Rebecca C Thurston1, Pauline M Maki2, Carol A Derby3, Ervin Sejdić4, Howard J Aizenstein5. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: thurstonrc@upmc.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. 4. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test whether more physiologically assessed hot flashes were associated with more connectivity in the default mode network (DMN), the network of brain regions active during rest. We particularly focus on DMN networks supporting the hippocampus as this region is rich in estrogen (E) receptors (ER) and has previously been linked to hot flashes. DESIGN: Women underwent 24 hours of physiologic and diary hot flash monitoring, functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 72 hours of sleep actigraphy monitoring, a blood draw, questionnaires, and physical measures. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENT(S): Twenty midlife women aged 40-60 years who had their uterus and both ovaries and were not taking hormone therapy (HT). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The DMN functional connectivity. RESULT(S): Controlling for age, race, and education, more physiologically-monitored hot flashes were associated with greater DMN connectivity (beta, B [SE] = 0.004 [0.002]), particularly hippocampal DMN connectivity (B [SE] = 0.005 [0.002]). Findings were most pronounced for sleep physiologic hot flashes (with hippocampal DMN, B [SE] = 0.02 [0.007]). Associations also persisted controlling for sleep, depressive symptoms, and serum E2 concentrations. CONCLUSION(S): More physiologically-monitored hot flashes were associated with more DMN connectivity, particularly networks supporting the hippocampus. Findings were most pronounced for sleep hot flashes. Findings underscore the importance of continued investigation of the central nervous system in efforts to understand this classic menopausal phenomenon.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether more physiologically assessed hot flashes were associated with more connectivity in the default mode network (DMN), the network of brain regions active during rest. We particularly focus on DMN networks supporting the hippocampus as this region is rich in estrogen (E) receptors (ER) and has previously been linked to hot flashes. DESIGN:Women underwent 24 hours of physiologic and diary hot flash monitoring, functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 72 hours of sleep actigraphy monitoring, a blood draw, questionnaires, and physical measures. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENT(S): Twenty midlife women aged 40-60 years who had their uterus and both ovaries and were not taking hormone therapy (HT). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The DMN functional connectivity. RESULT(S): Controlling for age, race, and education, more physiologically-monitored hot flashes were associated with greater DMN connectivity (beta, B [SE] = 0.004 [0.002]), particularly hippocampal DMN connectivity (B [SE] = 0.005 [0.002]). Findings were most pronounced for sleep physiologic hot flashes (with hippocampal DMN, B [SE] = 0.02 [0.007]). Associations also persisted controlling for sleep, depressive symptoms, and serum E2 concentrations. CONCLUSION(S): More physiologically-monitored hot flashes were associated with more DMN connectivity, particularly networks supporting the hippocampus. Findings were most pronounced for sleep hot flashes. Findings underscore the importance of continued investigation of the central nervous system in efforts to understand this classic menopausal phenomenon.
Authors: Ellen B Gold; Alicia Colvin; Nancy Avis; Joyce Bromberger; Gail A Greendale; Lynda Powell; Barbara Sternfeld; Karen Matthews Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Rebecca C Thurston; Yuefang Chang; Carol A Derby; Joyce T Bromberger; Sioban D Harlow; Imke Janssen; Karen A Matthews Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Michael C Craig; Paul C Fletcher; Eileen M Daly; Janice Rymer; William J Cutter; Mick Brammer; Vincent Giampietro; Harvey Wickham; Pauline M Maki; Declan G M Murphy Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2007-11-05 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Fiona C Baker; Negin Sattari; Massimiliano de Zambotti; Aimee Goldstone; William A Alaynick; Sara C Mednick Journal: Neurobiol Learn Mem Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Steven Jett; Eva Schelbaum; Grace Jang; Camila Boneu Yepez; Jonathan P Dyke; Silky Pahlajani; Roberta Diaz Brinton; Lisa Mosconi Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 5.702
Authors: Pauline M Maki; Leah H Rubin; Antonia Savarese; Lauren Drogos; Lee P Shulman; Suzanne Banuvar; David R Walega Journal: Maturitas Date: 2016-07-17 Impact factor: 4.342