Literature DB >> 23839122

Point success rate for patient therapeutic response prediction by continuous biomarker scores.

Zhenjun Ma1, Youngchul Kim2, Feifang Hu1, Jae K Lee3.   

Abstract

Various predictive diagnostic tests are highly demanded to guide optimal treatments for individual patients, as individual patients with the same disease such as cancer frequently exhibit dramatically different therapeutic responses to multiple available treatment options. A large number of clinical trials have thus been performed to test the predictive ability and utility of various therapeutic biomarker tests. However, in these trial designs the conventional optimization criteria such as positive predictive value or negative predictive value cannot reflect each patient's true chance of success associated with continuous predictive biomarker scores. We have developed a novel statistical concept, point success rate (PSR), to overcome deficiencies in these conventional methods for optimizing biomarker-based clinical trials. We demonstrate statistical superiority as well as clinical improvement by a PSR-based treatment selection both with simulated and breast cancer patient data.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COXEN; biomarker; personalized chemotherapy; point success rate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23839122      PMCID: PMC7771551          DOI: 10.1177/0962280213493161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  13 in total

Review 1.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification.

Authors:  Richard Simon; Michael D Radmacher; Kevin Dobbin; Lisa M McShane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation.

Authors:  David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Pharmacogenomic predictor of sensitivity to preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth R Hess; Keith Anderson; W Fraser Symmans; Vicente Valero; Nuhad Ibrahim; Jaime A Mejia; Daniel Booser; Richard L Theriault; Aman U Buzdar; Peter J Dempsey; Roman Rouzier; Nour Sneige; Jeffrey S Ross; Tatiana Vidaurre; Henry L Gómez; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Lynda Sawyer; Lisa Gatti; Dominic T Moore; Frances Collichio; David W Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor; Mark L Graham; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Molecular markers of urothelial cancer and their use in the monitoring of superficial urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Black; Gordon A Brown; Colin P Dinney
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lecia V Sequist; Daphne W Bell; Thomas J Lynch; Daniel A Haber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A strategy for predicting the chemosensitivity of human cancers and its application to drug discovery.

Authors:  Jae K Lee; Dmytro M Havaleshko; Hyungjun Cho; John N Weinstein; Eric P Kaldjian; John Karpovich; Andrew Grimshaw; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Triple negative breast carcinoma and the basal phenotype: from expression profiling to clinical practice.

Authors:  Leslie K Diaz; Vincent L Cryns; W Fraser Symmans; Nour Sneige
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.875

10.  A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling.

Authors:  P K Julka; R T Chacko; S Nag; R Parshad; A Nair; D S Oh; Z Hu; C B Koppiker; S Nair; R Dawar; N Dhindsa; I D Miller; D Ma; B Lin; B Awasthy; C M Perou
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.