Literature DB >> 23836434

Strengthening the assessment of factorial invariance across population subgroups: a commentary on Varni et al. (2013).

Cameron N McIntosh1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This article provides a commentary in response to "Varni et al. (Qual Life Res. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0370-4 , 2013)." METHODS AND
RESULTS: The commentary argues that the approximate model fit indexes commonly used in maximum-likelihood confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance testing are seriously flawed, as they overlook potentially serious model misspecifications that could bias parameter estimates and compromise inference.
CONCLUSIONS: Flexible and convenient Bayesian estimation approaches are presented that can substantially aid in: (1) resolving commonly encountered specification errors in confirmatory factor models and (2) locating specific measurement parameters that are non-invariant across population subgroups. It is recommended that these methods should be more widely adopted for evaluating the factorial invariance of patient-reported outcome measures and other types of instruments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23836434     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0465-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  22 in total

1.  Improving the evaluation of model fit in confirmatory factor analysis: A commentary on Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of life research, doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6.

Authors:  Cameron N McIntosh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis.

Authors:  David A Cole; Jeffrey A Ciesla; James H Steiger
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-12

3.  Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.

Authors:  Adam W Meade; Emily C Johnson; Phillip W Braddy
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2008-05

4.  Six patient-reported outcome measurement information system short form measures have negligible age- or diagnosis-related differential item functioning in individuals with disabilities.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Alyssa M Bamer; Dagmar Amtmann; Ivan R Molton; Mark P Jensen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Further insights on the French WISC-IV factor structure through Bayesian structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Philippe Golay; Isabelle Reverte; Jérôme Rossier; Nicolas Favez; Thierry Lecerf
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2012-11-12

Review 6.  Use of patient-reported outcomes in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Michaela A Dinan; Kate L Compton; Jatinder K Dhillon; Bradley G Hammill; Esi Morgan Dewitt; Kevin P Weinfurt; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Bayesian estimation of semiparametric nonlinear dynamic factor analysis models using the Dirichlet process prior.

Authors:  Sy-Miin Chow; Niansheng Tang; Ying Yuan; Xinyuan Song; Hongtu Zhu
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.

Authors:  Steven P Reise
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Beyond FEV₁ in COPD: a review of patient-reported outcomes and their measurement.

Authors:  Paul Jones; Marc Miravitlles; Thys van der Molen; Karoly Kulich
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2012-10-16
View more
  4 in total

1.  Commentary on strengthening the assessment of factorial invariance across population subgroups: a commentary on Varni et al. (2013).

Authors:  A Alexander Beaujean; Christine A Limbers; James W Varni
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Quality of Communication and Trust in Patients With Serious Illness: An Exploratory Study of the Relationships of Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Religiosity.

Authors:  Heather Coats; Lois Downey; Rashmi K Sharma; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Measuring Depression-Severity in Critically Ill Patients' Families with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): Tests for Unidimensionality and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance, with Implications for CONSORT.

Authors:  Lois Downey; Leslie A Hayduk; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Measuring health literacy in community agencies: a Bayesian study of the factor structure and measurement invariance of the health literacy questionnaire (HLQ).

Authors:  Gerald R Elsworth; Alison Beauchamp; Richard H Osborne
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.