Literature DB >> 29234938

Impact of incisional hernia development following abdominal operations on total healthcare cost.

Vamsi V Alli1, Jianying Zhang2, Dana A Telem3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Introduction of the category III CPT code (0437T) for prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA) highlights efforts to reduce incisional hernia (IH). PMA's value in the context of value-based care requires understanding both the cost of IH development and the savings from prevention. We hypothesized large healthcare costs with IH development. Appreciating which subsets of patients are at highest risk for IH, and the subsets who have the costliest care is essential in targeting interventions for hernia prevention.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study utilizing data from Truven Health Analytic MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database from calendar years 2011-2014. Adults undergoing open abdominal operations with continued enrollment 3-year post-surgery were included. Inpatient and outpatient claims were tracked over 3 years to identify IH. Quantile regression estimated the association between conditional distribution of total cost and IH. A generalized linear model with gamma distribution estimated the association of conditional mean of total cost and IH. Models were adjusted for confounding cost covariates (e.g., age, gender, obesity, smoking, cancer).
RESULTS: 14,290 patients were identified, 1294 (9.1%) developed IH, 48% within 1-year, 33% at 1-2 years, and 19% at 2-3 years post-surgery. 515 underwent stoma creation, 4579 colon resection, 2263 liver/kidney, 3890 peritoneal, 3043 other (foregut, appendectomy, cholecystectomy). Rate of IH formation was 25, 13, 5.9, 6.3, and 6.3%, respectively. The difference in median expenditures for IH development versus no IH was ostomies: $26,098, colorectal: $21,211, liver/kidney: $23,811, peritoneal: $25,554, others: $28,870 (p < 0.0.01). IH within 1 year was more expensive than within 3 years in the following categories: colorectal ($16,034, p = 0.0385), liver/kidney ($27,145, p = 0.0004), and ostomy ($18,992, p = 0.0035).
CONCLUSION: IH is a common occurrence imposing significant healthcare burden. Higher costs occur when IH occurs within 1 year versus 3 years from the index-procedure. This highlights the importance of hernia prevention techniques and the question of whether temporizing closure adjuncts  are appropriate in high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hernia phenotype; Hernia prevention; Incisional hernia; Prophylactic mesh augmentation; Value-based care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29234938     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5936-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy.

Authors:  A Bhangu; J E Fitzgerald; P Singh; N Battersby; P Marriott; T Pinkney
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zachary M Borab; Sameer Shakir; Michael A Lanni; Michael G Tecce; John MacDonald; William W Hope; John P Fischer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Mesh reinforcement for the prevention of incisional hernia formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xi-Chen Wang; Dan Zhang; Zeng-Xi Yang; Jian-Xin Gan; Lan-Ning Yin
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 4.  A systematic review of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hasanin Al Chalabi; John Larkin; Brian Mehigan; Paul McCormick
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 6.071

5.  PREBIOUS trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of PREventive midline laparotomy closure with a BIOabsorbable mesh for the prevention of incisional hernia: rationale and design.

Authors:  Manuel López-Cano; José A Pereira; Roberto Lozoya; Xavier Feliu; Rafael Villalobos; Salvador Navarro; Maria Antonia Arbós; Manuel Armengol-Carrasco
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs.

Authors:  Alfredo M Carbonell; Cory N Criss; William S Cobb; Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs.

Authors:  Arnab Majumder; Joshua S Winder; Yuxiang Wen; Eric M Pauli; Igor Belyansky; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  A Risk Model and Cost Analysis of Incisional Hernia After Elective, Abdominal Surgery Based Upon 12,373 Cases: The Case for Targeted Prophylactic Intervention.

Authors:  John P Fischer; Marten N Basta; Michael N Mirzabeigi; Andrew R Bauder; Justin P Fox; Jeffrey A Drebin; Joseph M Serletti; Stephen J Kovach
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery - Is there any consensus?

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; Phillip Knebel; Markus K Diener; Christoph Seidlmayer; Karsten Ridwelski; Hartmut Stöltzing; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Prophylactic Mesh After Midline Laparotomy: Evidence is out There, but why do Surgeons Hesitate?

Authors:  Martijn Depuydt; Mathias Allaeys; Luis Abreu de Carvalho; Aude Vanlander; Frederik Berrevoet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure.

Authors:  C Stabilini; M A Garcia-Urena; F Berrevoet; D Cuccurullo; S Capoccia Giovannini; M Dajko; L Rossi; K Decaestecker; M López Cano
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  The effect of prophylactic mesh implantation on the development of incisional hernias in patients with elevated BMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Pianka; A Werba; R Klotz; F Schuh; E Kalkum; P Probst; A Ramouz; E Khajeh; M W Büchler; J C Harnoss
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.920

4.  A simplified method to evaluate the loss of domain.

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Al Sadairi; Jules Durtette-Guzylack; Arnaud Renard; Carole Durot; Aurore Thierry; Reza Kianmanesh; Guillaume Passot; Yohann Renard
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.920

5.  Relationship Between Diverticular Disease and Incisional Hernia After Elective Colectomy: a Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Numa P Perez; David C Chang; Robert N Goldstone; Liliana Bordeianou; Rocco Ricciardi; Paul M Cavallaro
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.