C Neill Epperson1, Mary D Sammel, Ellen W Freeman. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Penn Center for Women's Behavioral Wellness, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. cepp@mail.med.upenn.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: Although cognitive complaints are common among menopausal women, it is debatable whether there is an objective decline in cognition with menopause that exceeds what is expected with normal aging. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether reproductive senescence is associated with an age-independent decline in verbal memory. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was a 14-year, longitudinal, population-based cohort study of women who underwent yearly endocrine, behavioral, and cognitive assessments from pre- to postmenopause. PARTICIPANTS: Caucasian and African American premenopausal women (n = 403), who were enrolled in the Penn Ovarian Aging Study, participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Buschke Selective Reminding Test (immediate and delayed verbal recall), the digit symbol substitution task, and the symbol copy task were used to measure outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3958 assessments were conducted in this sample of 403 women. In models that were adjusted for age and important cofactors, immediate (P = .03) and delayed (P = .03) recall on the Buschke Selective Reminding Test declined from the pre- to postmenopausal stages. Further evaluation identified a significant decline (P < .002) in delayed recall early in the transition and immediate recall (P = .04) late in the transition. Race was a significant factor in performance on all tasks (all P < .0001) except the delayed verbal recall task (P = .06) in adjusted models. Endocrine measures were significantly associated with cognitive performance in unadjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Certain cognitive domains are sensitive to the physiological changes of reproductive senescence independent of age. The differences in cognitive performance between African American and Caucasian women were not explained by factors examined in this study but are of important public health concern that warrants further investigation.
CONTEXT: Although cognitive complaints are common among menopausal women, it is debatable whether there is an objective decline in cognition with menopause that exceeds what is expected with normal aging. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether reproductive senescence is associated with an age-independent decline in verbal memory. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was a 14-year, longitudinal, population-based cohort study of women who underwent yearly endocrine, behavioral, and cognitive assessments from pre- to postmenopause. PARTICIPANTS: Caucasian and African American premenopausal women (n = 403), who were enrolled in the Penn Ovarian Aging Study, participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Buschke Selective Reminding Test (immediate and delayed verbal recall), the digit symbol substitution task, and the symbol copy task were used to measure outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3958 assessments were conducted in this sample of 403 women. In models that were adjusted for age and important cofactors, immediate (P = .03) and delayed (P = .03) recall on the Buschke Selective Reminding Test declined from the pre- to postmenopausal stages. Further evaluation identified a significant decline (P < .002) in delayed recall early in the transition and immediate recall (P = .04) late in the transition. Race was a significant factor in performance on all tasks (all P < .0001) except the delayed verbal recall task (P = .06) in adjusted models. Endocrine measures were significantly associated with cognitive performance in unadjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Certain cognitive domains are sensitive to the physiological changes of reproductive senescence independent of age. The differences in cognitive performance between African American and Caucasian women were not explained by factors examined in this study but are of important public health concern that warrants further investigation.
Authors: Sally A Shumaker; Claudine Legault; Lewis Kuller; Stephen R Rapp; Leon Thal; Dorothy S Lane; Howard Fillit; Marcia L Stefanick; Susan L Hendrix; Cora E Lewis; Kamal Masaki; Laura H Coker Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-06-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mark A Espeland; Stephen R Rapp; Sally A Shumaker; Robert Brunner; JoAnn E Manson; Barbara B Sherwin; Judith Hsia; Karen L Margolis; Patricia E Hogan; Robert Wallace; Maggie Dailey; Ruth Freeman; Jennifer Hays Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-06-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Dorene M Rentz; Blair K Weiss; Emily G Jacobs; Sara Cherkerzian; Anne Klibanski; Anne Remington; Harlyn Aizley; Jill M Goldstein Journal: Menopause Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: C Neill Epperson; Sheila Shanmugan; Deborah R Kim; Sarah Mathews; Kathryn A Czarkowski; Jeanette Bradley; Dina H Appleby; Claudia Iannelli; Mary D Sammel; Thomas E Brown Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Fiona C Baker; Negin Sattari; Massimiliano de Zambotti; Aimee Goldstone; William A Alaynick; Sara C Mednick Journal: Neurobiol Learn Mem Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Rebecca C Thurston; Pauline M Maki; Carol A Derby; Ervin Sejdić; Howard J Aizenstein Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Rebecca A Nebel; Neelum T Aggarwal; Lisa L Barnes; Aimee Gallagher; Jill M Goldstein; Kejal Kantarci; Monica P Mallampalli; Elizabeth C Mormino; Laura Scott; Wai Haung Yu; Pauline M Maki; Michelle M Mielke Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Pauline M Maki; Leah H Rubin; Antonia Savarese; Lauren Drogos; Lee P Shulman; Suzanne Banuvar; David R Walega Journal: Maturitas Date: 2016-07-17 Impact factor: 4.342