophic testate amoebae | 2.30 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.86 | 1.30 | 0.26 |
| Mixotrophic testate amoebae | 0.06 | 0.79 | ||||
| Small-sized metazoans (rotifers and nematodes) | 0.14 | 0.72 | 0.47 | 0.49 | ||
| Bacteria | 1.94 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.72 | 0.05 | 0.94 |
| Fungi | 0.001 | 0.97 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 0.41 | 0.52 |
Bold characters indicate significant effects (P-value < 0.05).
Figure 3Relationship between the response of mixotrophic testate amoebae (MTA) to warming and the magnitude of OTC warming.
Relationship between the MTA standardized effect size (MTA biomass in OTCs –MTA biomass in controls/standard deviation in controls) as a function of the number of summer days with OTC effects higher than 3 °C (mean OTC temperature minus mean control temperature). n = 24; R = 0.35; r = −0.60; P = 0.02; r is the coefficient of correlation from linear mixed effect model.
Figure 4Response of the bryosphere components (Sphagnum and associated mixotrophic testate amoebae and microalgae) to full light (PPFD of 600 μmol m−2 s−1) and dark treatments (no light) in microcosms (mean ± SE).
The effect of light conditions was tested on bryosphere photosynthetic capacity (Amax, bryo) (a) bryopshere maximum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) (b) and bryosphere chlorophyll a+b content (c) microalgae (left) and mixotrophic testate amoeba (right) abundance (d) microalgae (left) and mixotrophic testate amoeba (right) biomass (e) microbial chlorophyll a+b content (f). White bars indicate light treatment and black bars dark treatment. Asterisks indicate significant differences between light and dark treatment. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 5Bryosphere photosynthetic capacity (Amax, bryo).
Amax, bryo is shown either as a function of the abundance of mixotrophic testate amoebae (log-transformed) (a) or as a function of microalgae (log-transformed) (b).