BACKGROUND: This study assessed the prognostic value of stress-gated 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) and prior revascularization according to the presence and severity of ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the outcome of 472 patients with multivessel CAD and prior revascularization (coronary angioplasty, 290 patients; bypass surgery, 182 patients), who underwent exercise or dipyridamole 99mTc-sestamibi MPS for evaluation of ischemia. Visual scoring of perfusion images used 20 segments and a 5-point scale. Gated post-stress EF was automatically calculated. Endpoints included hard events: cardiac death (CD) and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). During a mean follow-up of 3.0 ± 1.0 years, 37 hard events occurred, including CD in 15 (3%) and MI in 22 (5%) patients. In a risk-adjusted multivariable Cox model, a history of prior MI, diabetes, abnormal MPS, moderate-to-severe ischemia, and post-stress EF <35% were important predictors of cardiac events. Four-year risk-adjusted survival was 97.9% for normal MPS, 87.3% for abnormal MPS with ischemia, and 82.1% for moderate-to-severe ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with previous coronary revascularization, stress-gated 99mTc-sestamibi MPS provides prognostic information for the prediction of cardiac events. A normal perfusion scan confers an excellent prognosis and an exceedingly low hard event rate (<1%/year). The presence of moderate-to-severe ischemia or a post-stress EF <35% identifies patients at highest risk of subsequent cardiac events.
BACKGROUND: This study assessed the prognostic value of stress-gated 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) and prior revascularization according to the presence and severity of ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the outcome of 472 patients with multivessel CAD and prior revascularization (coronary angioplasty, 290 patients; bypass surgery, 182 patients), who underwent exercise or dipyridamole 99mTc-sestamibi MPS for evaluation of ischemia. Visual scoring of perfusion images used 20 segments and a 5-point scale. Gated post-stress EF was automatically calculated. Endpoints included hard events: cardiac death (CD) and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). During a mean follow-up of 3.0 ± 1.0 years, 37 hard events occurred, including CD in 15 (3%) and MI in 22 (5%) patients. In a risk-adjusted multivariable Cox model, a history of prior MI, diabetes, abnormal MPS, moderate-to-severe ischemia, and post-stress EF <35% were important predictors of cardiac events. Four-year risk-adjusted survival was 97.9% for normal MPS, 87.3% for abnormal MPS with ischemia, and 82.1% for moderate-to-severe ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with previous coronary revascularization, stress-gated 99mTc-sestamibi MPS provides prognostic information for the prediction of cardiac events. A normal perfusion scan confers an excellent prognosis and an exceedingly low hard event rate (<1%/year). The presence of moderate-to-severe ischemia or a post-stress EF <35% identifies patients at highest risk of subsequent cardiac events.
Authors: S C Smith; J T Dove; A K Jacobs; J W Kennedy; D Kereiakes; M J Kern; R E Kuntz; J J Popma; H V Schaff; D O Williams; R J Gibbons; J P Alpert; K A Eagle; D P Faxon; V Fuster; T J Gardner; G Gregoratos; R O Russell; S C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Francis J Klocke; Michael G Baird; Beverly H Lorell; Timothy M Bateman; Joseph V Messer; Daniel S Berman; Patrick T O'Gara; Blase A Carabello; Richard O Russell; Manuel D Cerqueira; Martin G St John Sutton; Anthony N DeMaria; James E Udelson; J Ward Kennedy; Mario S Verani; Kim Allan Williams; Elliott M Antman; Sidney C Smith; Joseph S Alpert; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jeffrey L Anderson; Loren F Hiratzka; David P Faxon; Sharon Ann Hunt; Valentin Fuster; Alice K Jacobs; Raymond J Gibbons; Richard O Russell Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Patrick W Serruys; Andrew T L Ong; Lex A van Herwerden; J Eduardo Sousa; Adib Jatene; Johannes J R M Bonnier; Jacques P M A Schönberger; Nigel Buller; Robert Bonser; Clemens Disco; Bianca Backx; Paul G Hugenholtz; Brian G Firth; Felix Unger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-08-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Antonio Abbate; Giuseppe G L Biondi-Zoccai; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Michael J Lipinski; George W Vetrovec Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-03-23 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: M J Zellweger; H C Lewin; S Lai; E A Dubois; J D Friedman; G Germano; X Kang; T Sharir; D S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Y Cottin; K Rezaizadeh; C Touzery; I Barillot; M Zeller; S Prevot; I L'huillier; O Ressencourt; F André; M Fraison; P Louis; F Brunotte; J E Wolf Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: T Sharir; G Germano; X Kang; H C Lewin; R Miranda; I Cohen; R D Agafitei; J D Friedman; D S Berman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Michael J Zellweger; Markus Weinbacher; Andreas W Zutter; Raban V Jeger; Jan Mueller-Brand; Christoph Kaiser; Peter T Buser; Matthias E Pfisterer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-07-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Abdou Elhendy; Arend F l Schinkel; Ron T van Domburg; Jeroen J Bax; Roelf Valkema; Don Poldermans Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: D S Berman; H Kiat; J D Friedman; F P Wang; K van Train; L Matzer; J Maddahi; G Germano Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jorge Daniel Oldan; Linda K Shaw; Paul Hofmann; Matthew Phelan; Jeffrey Nelson; Robert Pagnanelli; Salvador Borges-Neto Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Se Hun Kang; Hyo In Choi; Young Hak Kim; Eun Young Lee; Jung Min Ahn; Seungbong Han; Pil Hyung Lee; Jae Hyung Roh; Sung Han Yun; Duk Woo Park; Soo Jin Kang; Seung Whan Lee; Cheol Whan Lee; Dae Hyuk Moon; Seong Wook Park; Seung Jung Park Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.759